Rajiv, thank you for addressing LPR’s stuck abroad over a year. I am unable to call in, so if I may, 3 simple follow-up questions:
1. Regarding airlines not allowing LPR’s to board a flight home to US:
- The Timatic/IATA database (that airlines use to determine documents required to board) indicates that a physical I-551 is sufficient (timaticweb.com), and
- The US embassy indicates that even an expired I-551 is enough, if it was a 10-year card
(no.usembassy.gov/visas/immigrant-visas/boarding-foil/).
Is this a matter of being supposed to work (in theory according to the rules), but is not actually working in practice? Perhaps because too many airline employees don’t know the rules?
2. Regarding SB1 being the only option to re-instate green card, several articles indicate another way:
Quoting one source:
“If your green card (Form I-551) has not expired, you may wish to travel directly to the US and assert at the port of entry that you never abandoned permanent residency. While this is more risky than applying for an SB-1 visa, the Customs and Border Protection official has discretion to waive you into the US even without a technically valid I-551. The CBP official may ask you to complete Form I-193, Application for Waiver of Passport and/or Visa and pay the requisite filing fee. In the event that the CBP official does not waive you into the US, as a lawful permanent resident you have the right to have an Immigration Judge review your claim, and the burden of proof is on the government through clear and convincing evidence that you abandoned permanent residency.” (source: lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/insidenews/posts/faq-for-green-card-holders-during-the-covid-19-period)
My understanding from these articles is that upon presenting the inspector convincing evidence that permanent residence has not been abandoned, if waived into the US, then removal proceedings are averted. It was even suggested it could, in certain cases, be a better path than SB1, since State Department rules applied by the embassy are more stringent than those applied by CBP. The key elements of evidence appear to be that family, work and home remained in the US.
As above, is this a case of being fine in theory, but not working often in practice? Or perhaps, that despite the embassy's more difficult rules, SB-1 success rates are nevertheless higher than presenting evidence to CBP at border?
3. While waiting for CR1 to process, is a Philippine spouse of an LPR likely to succeed in an F1 application?