New Policy Opens US Green Card Doors for TN Holders

nancyliu

Registered Users (C)
any comments on the following article? Is the authoritative letter from CBP as significant as the author claims?

http://www.hooyou.com/news/news021709tn.html

New Policy Opens US Green Card Doors for TN Holders

Jian Joe Zhou, Attorney at Law

A recently published authoritative letter from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) addressing the TN nonimmigrant visa category offers new and definite insight on the CBP’s policy for determining immigrant intent. In the letter, dated April 2008, the Executive Director of Admissibility and Passenger Protection Programs details clearly that filing an immigrant petition (I-140) alone is not automatically considered a demonstration of immigrant intent, and aliens with pending I-140s may still be admitted into US with a TN visa.

The TN visa is a special nonimmigrant category reserved for Canadian and Mexican citizens who are offered qualifying positions as defined under NAFTA. While some nonimmigrant visa categories like H-1B allow for dual intent, the TN category has been considered by CBP to be strict non-dual intent category that requires that applicants show nonimmigrant intent when requesting entry to the US or renewal of TN status. As a result the CBP, which is responsible for determining entry eligibility at US ports of entry, has been tough on the issue of immigrant intent and often denied entry to TN holders who have pending I-140 petitions and even some who have only filed for PERM—often the initial first step for I-140 petitions in the EB-2 and EB-3 categories.

This immigrant intent issue made it critical for TN holders who had filed I-140 immigrant petitions to file I-485 adjustment of status applications or change to H-1B status before their TN expired. However, visa retrogression—currently worldwide for the EB-3 category and significantly retrogressed for EB-2 category individuals born in China or India—made filing the I-485 concurrently with the I-140 impossible; the competitive H-1B quota, and H-1B employer sponsorship and costs issues made H-1B petition difficult. The legal consequences and risks of maintaining TN after filing PERM or I-140 often deters TN holders from submitting these applications. Even with the recent 3-year validity extension for the TN category, some TN holders without readily available visa numbers faced the possibility of later losing valid status or being unable to travel with TN while their green card application was pending.

With the CBP new guidelines, TN status holders can apply for employment-based immigrant benefits through EB-2 or EB-3 (either PERM or EB-2 NIW), even if visa numbers are not available. They also do not need to change to H-1B. They can now remain in TN until they file for I-485 adjustment of status or consular processing when visa numbers become available. TN holders can extend TN in the US with USCIS, be admitted into US with their valid TNs after travel overseas, and apply for new TN status; filing PERM or I-140 immigration petition will not automatic jeopardize their reentry or valid status. Once they have filed their I-485 applications, they can get advance parole documents to allow them to travel.

Please note, CBP’s guidelines do not make TN a complete dual intent visa/status. TN visa holders still need to maintain their foreign residency.

The policy guidelines expand the opportunities for TN visa holders to obtain a green card through the EB-2 and EB-3 categories. China- and India- born TN visa holders can apply for a green card through the EB-2 NIW or EB-2 PERM category while they are in TN status, even though an immigration visa is not available, and all qualified TN holders can apply in the EB-3 category despite visa numbers being unavailable worldwide. This is a significant benefit because a priority date is established when a PERM labor certification or immigrant petition is filed. Thus these, previously restricted, TN holders can establish an earlier priority date and shorten the lengthy wait time for an available visa number.
 
I am sure there are a lot of errors. I am suspicious. That's why I am posting it here. But I am not sure that it should be ignored completely. There must be a letter from CBP. I would like to know what exactly it means as it will affect some TN holders' decision whether to switch to H1B.

This is so full of errors that it is unworthy of any analysis. Ignore completely.
 
Look, nothing in the article you mention is new, and the rest is incorrect.

All of us on this site know that I-140 does not preclude getting I-140, that one can go from TN to GC without H1-B (and ahave for 10 years).

There never has been a restriction on filing perm, regardless of where the Cdn citizen os born.

and if the letter was so groundbreaking, where is it posted....

