Recent Development At Newark Airport: Does this impact TN also?

no_trying

Registered Users (C)
In Newark Airport, CBOs are randomly selecting and interrogating Visa Permit holders and either deporting them or denying them. Anyone landed in Newark Airport recently with TN?
 
It would have to be from outside North America, since if you fly to EWR from Canada you clear US immigration at Pre-Flight.
 
Visa Holders Will Face Random Checks at Newark Airport



Employment-Based Visa Holders



U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the Newark, New Jersey International Airport recently instituted a new policy to conduct random checks for employment-based visa holders, including foreign nationals in H and L status. CBP informed the American Immigration Lawyers Association about the new policy in response to an inquiry about several instances in which H-1B visa holders were extensively questioned about their employers, the computation and rate of their pay, and their job duties. After questioning, some of these foreign nationals were subjected to expedited removal from the United States, and visa cancellation.



While CBP told the American Immigration Lawyers Association that the questioning of the H-1B workers was related to a particular ongoing investigation, the agency also stated that CBP officers would now conduct random checks of H, L, and other employment-based visa holders. The ostensible purpose of the random checks is to confirm the bona fides of a visa holder’s employment situation, and ensure that they conform to the information in the petition filed on the visa holder’s behalf. If the initial check leads to a question about a visa holder’s admissibility to the United States, the visa holder will be sent to “secondary inspection” for a more in-depth interview with CBP.



CBP stated that if an officer discovers discrepancies between the information provided by the visa holder and a petition or petitions filed by the employer, the officer may request that the visa holder withdraw his or her request for admission to the United States and return to his or her home country. Alternatively, in more egregious circumstances, the CBP officer may place the visa holder in expedited removal, a proceeding that bars the visa holder from returning to the United States for five years.



Returning Lawful Permanent Residents with a Post-1998 Conviction



CBP may also detain a returning Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) who has a post-1998 criminal conviction. CBP at the Newark Airport stated that it adopted a mandatory detention policy for LPR’s who have post-1998 convictions. The LPR may be released in the event that CBP cannot get a copy of the conviction record within 24 hours. CBP also stated that it would consider release in extenuating circumstances, such as families traveling with children.



Conditional Residents with Pending I-751 Petitions or ADIT Lawful Permanent Resident Stamp



CBP at Newark International Airport stated that a conditional resident who obtained lawful permanent resident status through marriage and has a pending I-751 petition to remove the conditions on his or her residence will also be subject to additional procedures at entry. Such conditional residents who are returning to the United States via Newark airport with an I-751 filing receipt or an ADIT Legal Permanent Resident stamp (which is added to a passport or Form I-94 as temporary proof of residence) will be sent to secondary inspection for further questioning on the validity of the I-751 petition.



How This Affects You



The announcement by CBP at the Newark Airport may signal a similar tightening at other ports of entry. Foreign nationals traveling on employment-based temporary visas should be prepared for additional questioning at entry. Prior to travel, visa petitions should be reviewed to ensure that all details are accurate. Foreign nationals should be familiar with the information provided in any petition filed on their behalf by their employers, and should be able to corroborate that information orally. In addition, employment-based temporary visa holders should carry full copies of the petitions filed on their behalf by their employers and their two most recent pay statements. Travelers should also be aware that CBP retains the discretion to review material and information on laptops and other electronic devices.



CBP does not need to permit a traveler to call legal counsel if there is a problem at entry. Indeed, most CBP officers do not allow such phone calls. However, should an employee face an uncomfortable interview at entry and be permitted to contact his or her employer, the employer should contact immigration counsel immediately upon learning the details. Immigration counsel may be able to follow up with the officer or the CBP port director at the particular port of entry and gain additional information.



In addition, employers should be prepared to confirm the assertions made in any nonimmigrant petition and supporting documentation in case of a telephone inquiry by a CBP officer. Finally, employers should note that the government may review information in any public venue, including websites and other media, so such public information should be accurate and current.



If you have a traveling employee who may be impacted by the mandatory detention policy for post-1998 convictions, or the secondary inspection policy for those who have pending petitions to remove the conditions on lawful permanent residence, contact your immigration counsel for further information and advice.
 
While this is interesting, it has no relevance to Canadians or other aliens traveling from Canada.

TRC, your comments look like in your opinion, this "recent development at Newark airport" information should not be posted on this forum, but what about "The announcement by CBP at the Newark Airport may signal a similar tightening at other ports of entry"? Do you have any information that confirms this will never happen at PFI's or on the Canada-US border?

Also TN holders sometimes travel out of North America and fly back directly to the US. Sometimes through Newark airport. These ones (at the very least) may want to know.
 
TNs are ALWAYS subject to scrutiny and re-adjudication, so as TRC opines, this is really 'dog bites man' info.
 
Please post links when quoting other websites.

Yes, you are right, I should've mentioned the source.
It was an internal email sent from Immigration Law firm my company works with to all employees with open immigration cases.
 
For example, Pre-Flight Inspection is done in Toronto then your connecting flight to Newark is at Chicago. This type of flight transfers within US and landing in Newark be also put you in same category as a person with TN coming from outside of North America after completing the project oversees? (Direct flight from Toronto to Newark won't be problem since PFI is done in Toronto Pearson International Airport. What if I have to take transfer flights within US?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For example, Pre-Flight Inspection is done in Toronto then your connecting flight to Newark is at Chicago. This type of flight transfers within US and landing in Newark be also put you in same category as a person with TN coming from outside of North America after completing the project oversees? (Direct flight from Toronto to Newark won't be problem since PFI is done in Toronto Pearson International Airport. What if I have to take transfer flights within US?)

If you fly directly from Toronto to Chicago, you do PFI in Toronto. Any flight you take from Chicago is a domestic US flight. Why would it be any different?

The more I read about this, the more I'd be worried if I was an Indian national working on an H-1 for a bodyshopper. There's fair amount of fraud going on there.
 
There are about a dozen forums on this site where this thread would be better served.

Let's drop it.
 
Top