New York SESA Tracker

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Visa Stamping

One of my friend went to Calgary for visa stamping. He waited 4 weeks for background clarification. He is from Pakistan.
Does they have different waiting/background checking criterias for different countries? I am planning to go for my 8th year visa stamping, but cannot afford 4 weeks waiting time.
 
proof of filing

zgubi said:
when was this? was it a 7th year extension?

Also, what was the best way for you to reserve Montreal? I tried it for 3.5 weeks from now, but it's all booked. I reserved Ottawa instead. Can I change on Internet (nvars.com) to Montreal without cancelling Ottawa.

I also heard Montreal does it the same day, Toronto delivers it the next business day and I have no idea for Ottawa.

Are you able to get proof of filing from Phil DOL? If not, what documentation you plan to use?
 
srikums said:
i went to ottawa in feb 2005 ...got it in 2 hrs ...if your appt is before 11 you get it on the same day...unless if your profession is one of the XXX categories like nuclear scientist in which case it can take upto a week....


Mine is at 10am. thanks so much for the info. I hope it works like that for me 2. Thanks again
 
proof of filing

I got the proof of filing from NY DOL last July. For those whose application are in Philadelphia BEC, you can get the proof of filing by writing to the foll address

United States Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
1 Belmont Avenue, Suite 200
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Phone: (484) 270-1500
Fax: (484) 270-1600

I took appoint on montreal 3 week ahead and got the visa same day in february.
Hope this helps
 
helpjune4 said:
Are you able to get proof of filing from Phil DOL? If not, what documentation you plan to use?

this is my 6th year, not 7th. just regular visa stamp stuff.

It seems that Montreal, Ottawa processing time ('regular', whatever that means) is SAME DAY, whereas Toronto processing time is 2 days. If anyone has different experience, please let me know.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this a true statement: Once you are doing 7th year extension, and they pull out your file out of the labor pile, to give you confirmation to get 7th year extension, they have resolve your labor within a year, no matter what your date of filing was. I heard this from multiple people
 
Rumors Rumors , if that is true why people files for 8th , 9th ext. ?

zgubi said:
Is this a true statement: Once you are doing 7th year extension, and they pull out your file out of the labor pile, to give you confirmation to get 7th year extension, they have resolve your labor within a year, no matter what your date of filing was. I heard this from multiple people
 
Did your attorney or you yourself requested the proof of filing?
ksurjan said:
I got the proof of filing from NY DOL last July. For those whose application are in Philadelphia BEC, you can get the proof of filing by writing to the foll address

United States Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
1 Belmont Avenue, Suite 200
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Phone: (484) 270-1500
Fax: (484) 270-1600

I took appoint on montreal 3 week ahead and got the visa same day in february.
Hope this helps
 
ahalem said:
Rumors Rumors , if that is true why people files for 8th , 9th ext. ?


this is a fair statement. However, I heard that this happened only since you need a confirmation from labor department to file for 7th year (i thought that was a fairly new thing)
 
What is going on at the Philly Backlog Center ?

What is going on at the Philly Backlog Center ?

I sent an email asking for my status on my LC ...... I have sent 2 emails to date ....

My PD is Jan 2002

1st time i sent an email in Jan 2005 and got a response (2 weeks later) of Not Yet Assigned

2nd time i sent an email April 2005 and got a response (1 month later) of Not Yet Assigned

This is getting far beyond a joke ! ....... :mad:
 
zgubi said:
Is this a true statement: Once you are doing 7th year extension, and they pull out your file out of the labor pile, to give you confirmation to get 7th year extension, they have resolve your labor within a year, no matter what your date of filing was. I heard this from multiple people

I am in my ninth year of H1 and my LC is still stuck at BEC. Absolutely no truth to this rumor.
 
Dear new-yorkers,

I have been waiting for RIR LC for more than 3 years and it seems it is forever.
I decided to apply to NIW at the end of the 2004 and I was lucky: my case has been approved today (both I-140 and I-485).

I am leaving this thread, which was very helpful for me for many years.

I wish to be lucky for everybody and get your GC soon.
 
