1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Tracker:485 Approvals after Retrogression:Oct to Dec 2005

Discussion in '485 issues in Nebraska Service Center' started by nato, Sep 28, 2005.

  1. Lakshya

    Lakshya Registered Users (C)

    He is from Pakistan.....
  2. fiveice

    fiveice Registered Users (C)

    Well, even Parkistan has 01MAR01 as the cutoff date for EB3. The guy's PD is 04/19/2001, which is later than 01MAR01.

  3. nato

    nato Registered Users (C)

    Which if true looks optimistic, however another guy with PD 02/01 from pak is

    approved as posted in the forum elsewhere. just wondering if it is the same guy..but PD is different unless he deliberately mentioned feb 01 in lieu of april 01
  4. fiveice

    fiveice Registered Users (C)

    S. 1033 or S. 1438?

    Hi, all,

    I checked the first hearing on S. 1033 and S. 1438 on 7/26. Core sponsors of both bills testimonied before the hearing.

    By looking at both bills, I would think S. 1033 seems very promising.

    It has the following good things:

    • increasing the number of employment-based numbers from 140,000 to 290,000 per year, reallocating the distribution of those numbers, and providing for the recapture of unused numbers;

    • increasing the per-country limits for both family- and employment-based immigrants;

    The per-country limit is increased from 7% to 10%.

  5. maltu

    maltu Guest

    Quick Q..How did you get the status on the Name check clearence?

  6. nato

    nato Registered Users (C)

    NSC approval

    One EB2 approval posted for OCT 13th


    I485 EB2
    RD 09/18/02
    ND 10/18/02
    1-st FP 11/22/02
    2-d FP 08/10/04
    3-d EAD 08/23/04
    No RFE
    AD - 09/30/04 - for me & my son

    My husband
    local interview day - 09/28/05 ( name check wasn't clear)
    AD - 10/13/05

  7. ak_new_member

    ak_new_member Registered Users (C)

    What's happening at USCIS?

    Is there any EB3 approval since 1 Oct? With the priority dates backlogged so much I would think there would be some approvals to justify the retrogression. But I don't see any approvals. I wish this process was more transparent and we are not left out in the dark to make our own interpretations of the USCIS actions.
  8. dcmetro22042

    dcmetro22042 Registered Users (C)

    I did FP on wednesday and I noticed that there is a LUD for today but the comments did not change. What does that mean?
  9. nato

    nato Registered Users (C)

    LUD very unpredictable, no pattern, however after 3rd, msg change FP received usually

  10. dcmetro22042

    dcmetro22042 Registered Users (C)

    thanks. still no change in msg after 4-5 days. will keep hoping for a change.

Share This Page