Comment to Jun 3 MOTION HEARING
Thank you for all your efforts, Mr. Khanna.
We now know that unfortunately the judge didn't rule to our favor on our motion. I've read the transcript 3 times and it seems I can identify our weakest point. Here it is:
- this can be ONLY classified as a CLASS action if TO BEAT the claim that all those EB1, EB2, EB3... whatsoever categories are essentially require different approaches and amount of time for processing.
Our purpose is either: 1) to prove that instead there is only one standard procedure FOR ALL
or 2) to find out the common procedure FOR ALL categories that causes the major delay. That is we can admit that EB1/EBn maybe treated somewhat differetly but at some point they experience the same troubles no matter where did they come from. Period.
This cannot be done without insider's information and this information is exactly what has to be requested from USCIS first of all!
Thanks again and I wish you and all of us good luck!
operations said:
Thank you for all your efforts, Mr. Khanna.
We now know that unfortunately the judge didn't rule to our favor on our motion. I've read the transcript 3 times and it seems I can identify our weakest point. Here it is:
- this can be ONLY classified as a CLASS action if TO BEAT the claim that all those EB1, EB2, EB3... whatsoever categories are essentially require different approaches and amount of time for processing.
Our purpose is either: 1) to prove that instead there is only one standard procedure FOR ALL
or 2) to find out the common procedure FOR ALL categories that causes the major delay. That is we can admit that EB1/EBn maybe treated somewhat differetly but at some point they experience the same troubles no matter where did they come from. Period.
This cannot be done without insider's information and this information is exactly what has to be requested from USCIS first of all!
Thanks again and I wish you and all of us good luck!