According to Project Kashmir,
the CSC had issued 226 RFEs to WAC03 applicants whose fingerprint will be expiring soon.
It looks good news for those WAC03 applicants.
Here is the summary table:
On the other hand, the CSC has been almost ignoring WAC02 applicants for a long time.
For a instance, the number of RFE sent/recieved status for WAC02 cases filed in January, February, and March 2002 is only 88.
Most of WAC02 applicants should have been told that the CSC would not take any action for expiration of fingerprint.
If the CSC would continue such a discrimination to WAC02 applicants,
the CSC would issue RFE to another WAC03 applicants not to expire their fingerprints,
so WAC02 applicants would have no chance until FY2005 even if the CSC would allocate enough resource to I-485 process.
I encourage all WAC02 applicants to participate in the following three campaigns.
#11a - Don Neufeld
#11b - Congressperson and Senators
#11c - Others
the CSC had issued 226 RFEs to WAC03 applicants whose fingerprint will be expiring soon.
It looks good news for those WAC03 applicants.
Here is the summary table:
Code:
WAC02 WAC03 TOTAL
----------^---^---^---
2004-03-11 7 111 118
2004-03-10 11 81 92
2004-03-09 10 33 43
2004-03-08 4 1 5
----------^---^---^---
TOTAL 32 226 258
12.4% 87.6%
For a instance, the number of RFE sent/recieved status for WAC02 cases filed in January, February, and March 2002 is only 88.
Most of WAC02 applicants should have been told that the CSC would not take any action for expiration of fingerprint.
If the CSC would continue such a discrimination to WAC02 applicants,
the CSC would issue RFE to another WAC03 applicants not to expire their fingerprints,
so WAC02 applicants would have no chance until FY2005 even if the CSC would allocate enough resource to I-485 process.
I encourage all WAC02 applicants to participate in the following three campaigns.
#11a - Don Neufeld
#11b - Congressperson and Senators
#11c - Others
Last edited by a moderator: