StillAlive
Registered Users (C)
If this guy works in two job and still has time to spend time in the forum, then he must have extra IQ than rest of us
The other interesting fact is that if you make more than $160K but less than $300K you will have to pay more taxes if make $150K, and even IRA can not help much. Of course numbers are approximate.
The other interesting fact is that if you make more than $160K but less than $300K you will have to pay more taxes if make $150K, and even IRA can not help much. Of course numbers are approximate.
Unless the US has instituted a marginal tax rate exceeding 100% for that income band, this is completely incorrect.
nelsona said:I used to think sfmars was from San Francisco.
I am now convinced he truly is from mars. Of course his whereabouts are approximate
What's your point of saying "complete incorrect" ? Just to say something ?
Your "complete incorrect" requires correction because I presumed numbers for alone individual without dependants. What's your point of saying "complete incorrect" ? Just to say something ?
It would be like saying you are a complete moron instead of a simple moron.
Take your pick.
Yes, it's to say that you're completely incorrect.
There is no way that a person making $160k will have a lower tax liability than someone making $150k, all other things being equal.
Check the tax table.
That lists marginal rates. You are aware of how marginal rates work, right?
I am not sure what is more silly at this stage, the original poster's question or you guys arguing on a silly question.
Much disturbance in the force there is!
Stoned!