I hope you're right.
However, the factor that EB1/2 retrogression only applies to India and China makes it hard to believe that the intention of this retrogression is to enforce FIFO in any sense. If they wanted to hold the process for a while and sort it through, they would have set EB1/2 cut-off date for other countries as well, like 2004. Only in this way, PERM applicants would be effectively blocked out during this transition. Beside, the degree of Eb1/2 retrogression for Indian and China is just beyond imagination, if EB3 is more construable when you compare to EB3 retrogression for other countries. I guess it's more like either policy change or big mis-estimation.
I think AILA probably is on immigrant's side on this issue, since the irrational retrogression would only discourage potential immigration applicants, thus affecting their future business. Also employer, especially hi-tech industry will probably do sth. Think Bill Gates lobbied 20k H1B just last year. Stay tuned, it’s not the end yet.
Also prepared to donate money if somebody files a lawsuit.
Thanks!
However, the factor that EB1/2 retrogression only applies to India and China makes it hard to believe that the intention of this retrogression is to enforce FIFO in any sense. If they wanted to hold the process for a while and sort it through, they would have set EB1/2 cut-off date for other countries as well, like 2004. Only in this way, PERM applicants would be effectively blocked out during this transition. Beside, the degree of Eb1/2 retrogression for Indian and China is just beyond imagination, if EB3 is more construable when you compare to EB3 retrogression for other countries. I guess it's more like either policy change or big mis-estimation.
I think AILA probably is on immigrant's side on this issue, since the irrational retrogression would only discourage potential immigration applicants, thus affecting their future business. Also employer, especially hi-tech industry will probably do sth. Think Bill Gates lobbied 20k H1B just last year. Stay tuned, it’s not the end yet.
Also prepared to donate money if somebody files a lawsuit.
Thanks!
tikal said:What changed in a month is the dawning of the fact that
[1] PBEC & DBEC are approving LCs not in a strict FIFO
[2] Among the 2 BECs, DBEC is approving early '03 cases, while '01 cases in PBEC rot in hell
[3] After some teething problems, the PERM process is now creaking along, spewing out some more approved LCs with PDs after 03.2005
[4] Before all hell breaks loose, with the system getting dead-halted with lawsuits, this was the most opportune time to call for a stoppage in filing all 485 apps. Thus the degree of retrogression.
[5] PERMers and later-date non-PERMers need to wait for the early-dated PDs. The 2 BECs & PERM will continue to dump approvals, but post LC, everyone is now in single file. Strict FIFO has been imposed. This is only fair.
[6] As regards the # of visas/yr, that will be a politically charged issue. I don't see any stakeholder (employer, client, attorney, political representatives) except us who is on the immigrant's side.
[7] EB1/EB2 cut-offs should jump ahead fairly fast. Chinese & Indians in EB3 are looking at massive delays.
Last edited by a moderator: