Hi,
I read this on immigration-law. Bet some of you guys would have read it too!!!
Its a bit cryptic for me probably cos I am getting a bit anxious. Is it that all the pre-July visa bulletin fiasco filers have a visa number requested for their cases by USCIS from DOS or there is a possibility that there could be a few folks whose visa number have not been requested. At least thats what I figured from this excerpt. If the latter is indeed true, can we find out from an infopass that a visa number has been allocated to our cases?
-Zeppelin
"In the present situation, the USCIS has taken out almost all the EB visa numbers for FY 2007 (09/30/2007) before July 1, 2007 to adjudicate the pending and backlogged I-485 applications. Most of these applications have yet to be adjudicated using the visa numbers which have already been authorized. When it comes to these two cases, there are two open questions which have yet to be answered. The first question is whether the USCIS will continuously return the visa numbers for these cases. Report indicated that the USCIS started returning some of these numbers back to the DOS. Should this take place, the existing EB-485 waiters will expererience a long-wait to obtain approval of their backlogged EB-485 applications. The second question is "whether one's EB-485 application was tagged before July 1." At this time, this information is not available to anyone other than the USCIS itself. It is likely that this information will remain under the rug indefinitely. Accordingly, once his/her case was tagged, even though there is a chance that his/her visa number has been returned to the DOS, he or she will have a good chance to get I-485 application approval in the coming months. We may call them "lucky devil you!"
The other EB-485 waiters will turn out to be a big victim to the DOS/USCIS decision yesterday. Since there will be no visa numbers available until October 1, 2007, the people whose EB-485 applications were "not tagged" before July 1 will experience a tremendous delay in obtaining the green card. When it comes to the delays in obtaining the green card approvals, the new filers in July and those filers before August 17 will also witness a tremendous delays and will have to endure a long and long journey to leave the pipeline of the green card process. Why? As we reported quite earlier in this visa fiasco, we even estimated that approximately 750,000 individual EB-485 applications can be poured into the system during this unusual period of visa number availability as affected by the upcoming filing fee increases and more importantantly the anticipated potential huge visa number retrogression ahead during when they may not be able to file their 485 applications because of the retrogression. After all, the system has only 140,000 numbers for the entire EB categories for each year. Go figure! What would look like the waiting time for the current EB-485 filers and the current EB-485 filers before July 1, 2007! "
Zeppelin,
Ah, the million dollar question. Has there been a visa number assigned to pending cases. The quite honest answer is that no one really knows. CIS typically requests for a visa number from the DOS during adjudication time, when the case is just about to be approved. Rumor has it that CIS requested visa numbers in June for all pending approvable cases. No one has confirmed that rumor. Then again, no one has denied it either.
If you call the service centers, especially TSC, using the POJ method, the IOs would tell you that no visa numbers are currently available. I know of at least three individuals on the TSC threads that were told the same thing by the IOs at the TSC, got wicked depressed, only to be approved a week or after their call. Some IOs flat out tell you that they do not have access to that information. Some folks report taking Infopass appointments and the IOs there telling them that they cannot see that data. I tend to believe that is the case. There is a chance the visas have been allocated, but if not, shoot for October but hope for sooner...thats the philosophy I'm adopting at least.