Laws...
chokra said:
She never called the police, and i think during the divorce process she must have been told by her lawyer that DV is not an option since she has no record of all this....and thus she accepted constructive abandoment. So after all this she got half of my money and will get monthly maitenence from me for two years. I guess the laws favor the women here. I wanted her to go back so that she can realise that what she is doing is wrong.
Cho,
I am sorry, but it seems as if you are being screwed big time. I am not aware of any situation where someone who is in the US, in technical terms, have violated their visa status, was given the right to be paid by ex-spouse for 2yrs and still remain in the US
Did you have counsel during your divorce?

You case sounds really strange, and please provide more info on your divorce case. Only if you feel comfortable about the process, because at least, one might understand the court's decision.
Laws don't favor women, good and effective representation will always safeguard your interests in the US, even if you clearly violated the law. If you didn't have good representation, then you could be suffering from the after effects of the case.
Lastly, you need to educate yourself on this immigration issues, because your ignorance is your biggest obstacle in understanding the process, and your ex-wife probably sensed this, and used your ignorance to plan whatever she needed to do. As such, your failure to know about her immigration process, is now coming to haunt you in a big way...
