San Francisco Regional DOL Tracker

gp111 said:
Here is the reason why I wait for BEC with PD of 7/02

.. If go for Sub EB-3 LC & apply for I-140 today.. so my PD will be 05/05.. I will get my I-140 in next 6 months.. But I will only be able to file I-485 most likely in 05/2007 & get GC by end of 2007.

.. If wait for BEC.. I will get my LC WORST CASE by DEC-05 & get GC by DEC-06...
Click to expand...

Thanks now i got it

Under what cirmstances an Earlier PD can be utilized for substitution Labor
 
How can one file two I-140, ie. one 140 gets into trouble, file it via another? is that requires pay-stubs from employer right? how can one get it from both?

I had similar case, but i elected to stick with current LC due to same reason GP111 specified.

gp111 said:
Here is the reason why I wait for BEC with PD of 7/02

.. If go for Sub EB-3 LC & apply for I-140 today.. so my PD will be 05/05.. I will get my I-140 in next 6 months.. But I will only be able to file I-485 most likely in 05/2007 & get GC by end of 2007.

.. If wait for BEC.. I will get my LC WORST CASE by DEC-05 & get GC by DEC-06...
Click to expand...
 
pleaseGOD said:
How can one file two I-140, ie. one 140 gets into trouble, file it via another? is that requires pay-stubs from employer right? how can one get it from both?

I had similar case, but i elected to stick with current LC due to same reason GP111 specified.
Click to expand...

You can file two I-140s but not I-485...
Filing I-140 does not need paystubs from Sponsering Employer. Pay Stubs are proof of current Job & legal status.. You can submit pay stubs of current employers pay stubs with future employers I-140 if RFE comes..
 
gp111 said:
If LC has been approved & Unused.. with matching profile
Click to expand...

You mean
Current LC has been approved
use Unused approved substitution labour with matching profile
then PD of current LC can be used for substittuion

For those who feel that we are deviating the thread
GP is more knwoledgeble and my questions will make everybody better understanding for how and if condition for substitution labors which most of us will be pondering if we get one :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mnhrdc said:
You mean
Current LC has been approved, use Unused approved substitution labour with matching profile then PD of current LC can be used for substittuion

Aliens original PD can be used with Labor Substitution if
1) LC has been certified but I-140 has not been filed/rejected for any reason.
2) I-140 has been withdrawn
In this case you will submit proof of original LC PD when you file I-140 with Substitute LC.

SECONDLY,
In some cases (if you have a great Attorney like Rajiv !) Original PD can be used even if someone has already used that LC( For example, it ways AAA's LC, he left the company, BBB used his LC to as SUB.. Now AAA wants to use PD). Here you have to prove the HARDSHIP or similar for not using the LC & using PD. .. this has limited chances of approval.





For those who feel that we are deviating the thread
GP is more knwoledgeble and my questions will make everybody better understanding for how and if condition for substitution labors which most of us will be pondering if we get one :)
Click to expand...
 
Approvals

Case#----Cert-RD-------DOT/OCC---
09559573 5/9 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559575 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559577 5/9 4/11/2003 999.517-011
09559579 5/9 4/11/2003 999.391-021
09559580 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559581 5/9 4/11/2003 999.352-014
09559582 5/6 4/11/2003 999.113-021
09559584 5/6 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559585 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072 Some one claimed this case has been certified couple of weeks back but looks like it is certified yesterday
09559587 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-051
09559591 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072
09559593 5/6 4/11/2003 999.271-024

They skipped about 20 cases after last updates (5/5)
 
rajhmal said:
Case#----Cert-RD-------DOT/OCC---
09559573 5/9 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559575 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559577 5/9 4/11/2003 999.517-011
09559579 5/9 4/11/2003 999.391-021
09559580 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559581 5/9 4/11/2003 999.352-014
09559582 5/6 4/11/2003 999.113-021
09559584 5/6 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559585 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072 Some one claimed this case has been certified couple of weeks back but looks like it is certified yesterday
09559587 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-051
09559591 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072
09559593 5/6 4/11/2003 999.271-024

They skipped about 20 cases after last updates (5/5)
Click to expand...

Thanks Raj. They skipped 0955956x. :(
 
rajhmal said:
Case#----Cert-RD-------DOT/OCC---
09559573 5/9 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559575 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559577 5/9 4/11/2003 999.517-011
09559579 5/9 4/11/2003 999.391-021
09559580 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-032
09559581 5/9 4/11/2003 999.352-014
09559582 5/6 4/11/2003 999.113-021
09559584 5/6 4/11/2003 999.132-011
09559585 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072 Some one claimed this case has been certified couple of weeks back but looks like it is certified yesterday
09559587 5/9 4/11/2003 999.151-051
09559591 5/9 4/11/2003 999.172-072
09559593 5/6 4/11/2003 999.271-024

They skipped about 20 cases after last updates (5/5)
Click to expand...


Thanks Raj
 
Labor Substitue

Gurus,

I have a question about labor substitute. I have been with company XXX for 5 years now. I didn't have any experience when I joined company XXX. (Right after my Masters). My company has approved labor which has MS + 1year exp. All other requirment in Labor matches with mine at the time this labor application was applied. Is there any way I can use my experience with company XXX to file labor substitute ?

Appreciate any help.
 
I called SFDOL they said all cases that received after end of April 2003 will be sent to BEC. But I heard many different date, someone said May 2003 and someone said March 2003... Anyone know the actual date?

By looking at the case # of this thread, why my wife case # only have 6 digit and it start with 154xxx, anyone know why?
 
petelt said:
I called SFDOL they said all cases that received after end of April 2003 will be sent to BEC. But I heard many different date, someone said May 2003 and someone said March 2003... Anyone know the actual date?

By looking at the case # of this thread, why my wife case # only have 6 digit and it start with 154xxx, anyone know why?
Click to expand...

RIR
END OF APRIL-2003 = 1ST OF MAY-2003 & BEYOND.

NonRIR
1st OCT-2003 & BEYOND

The case number you have is SWA Case Number. What the case moved to Regional ? What was the RD ? If your receive date at SF DOL was May-2003 & beyond you can get BEC Case Number information by sending email to Dallas BEC. If it was eatlier try to look for it in to flcdatacenter.com
 
yes you are right, thanks for correcting me.
Is that true only cases in BEC will receive 45 days letter?

SESA PD 5/24/2002
DOL RD 4/14/2003
RIR case# 09559xxx and still waiting
 
petelt said:
yes you are right, thanks for correcting me.
Is that true only cases in BEC will receive 45 days letter?

SESA PD 5/24/2002
DOL RD 4/14/2003
RIR case# 09559xxx and still waiting
Click to expand...

You are one of the Lucky ones.. You will not get 45 day letter but "APPROVAL" from SF DOL in few days..


good luck
 
gp111, need help

gp111,

Do you know if the 20 hours per week can be counted for 2 years exp.? In my job description, it says 2 years exp. as a user or computer technician, and in 750A, we entered "2 years" under exp. I had 2 years exp. of 20 hours per week in the university.
I had 5 years exp. in computer training outside U.S, but I only entered the trainer title, did not mention the training is through the computer-based. Can I use these 5 years exp. to support my 2 years exp. requirement? or combine both exp.?

Thanks a lot and look forward to hearing soon.

xyr888
 
xyr888 said:
gp111,

Do you know if the 20 hours per week can be counted for 2 years exp.? In my job description, it says 2 years exp. as a user or computer technician, and in 750A, we entered "2 years" under exp. I had 2 years exp. of 20 hours per week in the university.
I had 5 years exp. in computer training outside U.S, but I only entered the trainer title, did not mention the training is through the computer-based. Can I use these 5 years exp. to support my 2 years exp. requirement? or combine both exp.?

Thanks a lot and look forward to hearing soon.

xyr888
Click to expand...

This is Tricky & could result in RFE.. What does your attorney says ?
 
Labor subtitute help

gp111

I have a question about labor substitution. I have been with company XXX for 5 years now. I didn't have any experience when I joined company XXX. (Right after my Masters). My company XXX has approved labor which has MS + 1year exp. All other requirment in Labor matches with mine at the time this labor application was applied(exp requirnment also matched but I gained that exp in the same company). Is there any way I can use my experience with company XXX to file labor substitute ?

Appreciate any help.
 
gp111,

Yes, you are right. Just got RFE regarding the previous employment exp.
It says:
The beneficiary did not submit exp. letter/s. The petitioner is requested to provide evidence to establish that the beneficiary possesses the 2 years of exp. listed onn the Form ETA 750.... Provide a letter from previous employer including duty, title, dates of employment/exp. and number of hours worked per week.
My attorney said today he will review all the documentation of mine and get back to me this week to see how to respond the RFE.
Before I get the word from my attorney, I'd like to get your inputs and suggestions on this matter since you have expertise on these issue and are helpful on this forum. This is why many of us on this forum said you could be a lawyer.
What is the chance of getting appoval on this case after responding RFE? Do you think I should submit 20 hours exp. plus 5 years full-time exp. outside U.S to satisfy it. Have you met the similar situation like me?
Please give me some insights.

Thanks again.
xyr888









gp111 said:
This is Tricky & could result in RFE.. What does your attorney says ?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top