JuanSorano61 said:Thank you.
Juan
Juan,
I am sorry if gave you an impression that I endorse your views, because I am not,
JuanSorano61 said:Thank you.
Juan
JuanSorano61 said:we cannot get a financial aid from the government.
Juan
JuanSorano61 said:Thank you. Yes, I do not want to stay illegal. I want to be able to walk down the street without fear. I worked very hard to learn English and I do not cause trouble here. I also think my other friends are not correct when they waive the flag of Mexico at the march. I bring an American flag, and I love this country.
My country is poor. In my town, I cannot make money like I do here. I am sure you have good education from where you are from, and it helps you stay here. I never went to college and learn computer from the library class. I learned English at the local school. I want to get a visa like you but I cannot.
You cannot compare two countries. My country and this country are different. This is my new country, and I want to stay. I want to get citizenship.
Juan
atlfp said:Hi Juan,
Most people in this forum came here legally and their life/career are being greatly affected by 245i. So in a way you guys messed us up. Now that when the Congress works on the bill, the non controversial part is again being put into limbo states because of the controversial part, so here you might just mess us up again.
I am not saying that nobody feels your pain, also there is no argument that most of you are harding working decent people. However the climate here is that if you go too far to demand what you want (and may well deserve), somebody else gets hurt.
Hope you understand that.
kamrans said:I think most of us dont have any problem with 245(i) except that they are using the quote assigned for the legal immigration.
Within a quota of 140,000 annually if I see 350000 people come before me then I do have problem. Legal and illegal immigration cannot be compared in any respect. Its a long debate and I dont want to get into it.
Employment based provisions are in almost all bills. Nobody is against it even Peter King from New york but they are not passing it as a separate bill.
I still dont understand why its a part of illegal immigration.
We all now know that it was a mistake from Clinton administration that without any separate quota they approved 245(i) legislation and now we are totally screwed.
Someone needs to clear this mess......
atlfp said:By mixing something of 30% chance and something of 90% chance together, one can get a total of 60% chance (or just 51%) and get the controversial part passed.
You have a point, but if it wasn't for the illegal immigrants and the 245i legislation, most of us who have been waiting 3+ years would have had our green cards already and there wouldn't be a great need for an immigration bill now.saras76 said:Guys,
Lets wake up and face reality. The only reason our legal provisions are even being considered is because of the 11 million illegal aliens problem. If there were no illegal immigrants here then there would never be ANY immigration bill.
Jackolantern said:You have a point, but if it wasn't for the illegal immigrants and the 245i legislation, most of us who have been waiting 3+ years would have had our green cards already and there wouldn't be a great need for an immigration bill now.
unitednations said:Maybe, I took this in the wrong direction or the meaning didn't come out the correct way.
It looks like the pressure the undocumented workers are putting on the government is starting to backfire on them.
We all think we are doing things the correct way. Many of the undocumented workers aren't just people who crossed the border. They come from all walks of life; came across the border; overstayed their visas, inadvertenly overstayed; employer didn't file h-1. There is a whole mixed bag of people in this.
From what I am seeing; it looks like we the "legals" are trying to distance ourselves and educate our neighbors, politicians, etc. that we are different and we should be taken care of first. We are afraid that if there is a plan to legalize whether it is a guest worker program where they have to leave after a certain point and then come back or they get citizenship after a certain point of time; then it will cause more delays for us from uscis point of view because of the abundance of work and maybe even a standstill and the increased levels of checks.
However, keep in mind that we have been trying to do things the right way but we can just as easily fall into the same trap and get out of status and our thought process may not be the same as it is.
With regards to the constitution. It is a basic fact that many of the questions we are asked at consular interviews, uscis forms are generally not verifiable. However, it is used by uscis, government agencies later if we fall under the miscroscope and they will start delving into our immigration forms to see inconsistencies or they start trying to verify the information. Best example is when they started deporting peole after 9/11 who didn't do address changes on their ar-11, on their advance paroles specified a different country then the one they actually went to.
With regards to me breaking the law; I stole a candy bar when I was nine years old, hit a parked car without leaving a note on the windshield, used my neighbors wireless signal, didn't renew my car insurance on time and knowingly drove without it;
jackolantern, your point is well taken. However, the undocumented is the big issue here. I am afraid that whatever controls uscis puts on them to catch them or scrutinize their applications will impact everyone.
When I try to trace uscis behaviour and scrutiny of immigration; i traced it to 245i labors and terrorism. All the denials for ability to pay were really targeted at parking lots, gas stations, convenience stores that filed labors for all the 245i's. However, they couldn't pick and choose who they wanted to subject the scrutiny to. They started to scrutinize the "non 245i" labors in the same way and many people got denied who had legitimate cases because uscis couldn't treat the two differently.
Whether we like it or not; i think we are married with the undocumented workers
Bella Blues said:There was a comment on the first page that the politicians realistically have nothing to gain from legal residents/immigrants because we already pay our taxes and etc.
Well, the population of the United States is 298,444,215 (July 2006 est.) minus the 11,000,000 illegal immigrants, that's 287,444,215 legal residents (immigrants and natives) who can counter protest and show the government who really moves the economy.
I think it is because they needed an employer to sponsor them, and most employers of low-wage labor are not willing to spend that sort of time and money to sponsor them through the green card process. So the majority of the millions who were here illegally at the time remained illegal.unitednations said:A very surprising thing to me is the number of 11 million. Also, the reasonable estimate is that there was 400,000 labors filed for 245i protection in april 2001. If there were so many illegals, how come not many of them tried to legalize in this manner. It can't be that the great majority of people came after april 2001.
neocor said:What am i talking about no one gaining from legal immigrants like us.
Even fellow legal immigrants like us dont gain anything from each other.
The only people who really gain anything are fellows like us in our native country as we leave there we create a vacancy there that can be filled by someone like us.
Not to mention the dentists in India.
neo
neocor said:What am i talking about no one gaining from legal immigrants like us.
Even fellow legal immigrants like us dont gain anything from each other.
The only people who really gain anything are fellows like us in our native country as we leave there we create a vacancy there that can be filled by someone like us.
Not to mention the dentists in India.
neo