Oberton said:
Dear new-yorkers,

I have been waiting for RIR LC for more than 3 years and it seems it is forever.
I decided to apply to NIW at the end of the 2004 and I was lucky: my case has been approved today (both I-140 and I-485).

I am leaving this thread, which was very helpful for me for many years.

I wish to be lucky for everybody and get your GC soon.


Hello Oberton:

What exactly got approved your LC or NIW and what is this NIW?

Please explain!!!!!


Best Regards
 
Hello Justwatching & the Guru's

I will like to share my experience recently with all of you Gurus.

I did emailed to the senate of my distric and asked them to find out about my case and get the case Number.

What i found from them was my case # and the fact that they got my case in BPC on May 3rd 2005 but have not yet entered in the system, and will be sending all the 45 day letters in next 4 weeks.

My PD is Dec 06, 2001,
NY

RIR EB3.


Best Regards
 
Don't shoot the messanger

06/02/2005: Clogged Foreign Labor Certification System Without Light at End of Tunnel

The reengineering of the nation's foreign labor certification system is facing a serious crisis as both the PERM program and the Backlog Reduction program reveal serious flaws. One doubts whether anyone within the DOL would have anticipated such serious problems when they had worked out this labor certification reengineering process. The nation's labor certification system is practically under seize at this time. Reportedly, the Backlog Processing Centers still have a huge number of boxes of files which have yet to be opened just for data-entry and until the data entry is completed, cases may not be adjudicated except a few oldest cases pending early 2001 or ealier than that. There is no end in sight. Since the Backlog Reduction program was first announced in the federal register, more than eight months have passed by now with no visible results and adjudication of applications. It appears that the serious flaws in planning and operation of the backlog reduction process are related to the concept of "national queue" and "FIFO." First problem existed in the management of this concept. The DOL should have known which states and which regions had the oldest backlog cases. Some small states did not even have any backlogs at all. We thought the leaders in the FLDC were aware of this issue and planned and scheduled shipment of cases from the states and regions in the order of assumedly heaviest backlog locations. As we all know it, San Francisco was picked first for this reason. If this plan worked perfectly, the oldest San Francisco cases should have been gone out of the labor certification processing pipelines while back. The same should be true with other earlier shipment state cases. The current backlog in opening boxes and completing data entries for later shipped cases from the least backlog states should not have halted the adjudication process for the earlier shipped cases. It is horrendous to draw a picture of limited number of analysts and certifying officers in the Backlog Processing Centers beginning to adjudicate over 300,000 cases sometime in the future after completion of the data entries and 45-day letter processing. Supposedly, a large number of these cases are traditional regular applications which will have to go through the time-consuming supervised recruitment process. The announced schedule of 24-30 months removal of all these backlog cases may turn out to be a dream, considering the fact that over eight months have already gone by without completion of preparation phase for processing of the cases. Unless the leaders of DFLC seriously relook at the current plan, operation, and management, they may have to deal with a tough political challenge in the Congress as they will have to hand out begging additional tax-money appropriations. One wonders how the DFLC will be able to persuade the tax payers and the Congressional leaders for the additional money and failures.
 
Who Did you write to? Can you share more details.
Thanks

saburi said:
I will like to share my experience recently with all of you Gurus.

I did emailed to the senate of my distric and asked them to find out about my case and get the case Number.

What i found from them was my case # and the fact that they got my case in BPC on May 3rd 2005 but have not yet entered in the system, and will be sending all the 45 day letters in next 4 weeks.

My PD is Dec 06, 2001,
NY

RIR EB3.


Best Regards
 
saburi said:
I will like to share my experience recently with all of you Gurus.

I did emailed to the senate of my distric and asked them to find out about my case and get the case Number.

What i found from them was my case # and the fact that they got my case in BPC on May 3rd 2005 but have not yet entered in the system, and will be sending all the 45 day letters in next 4 weeks.

My PD is Dec 06, 2001,
NY

RIR EB3.


Best Regards


Thanks for the update.

I have a question for you. The only way they can give you a NEW case no. is if they entered your case into the system but you say that it wasn't entered yet? Can you clarify?

And now that you have posted your case no. May 3rd is actually the date your case was entered to the system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top