I checked with him yesterday, his case hasn't updated since FP , case status still show online.Citi2007 said:LKBECTZ: Any news about your neighbor? Case status disappeared yet?
I checked with him yesterday, his case hasn't updated since FP , case status still show online.Citi2007 said:LKBECTZ: Any news about your neighbor? Case status disappeared yet?
Citi2007 said:Thanks alt & LKBECTZ.
See its_me_73's post at -
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=227111
its_me_73 said:It stinks. Anyway, I also setup an INFOPASS on the 5th. So, if they do not allow me to interview, I would speak to an immigration officer for further details. Thanks.
Alex_I said:Received interview letter today, 4 months exactly after my FP date. Interview is on 11/2.
It's 4 weeks since FP for my wife and no change in her status yet.
Congrats! Please share your interview experience and your wife's case, thanks!Alex_I said:Received interview letter today, 4 months exactly after my FP date. Interview is on 11/2.
It's 4 weeks since FP for my wife and no change in her status yet.
sy2006 said:citi2007 & its_me_73:
At the time of applying for N-400, every applicant should have enough understanding of the fact that it is not advisable to provide the INS with the opportunities to delay the applications because of the applicants error. I am not sure why the two of you were not able to count the numbers accurately, but if done correctly, you may not have created an additional wait in this regards.
Any way, best of luck to both of you in this regards. Hopefully, the wait will not be very longer. And dont take my remarks personally.
sy2006 said:citi2007 & its_me_73:
At the time of applying for N-400, every applicant should have enough understanding of the fact that it is not advisable to provide the INS with the opportunities to delay the applications because of the applicants error. I am not sure why the two of you were not able to count the numbers accurately, but if done correctly, you may not have created an additional wait in this regards.
Any way, best of luck to both of you in this regards. Hopefully, the wait will not be very longer. And dont take my remarks personally.
sy2006 said:citi2007 & its_me_73:
As I requested in my earlier posting, PLEASE DO NOT TAKE IT PERSONALLY, but unfortunately that was not the case, and please accept my apology in this regards. What I was trying to suggest was that it was very clear from the timelines posted by a number of applicants in this forum that almost everybody was getting the interview letter withing 90 days of applying for the N400 and their interviews were also scheduled for dates withing 90 days of the application receiving date. Just trying to clarify my opinion here. The purpose of these forums are to help the future applicants and I am sure with this situation, future applicants will definitely check their numbers in this regards as well. Once again, if you two are offended, please accept my apology. My best wishes to both of you and others for successful interviews and early oath dates.
sy2006 said:citi2007:
Historically speaking, it used to take several years to get to the interview phase. And in that scenario, applying 90 days before the 5 year mark was not a problem. However, the processing time has been reduced so much and with your experience, it has gained more importance for the 90 day thing. Personally, I applied several months after my five year deadline. And for me, the whole process from mailing the application to the oath taking took me less than 5 months. And it is not just me, I know of several applicants with similar results.
In my opinion, unless it is an emergency kind of situation, the applicants should wait till they are through with their 5 year waiting period. This is just my opinion. Best regards and good luck
houstonian-tx said:I agree with sy2006. Two years ago (applied few months past the 5 year anniversary date) my process took only 130 odd days from application to Oath in Houston. Looks like the length of time taking to process is only getting better day by day. In my opinion, applicants from Houston area should not apply earlier than 45 days before their 5 year anniversary.
its_me_73 said:Well, I must agree that suggestions are good. However, it's a problem with the service center, TSC in this case. All TSC needs to do is to check the Date before issuing interview letter. The interview letters are system generated anyway. So, the computer program that they run to generate the letters needs to be little bit smarter!! Hopefully, someone at TSC will figure it out sooner than later.
zensea said:PD: Oct 20, 2005
FingerPrint: Nov.30, 2005
Interview: Jan 5, 2006
Pending due to Name Check