This is pure legal tripe
 
Do you mean "I-140 does not preclude getting TN"? So one can renew his TN even if he has file I-140?

Look, nothing in the article you mention is new, and the rest is incorrect.

All of us on this site know that I-140 does not preclude getting I-140, that one can go from TN to GC without H1-B (and ahave for 10 years).

There never has been a restriction on filing perm, regardless of where the Cdn citizen os born.

and if the letter was so groundbreaking, where is it posted....

This is pure legal tripe
 
Do you mean "I-140 does not preclude getting TN"? So one can renew his TN even if he has file I-140?

A TN holder can perfectly renew TN status after the I-140 has been applied or even approved. Because it is your sponsoring employer who applies for I-140 for the employee, not the employee himself.

It is the I-485 Adjustment of Status that triggers your immigration intent. since it is filed by the employee. Can you see the difference? It has been discussed a lot here already.

Since the above-mentioned letter doesn't mention anything new between the I-485 and TN, it is no use for us. Plus, like Nelsona said, the letter is full of errors. I would definitely think twice before going to that attorney who crafted it.
 
Forgive my ignorance. Why does every lawyer I consult says that it is risky for a TN holder to apply for permanent residency if he needs to renew his TN before he acturally can file I-485 and get an EAD during the lengthy process? The reason is that his renewal of TN may be denied because he has filed I-140.

Could you please tell me if in practice, it is common and easy to renew TN (both at the border and through mail-in application) after filing I-140?

Now that TN has a 3 year duration, this is not a problem for those who were born in the country which has a current priority date. For those whose priority date is not current, it can be years between filing I-140 and filing I-145/EAD/AP after the priority date becomes current. Then, going from TN to permanent residency directly is not practical if there is a good chance that TN renewal will be denied after filing I-140.

Um, yeah. We've known, shown, and explained this for years now.
 
I just subscribe Mr. Grasmick's news group. According to Mr. Grasmick, there is indeed such a memo and it does make the direct TN to Green Card path easier. While it is not as groundbreaking as Mr. Zhou claims, it is not as worthless as Nelsona thinks.

Quote from Mr. Grasmick:

This information is important because:

-It is recent.
-It has impact. Although there are similar memos already, this one comes
from the newer "USCBP" agency, rather than the old "INS".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I got the same e-mail, It truly adds nothing.

In fact, if you read the original letter, the petitioner was asking if the SPOUSE of an I-140 beneficiary could get a TN. This has never been questioned.

You have to remember that immigration lawyers, when times are tough, try to drum up business by introducing 'new' and 'fresh' info.

There is absoutely nothing new in this memo.

Besides, USCBP only handles border petitions, are you now going to 'wonder' if I-129s, which are handled by USCIS, are going to be accepted.
 
It is this sentence that is important no matter what the context is:

"After reviewing applicable law for North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) applicants for admission, it is our determination that the mere
filing or approval of an immigrant petition does not automatically
constitute intent on the part of the beneficiary to abandon his or her
foreign residence.".

Anyway, you do have a point.


I got the same e-mail, It truly adds nothing.

In fact, if you read the original letter, the petitioner was asking if the SPOUSE of an I-140 beneficiary could get a TN. This has never been questioned.

You have to remember that immigration lawyers, when times are tough, try to drum up business by introducing 'new' and 'fresh' info.

There is absoutely nothing new in this memo.

Besides, USCBP only handles border petitions, are you now going to 'wonder' if I-129s, which are handled by USCIS, are going to be accepted.
 
I think that residence here means residency, not an address.


^ ay, yay! yay!!...what difference does it make...this conversation is going nowhere...:confused:

I was asked for canadian residency in 2004, I wrote my mom's address, since I had terminated an apt lease in order to relocate into USA...nobory raised an eyebrow...was it an address? YES, did it establish my canadian residency as per USCIS needs? YES...case closed...<<headshakes side-2-side>>
 
Zhang spilled forth: "TN visa holders still need to maintain their foreign residency"

What garbage!
 
Top