Chicago Regional DOL Tracker - Old (Archived on 09/22/2004)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: AnbuFl can you pls answer something ?

Hello Solilariseeker,

Yes my case moved to DOL in April...OH Sesa is processing May 2003. yes it is for IT position

-A

Originally posted by solitaryseeker
Your case moved to DOL right in April...but Oh Sesa is still processing March 2003. I wanted to know if you filed for an IT position related labor and also if OH is still in March 2003?

Pls answer...OH thread is not that active so I miss out a lot af news.

thks :)
 
Hi Ilwaiting,

As Udai & Alvin mentioned, I guess it goes with dot code.. for example :FARMWORKER category I found some feb cases were certified.
Hope this helps...

Originally posted by Ilwaiting
Hi All,

Can any one please respond if you know until what date has DOL enterted cases into AVM. I did a random search and I noticed that some cases received into the regional office on March 2rd 2004 have been entered into the system. However mine (last week of February 2004) is still not in the system???

Any one has a clue?
 
Thanks for the info.

How come they approve later received 'farmworker ' worker application before a earlier received 'IT' position. Is this because there are too many IT applications OR could it be because there are fewer IT application specialized DOL officers OR do you think IT processing is generally on hold.

confused!
 
Re: Dec 11, 2003

I will need your case # and RD to find that out.
please remember that, it is just a guestimate and can be way off, if DOL is not feeling well ..... if you know what I mean :-(

Originally posted by kalse_2000
Hi alvin,
Can I get result from your formula as DOL Rcvd date for my case is 12/11.

Thanks
 
Hi guys,

any idea as to what difference it makes to have filed under one dot code as against another in IT field.
My case has been filed under 030.062-010 (s/w engineer). How it is treated differently from those in Programmer analyst or programmer etc.....

thanks
 
How do we find out ?

Hey Guys...

Appreciate if you could tell how you would know the details about a filing. I know there used to be a email reply that can give details of all the filing by employer but, that doesn't seem to work anymore. But I see in this forum that people are still able to track applications. Please enlighten me.

Thanks.
 
Hi Alvin and kalse_2000

can you guys please tell me if your case is listed in the DOL AVM.

My case was send to DOL on Jan 8th (I called SESA and found out), Unfortunately for me my Lawyer did not get a confirmation or receipt - so I don't have a case no - The only way for me to keep a track is through you guys.

Thanks in Advance
 
Just got a copy of the letter from DOL.

Basically they Remanded it Employer for 2 reasons.

- The Job requirement said that I needed a Masters and 2 yrs of experience. They want more proof showing 2 yrs of experience.
I have almost 6 yrs to date, 5yrs to date of initial filling and 3 yrs todate before joining the company. So that should not be a problem.

- They want additional testing or provide results from an active recruitment program as long as the programs is less than 6 months old. My company has just been hiring a bunch of people over the last 3 - 4 months and we do have active postings and listings on the web as well as leading IT journals. Apparently the Lawyer donot initially send all that to the DOL. Hold it in case the DOL asks for it.
Spoke with the HR person who sent me a copy of the Official DOL letter, also spoke with the lawyers. They received the letter on Monday and as of yesterday were in the process of reviewing and preparing a response. The lawyers told me that there was nothing needed from the Company or me since they had all the necessary information and docs to draft a response.
Out of the 3 cases, 2 cases mine and one other had similar DOL Reasons for remand to employer. The 3rd case had different reasons, dont know what.
All the cases had the Position of Systems Analyst.
I would attach the letter alongwith in case anybody wants to see what it looks like.
 
Heres the DOL letter

Dear Sir/Madam:

Your application for alien employment certification on behalf of xxxxxxx as a Systems
Analyst is herewith returned without processing because of the following reason(s):

1. Upon review of the alien's qualifications, it does not appear that he/she meets all the requirements found at Item 14 of the ETA 750, Part A. It does not appear that the alien has had two (2) years of experience in the job offered or in a related occupation involving the implementing or supporting of ERP or MRP packages. The burden is upon the employer to show otherwise.

2. According to the employer's recruitment report, despite its recruitment efforts it has had "difficulty finding qualified people for a number of open positions, partly due to the shortage of qualified information technology specialists in this geographic region as well as nationally." However, the Regional Office is very aware that the labor market has changed, with an increased availability of U.S. workers. In addition, the employer did not adequately address the regulations stated at 20 CFR 656.210) which requires the employer to provide the following: (1) identify each recruitment source by
name; (2) state the number of U.S. workers responding to the employer's recruitment; (3) state the names, addresses, and provide resumes, if any, of the U.S. workers interviewed for the job opportunity; (4) state job title of the person who interviewed each worker; and (5) explain with specificity the lawful job-related reasons for not hiring each U.S. worker interviewed. As a result, the employer's waiver request for Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) processing of the application cannot be approved without additional testing of the labor market.

In evaluating an Application for Alien Employment Certification for RIR processing, the Certifying Officer must determine: I) whether the employer conducted an adequate test of the labor market, and 2) whether able, willing and qualified U.S. workers are available for the occupation. Based upon my review of available labor market information and your recruitment report, I am not satisfied that accepting the RIR is appropriate.
The employer has three options in response to this letter: 1) withdraw the application, 2) request the application be remanded back to the State Workforce Agency (SWA) for regular processing, or 3) continue to pursue the RIR waiver request.

