Voting Before Naturalization Can Cause you Problems

Under what circumstances do applicants receive such a letter by mail after interview if they don't get it on the spot?

I didn't received it by mail, I got it on the spot at the interview:)... But since a decision couldn't about the op's case at the time of the interview, he received the approval letter by mail. What I meant to say by I "No I have not" in the post above is that, I have not heard a case being recommended for approval and then denied letter on, it has happened before I am sure in rare circumstances, but i have heard of such case, and I think in the op's case, they must have thoroughly reviewed it (with supervisors and all) before sending him a "recommended for approval" n652
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't received it by mail, I got it on the spot at the interview:)... But since a decision couldn't about the op's case at the time of the interview, he received the approval letter by mail.

It is not the approval letter (N-445) yet for the OP. It is the interview result
letter N-652 as he said. This is the first time I heard anyone got it by mail
(unless he went to his second interview).

It is pretty much a done deal because I think the USCIS is very conservative
when giing N-652. The final decision should be almost certainly better than
whatever is indicated by N652.
 
I think in the op's case, they must have thoroughly reviewed it (with supervisors and all) before sending him a "recommended for approval" n652

Don't know what is the status of the other relevant case: the girl
who got tired of being asked about her imigration status and told
her friends she was a US citizen and disclosed such informal claim
during the interview.
 
Well, it says "...if final approval is granted, you will be notified when and where to report for the Oath Ceremony..." so IF is always not a good thing.... have you ever heard of any case where someone got disapproved after the receive this letter.
Thanks for the kind word

Mekhtoub....Congratulations.

:)
 
I received the letter in the mail yesterday and I am still not so excited until I see the Oath Ceremony invitation. I am just so happy that I did not pay $600 for a letter or $1500 to the other lawyer or did what the third lawyer suggested (withdraw my application). If my case has been reviewed by a supervisor, then I would think, I am 99% good to go, but if this is just a recommendation for approval that must be reviewed by others before a final decision is made, I would wait until I see that final approval.
You guys are awesome, I cannot thank you enough for the support and the advice you have given me. For those who prayed for me, please keep praying until I see the final approval.
 
Don't know what is the status of the other relevant case: the girl
who got tired of being asked about her imigration status and told
her friends she was a US citizen and disclosed such informal claim
during the interview.

I wish her a very good luck. The difference is that I have never knowingly claimed to be a US citizen. Someone mentioned Jury Duty and I remembered when I recieved a Jury Duty letter, I called them and said that my English was not good enough for me to make dicisions in court so they asked me if I was a US citizen and I said No. The key here is "knowingly" how many times, how long ago and why a person claimed to be a US citizen. If someone signs a form that had a disclaimer in the middle of it without paying attention to what it says and when he/she knew about it, they did something to correct the issue, I think IOs can see that it was a stupid but honest mistake and they take that into consediration.
I am not 100% optimistic yet, but I can say, this letter means a lot to me.
FYI: I checked with Microsoft if they can make an e-Pizza for me to post it for you guys. I have not heard back from them yet.:)
 
But you can definitely post e-check :):cool::D:eek:.. Just kidding..
Anyway - we are happy for the good news and hope everything will be fine and smooth.

I wish her a very good luck. The difference is that I have never knowingly claimed to be a US citizen. Someone mentioned Jury Duty and I remembered when I recieved a Jury Duty letter, I called them and said that my English was not good enough for me to make dicisions in court so they asked me if I was a US citizen and I said No. The key here is "knowingly" how many times, how long ago and why a person claimed to be a US citizen. If someone signs a form that had a disclaimer in the middle of it without paying attention to what it says and when he/she knew about it, they did something to correct the issue, I think IOs can see that it was a stupid but honest mistake and they take that into consediration.
I am not 100% optimistic yet, but I can say, this letter means a lot to me.
FYI: I checked with Microsoft if they can make an e-Pizza for me to post it for you guys. I have not heard back from them yet.:)
 
So do I consider this letter as a final approval? Is there any chance that I can be denied even after receiving this letter? Does anyone know of a case like this?
Thanks
 
So do I consider this letter as a final approval? Is there any chance that I can be denied even after receiving this letter? Does anyone know of a case like this?
Thanks

Maslouj,

I've been following your case since you first posted it. From the looks of it, your case has been approved. A supervisor approval is usually just a formality, where the supervisor looks through your application to make sure that the IO didn't miss anything. From what I recall, there was one case posted here that was denied after being recommended for approval. From what I remember, it was due to a date miscalculation. The applicant broke his continuous residency and the interviewer didn't catch it. Since your case doesn't have a date discrepancy, I believe you're good to go.
 
Maslouj,

I've been following your case since you first posted it. From the looks of it, your case has been approved. A supervisor approval is usually just a formality, where the supervisor looks through your application to make sure that the IO didn't miss anything. From what I recall, there was one case posted here that was denied after being recommended for approval. From what I remember, it was due to a date miscalculation. The applicant broke his continuous residency and the interviewer didn't catch it. Since your case doesn't have a date discrepancy, I believe you're good to go.

Oh my God this is really good news for me. I hope it will come true. Thank you so much for your answer.
 
Oh my God this is really good news for me. I hope it will come true. Thank you so much for your answer.

Are you going to regiter to vote if you get approval? or now you are
paranoid so that you won't want to vote even if you are eligble?

:)
 
Are you going to regiter to vote if you get approval? or now you are
paranoid so that you won't want to vote even if you are eligble?

:)

I can confidentally say he will maintain his residency at least 5 miles radius from any polling booth.

Never drives on the road which is close to a polling station.

He will ask the voting agency to file a restraining oder against him... so he never ever mistakenly goes close to all things voting.

He will ask Feds to invent a V-chip for TV so that any voting or election related programs will exceed the ratings and will be turned off.
:D:D:D:D
 
Are you going to regiter to vote if you get approval? or now you are
paranoid so that you won't want to vote even if you are eligble?

:)

Hahaha!!! this is funny because I told my wife the same thing yesterday. I said I am so scared of this voting dilemma, I am not even going to vote ever...:)
I think this will change with time but for now. I really have to keep my fingers crossed until I see the Oath Ceremony letter.
 
:D
I can confidentally say he will maintain his residency at least 5 miles radius from any polling booth.

Never drives on the road which is close to a polling station.

He will ask the voting agency to file a restraining oder against him... so he never ever mistakenly goes close to all things voting.

He will ask Feds to invent a V-chip for TV so that any voting or election related programs will exceed the ratings and will be turned off.
:D:D:D:D

Oh my God you made me laugh so bad:) you are reading my mind man....
 
I feel like calling these lawyers who wanted to charge me so much money and tell them something....and I want to call the last lawyer I saw who revised my letter and rewarded couple of things to thank her so much and recommend her to everyone here in Memphis. She was honest and she did not charge me for anything she works for http://www.visalaw.com/attorneys.html
 
Top