Communication/language barrier is being used and believe USCIS will find that you want to find excuses. The first case involves domestic violence against you, I would assume that pushing or shoving your spouse against the wall was misunderstood to be "I love you very much honey"? The state failed to make a reasonable case, which is all fine but doesn't nullify the issue of perception. The second one involves you trying to get laid by a prostitute, again the officer didn't understand that you weren't trying to buy a vagina, but rather you want to rub it to comfort yourself? Once again, for immigration purposes that bar is lower than in any criminal or civilians courts, you have two cases which have huge implications for your morals. Any IO would reasonable conclude that your records were expunged, but the actions still remain in place. The issues here is that you exhibited violence towards your spouse, the court found you NOT guilty, but USCIS, especially some IO, might want to ensure they don't allow violent people to scrape through the system. Second case is that you used poor moral judgement in an attempt to get screwed by a prostitute, the immigration question specifically ask this question because America has problems with whores. In each state, there are women and men selling their bodies and transporting venereal diseases. The prostitution question is the one which packs a dynamite to tank your application. You might NOT like what I write, but think about it in an objective way. It is possible USCIS officer reviewing your case might NOT find out that you once try to give yourself to a prostitute, but if they know and see that you claim you never tried to have a piece of a hooker, your applicant is going to be denied and rough seas will visit you at home...