To continue to pursue the RIR waiver request, the employer must publish one additional
advertisement. The advertisement should be consistent with the advertisement(s) submitted in the original RIR request. It may be more detailed than.the original advertisement(s); however, any job duties or requirements included in the additional advertisement must also appear on the ETA 750A. The employer must allow at least two weeks for u.S. workers to respond to the advertisement. If the employer has an ongoing recruitment campaign for this occupation, the employer may use an advertisement that was published within the past six (6) months. If the additional advertisement does
not meet the requirements stated in this paragraph, the RIR waiver request will be denied and the application will be remanded to the SWA for supervised recruitment.
The employer must submit a copy of the additional advertisement and a recruitment report on the results of the advertisement within sixty (60) days from the date of this letter. No time extensions will be granted. The report must specify the number of applicants who responded to the advertisement and how many were interviewed. It must also provide specific, lawful, job-related reasons for rejecting any U.S. applicant. Incomplete, vague, or unclear recruitment results may result in a denial of the RIR request and a remand of the application to the SWA for supervised recruitment. Please note, if the employer utilizes an advertisement that was placed within the past six (6) months of the date of this letter, the employer must submit a detailed recruitment report at the level of individual positions and document reasons why specific individuals were not selected. In all cases, it is suggested that the employer include resumes of U.S. applicants
with the recruitment results. All correspondence should be sent to the address shown above.
Upon receipt of the employer's response, this office will consider the RIR request based on the advertisement submitted and the results of this additional recruitment and, pursuant to 20 CFR Part 656.21 (i)(4), will advise the employer whether the RIR is granted.
If the employer does not respond within sixty (60) days from the date of this letter, we will consider the application to have been abandoned and no further action will be taken.

Sincerely,
Raymond Moritz
Certifying Officer
Attachment(s): ETA 750A, ETA 750B
 
Originally posted by Ilwaiting
bsnf, Was your case filed in IL SWA? I believe that IL has not sent out case# to all. Even I did not receive a case#

Ilwaiting,

My case was filed in IL - thanks for your reply, I was actually worried because I did not get a case no.
Is there a way to fine out the case no.

Thanks for your help
 
bsnf,

No Its difficult. We tried numerous attempts to contact IL SESA to get a case#. They first told us that they have moved offices and the files are in the old offices. Asked us to call after 3 weeks. When we called after 3 weeks they told us that they are running on skeleton staff and that cases received by the office after August/Sepetember 2003 are in their system. The only info they were able to provide us was a log entry that the appl was received. They have now asked us to call back after 5 weeks.

I finally decided to Heck with it, and decided to wait for the case to appear in the AVM at the regional level!
 
Changing Attorney During LC Process

Hi Guys,
Iam new to this forum.My case was filed form IL.
Here are the details
SESA PD : 06/20/2003
Sent to DOL : Sep 19 2003
Remanded to State : Nov 23 2003
Type : RIR

After this there is no info on this.When i contacted my attorney ,he says it was sent back to USDOL on Jan 8th 2004 from SESA and so far it was not updated in the AVM.I called USDOL they said they havent received any info about my case.
Iam not satisfied the way my Attorney is handling things.Can i change my Attorney now.If yes what will be the possible pros and cons.

I will appreciate any response you guys.

Thanks
 
Re: Help me

Originally posted by nisha_1978_007

Hi everyone

My RIR case was forwarded to Chicago Office Nov 18th. My case got rejected few days back. I dont know why. Automated system just says RIR rejected. Can you guys help me decided what to do now. My lawyer says he cant call the chicago office.????? I joined my present company for my GC. I checked the whole discussion group, looks like i am the only person who's case got rejected. WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Help me please

Nisha


My case dated 18th Nov telephone retrieval system says RIR denied. Lawyers said there was an RFE and they have responded back with more documents. I asked them if they got RFE or are they kind of re-appealing against the decision and she said yes they r re-appealing and will get final decision in 4 weeks. The lawyer says that now most of the cases filed in EB3/RIR r being rejected asking more evidence

Employer says in last 1 yr Indian companies have moved to chicago area just for file GC because it is fast. Due to this now they r asking for more evidence on RIR appls. Like how recruitement was done, evidence of ads, they even have to send the resumes of the candidates that had applied for that ad and the reasons why all the candidates were rejected

why was ur case rejected? what are the options? What does your lawyers say about this? etc

I would appreciate ur feedback.
 
Remand to state

Hi

My case was remanded to state on the April, 8. But I have not received any documents from DOL or SWA. Could you tell me is it a normal delay?

Is there anybody who has been remanded to state? How long did it take to get a notification from DOL or SWA?

Thanks.
 
I talked to ILLINOIS DOL today and they are telling me that NON-RIR Labors are getting processed and they have started to process october 2002.

Some people on this board wrote that ILLINOIS DOL has put a stop to NON-RIR processing for next 18 months or something like until PERM process becomes implemented. They also said that their lawyers gave them this information.
 
" Hi Bhasu,
What was Tile of your LCA? It seems from dot code its not IT.
Please give us some more detail like non RIR/RIR , state ...and what was query for Remanded to state?

Thanks in advance.
Kalse_2000

Bhasu,

Why your lawyer changed the experience? Try to meeting the new rule? Is that a must to meet the new rule of experience in the additional advertisement? Thanks!

Seabird "


Hi Kalse_2000 and Seabird
Sorry to reply you late.
Yes Kalse_2000 my DOT code is Non-IT. Its for Mechanical Engineer. Its filed as RIR case
and it was "Remanded to Employer" for retesting of Market for 2 weeks and They gave us 60 days
to reply back.

And Seabird, No its not mendatoryto change the experience but it was "allowed" by DOL as
" while retest of Market Experience may be modified" So we chnage in the Ad from BS+1 Yr to
BS+3 yrs ( I have 6 Yrs prior to my petitioning employer) So I changed just to get 'better' response to the Ad.

Hope this helps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top