If Amin's affidavit is questioned in something, it could be questioned in anything else too. But I cannot realize what it could give to plaintiffs. Even if it is not true that random algorithm was applied at all, it is clear that what was done was not random.
However, it is not so obvious that other years everything was 100% random. Anyway, I do not see a point for plaintiffs even if Amin is lying or does not know what he is writing about.
However, it is not so obvious that other years everything was 100% random. Anyway, I do not see a point for plaintiffs even if Amin is lying or does not know what he is writing about.
Last edited by a moderator: