Al Southner
Registered Users (C)
Department of Licensing
Where does it originate from? I am not familiar with it's use. oh...well..
Department of Licensing
Maslouj would not be a citizen now if his voting was within the 5 year window. His case is different, as he voted in 2000.Everything is a gamble. Maslouj would not be a citizen now had he listened to
your advice.
Maslouj would not be a citizen now if his voting was within the 5 year window. His case is different, as he voted in 2000.
He could have been deported. But because the voting was before the 5 year window, he had a realistic chance of getting approved. He took a risk to get the reward.But what everyone is concerned about is deportation and for deportation purpose, this five years does not matter unless you can point out Maslouj's voting was done even before he got the GC (and he disclosed it during GC interview even I485 did not even ask for it) and USCIS had only 5 years to revoke it.
Department of Licensing is a Washington state's analogue of Department of Motor Vehicles in other states. I forgot that DOL also stands for the Department of Labour.Where does it originate from? I am not familiar with it's use. oh...well..
He could have been deported. But because the voting was before the 5 year window, he had a realistic chance of getting approved. He took a risk to get the reward.
No need to serve in the military to ameliorate this particular offense. What if he's blown to pieces while serving in Iraq? Did you consider how that is going to bolster his shredded body parts?
True, voting makes a non citizen deportable by law,but it's not just the act of voting but the intent behind it.
They may decide to do nothing, and may even approve an N-400 aplication, as maslouj's example shows. A great deal seems to depend on the discretion of the IO handling the case.
Voting by a noncitizen is not a mandatory deportable offense. If it happened outside the 5-year window, USCIS has discretion to approve the naturalization, or deny it without deportation, or deny with deportation. With discretion, there will be some inconsistency.But deportation has no statute of limitation. It is hard for me to understand
USCIS can be that inconsistent on such important matter. Inconsistency can be expected but I don't buy it if difference can be that huge as deportation vs citizenship approval
Voting by a noncitizen is not a mandatory deportable offense. If it happened outside the 5-year window, USCIS has discretion to approve the naturalization, or deny it without deportation, or deny with deportation. With discretion, there will be some inconsistency.
However, they are consistent about denying naturalization when the voting occurred within the 5-year window (assuming the voting was not a local election for which the LPR actually was eligible to vote).
It has been shown that some DMVs added applicants to the voter registration list without the applicant ever having to sign any declaration of US citizenship.
I believe this has happened. Every time DMV has asked me to register my answer was "NO, I am not a citizen" and my answer to if I want to be an organ donor was "Yes". I hope to God that they did not mix up my answers . One more thing to worry about I guess . What happens if you, somehow, get registered to vote, but you never vote? I am sure the ramifications are not as bad as compared to the person actually voting, but still I believe it will be a hassle with the N400 application and delay the process.
Al Southner: Your comments are extremely distasteful. "...bolster his shredded body parts" ???!!! What were you thinking?
Technically that's true, as the law allows the enforcement agencies to opt out of enforcing against an individual. A better word than "mandatory" would be "automatic". USCIS policies and procedures would automatically lead to initiating removal for something serious like armed robbery or murder, while permitting the officers to exercise discretion for less serious deportable offenses like voting.I don't think there any law that say some deportable offense are mandatory deportable offenses and other deportable offenses are not mandatory deportable offenses. Laws just say certain offense are deportable.
Ok. I see you were really worked up over that issue. There is a reason why these wars continue while we eat and drink with no regards for the real causes to families across this country. See the carnage caused by war, do you think life is as simple as being concerned about a greencard?
http://mindprod.com/politics/iraqwarpix.html#IRAQWARPIX
However, the law and courts have classified some offenses as mandatory bars to naturalization, and USCIS does not have discretion to naturalize people who have done those things, even though they have discretion to decide not to pursue deportation.
Technically that's true, as the law allows the enforcement agencies to opt out of enforcing against an individual. A better word than "mandatory" would be "automatic". USCIS policies and procedures would automatically lead to initiating removal for something serious like armed robbery or murder, while permitting the officers to exercise discretion for less serious deportable offenses like voting.