Hello, I am so hoping there would be someone who has similar situation where I am now and who can help me on the matter.
I-485, I-765 filed on 02/09/07
MSC NC for both 2/14/07
Biometrics NC received 2/23/07
Biometrics appointment 3/9/07
REF on 485 sent on 2/27/07, received 03/17/07 due to attorney's office move
RFE (Request for Initial Evidence) is for 864 affridavit of support. My father (petitioner) is a sponsor and he's income is more than the guideline (125% above poverty line). RFE asks me to send proofs of income (letter of employment, current employers, nature of jobs, wages and salary etc). My father is self employed. My attorney sent w2 and 2005 tax return.
In response to this RFE, I am preparing a joint sponsor from my boyfriend.
Can anybody tell me if I am doing the right thing? My attorney certainly didn't do a good job nor had she given me correct info.
On the RFE, "you are ineligible for interim employment authrization pursuant to Title 8, Code of Federal REgulations, Section 103.2 (b)(10)(ii) until ninety (90) days after the missing initial evidence is received. --> what does this mean?
I-485, I-765 filed on 02/09/07
MSC NC for both 2/14/07
Biometrics NC received 2/23/07
Biometrics appointment 3/9/07
REF on 485 sent on 2/27/07, received 03/17/07 due to attorney's office move
RFE (Request for Initial Evidence) is for 864 affridavit of support. My father (petitioner) is a sponsor and he's income is more than the guideline (125% above poverty line). RFE asks me to send proofs of income (letter of employment, current employers, nature of jobs, wages and salary etc). My father is self employed. My attorney sent w2 and 2005 tax return.
In response to this RFE, I am preparing a joint sponsor from my boyfriend.
Can anybody tell me if I am doing the right thing? My attorney certainly didn't do a good job nor had she given me correct info.
On the RFE, "you are ineligible for interim employment authrization pursuant to Title 8, Code of Federal REgulations, Section 103.2 (b)(10)(ii) until ninety (90) days after the missing initial evidence is received. --> what does this mean?