Good News for some WAC03 Applicants, but very Disappointed News for WAC02 Applicants
- Thread starter kashmir
- Start date
If CSC starts approving wac-03 series without touching Dec '2001 - Sept '2002 cases, how can they move the I-485 dates from Dec 16th 2001? Not sure what is their plan. Will the attorneys have any clue regarding this??
Or like the 2nd FP notices, could this have been contracted out and maybe those guys are generating RFEs in bulk. Just a thought...
Or like the 2nd FP notices, could this have been contracted out and maybe those guys are generating RFEs in bulk. Just a thought...
Last edited by a moderator:
Fingerprint - Another Discrimination to WAC02 Applicants
On 2/27/2004, the CSC had issued 639 Fingerprint Notices
to WAC-03-114 (ND 2/28/2003) thru WAC-03-159 (ND 4/29/2003)
although a lot of WAC02 applicant's fingerprints have been expired.
On 2/27/2004, the CSC had issued 639 Fingerprint Notices
to WAC-03-114 (ND 2/28/2003) thru WAC-03-159 (ND 4/29/2003)
although a lot of WAC02 applicant's fingerprints have been expired.
Last edited by a moderator:
jokerpoker_us
Registered Users (C)
needgc123,
USCIS will simply move the Dec 16th 2001 date to April 29th
2002 and claim that they have bought down the backlog to
just one year. It all depends on them. They can do anything
they want. In the election year they would like to show that
under Bush Administration they have become efficient.
USCIS will simply move the Dec 16th 2001 date to April 29th
2002 and claim that they have bought down the backlog to
just one year. It all depends on them. They can do anything
they want. In the election year they would like to show that
under Bush Administration they have become efficient.
WAC03 RFE trend continued ...
Some series but not all were scanned again last night.
Some series but not all were scanned again last night.
Code:
[B][size=5][color=purple] WAC 02 03
----------^---^---
2004-03-15 - 26
2004-03-13 - 51
2004-03-12 - 9
2004-03-11 7 129
2004-03-10 11 81
2004-03-09 10 38
2004-03-08 4 1
----------^---^---
TOTAL 32 335[/color][/size][/B]Re: Fingerprint - Another Discrimination to WAC02 Applicants
At my previous post, I missed some series that was scanned last night.
The number is 840 (not 639).
-kashmir
On 2/27/2004, the CSC had issued 840 Fingerprint Notices
to WAC-03-114 (ND 2/28/2003) thru WAC-03-159 (ND 4/29/2003)
although a lot of WAC02 applicant's fingerprints have been expired.
At my previous post, I missed some series that was scanned last night.
The number is 840 (not 639).
-kashmir
On 2/27/2004, the CSC had issued 840 Fingerprint Notices
to WAC-03-114 (ND 2/28/2003) thru WAC-03-159 (ND 4/29/2003)
although a lot of WAC02 applicant's fingerprints have been expired.
> Can you clarify what is wrong in issuing FP notices to people.
> If they issue RFEs and want to adjudicate their cases that is a concern. Right?
No, not at all.
I'd like to emphasize the following fact:
the CSC leaves fingerprint expired for a lot of WAC-02 applicants.
The CSC should issue fingerprint notices to those long-waiting applicants with expired fingerprint at first,
and of course, they have to be adjudicated in 15 months.
> If they issue RFEs and want to adjudicate their cases that is a concern. Right?
No, not at all.
I'd like to emphasize the following fact:
the CSC leaves fingerprint expired for a lot of WAC-02 applicants.
The CSC should issue fingerprint notices to those long-waiting applicants with expired fingerprint at first,
and of course, they have to be adjudicated in 15 months.
mango_pickle
Registered Users (C)
The email does not seem to be Don Rumsfeld's email. It seems to be a generic CIS email, isn't it? Did anyone get response to these emails?
fp NOTICE
I am a WAC03 applicant and revd my FP notice recently.....when we had filed in May 1st week, we were told by our lawyer that CSC has stopped issuing FP notices due to a change in rules....he said that they wud issue it only after 9 months...........thats why there is a flurry of fp notices for folks after the APr notice date.....I think they are just trying to get the 1st timers in the door.......then go off and work on the WAC02 guys......cud be a policy decision who knows........
I am a WAC03 applicant and revd my FP notice recently.....when we had filed in May 1st week, we were told by our lawyer that CSC has stopped issuing FP notices due to a change in rules....he said that they wud issue it only after 9 months...........thats why there is a flurry of fp notices for folks after the APr notice date.....I think they are just trying to get the 1st timers in the door.......then go off and work on the WAC02 guys......cud be a policy decision who knows........
List of Participants as of 3/16/2004
This week is very important.
Let's make the CSC stop discriminating long-waiting applicants.
- kashmir
- wac-02-068
- ruxrux
- gc0299
- Jitup
- needgc123
- brokenarrow
- lareds
- kadamtal
- wsxwsc
- ben2000
- ImmigrateMe
- koolkat
- GCDreamz
This week is very important.
Let's make the CSC stop discriminating long-waiting applicants.
Kashmir,
Can you explain how you know for certain they are discriminating against me a WAC-02 candidate just because their ancient batch processing system has spit out FP requests for some WAC-03 applicants, because thats what it does a certain number of days after an application has been submitted, with no regard to actual processing delays.
Can you explain how you know these WAC-03 FPs will not just expire as mine have. Are you certain that they will not send me a re-finger print request tommorrow so they can be prepared to process my application in 6-8 month time.
Sorry but I think this and some of your other campaigns are ill conceived and not helping.
You do not have the facts and therefore you are making wild acquisations, that never helps a cause.
Can you explain how you know for certain they are discriminating against me a WAC-02 candidate just because their ancient batch processing system has spit out FP requests for some WAC-03 applicants, because thats what it does a certain number of days after an application has been submitted, with no regard to actual processing delays.
Can you explain how you know these WAC-03 FPs will not just expire as mine have. Are you certain that they will not send me a re-finger print request tommorrow so they can be prepared to process my application in 6-8 month time.
Sorry but I think this and some of your other campaigns are ill conceived and not helping.
You do not have the facts and therefore you are making wild acquisations, that never helps a cause.
Hi, rjl,
Thanks for your opinion.
> Can you explain how you know ...
No, I can't.
You should ask these questions not to me but to Don Neufeld.
> You do not have the facts and ...
Of course, I don't have the fact because the CSC has not provided us the fact.
My goal is not to provide the fact to this forum members but to do something to get as many approvals as possible.
Do you want to know the fact or to get approval ?
extra_dry_gin
Registered Users (C)
Whoa, rjl. I wish you would tone down the comments in your posting. Kashmir has done a helluva job on this forum, possibly more than anybody else. It is possible to know the RFEs that have been issued. And if WAC 03s are getting the RFEs before any 02s, it surely is not right.
Just FYI, I am a 03, so it is not that I will not be secretly feeling happy that 03s ae getting picked up. But then that would be a pretty selfish view.
140_takes_4ever
Registered Users (C)
Edited!
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay I apologize my comments were hard but occassionally I think we need to slow down.
Kashmir has done a hell of a job getting this on Anna's desk and then a letter and a response from our mate Don. This is great.
But the wheels of government grind slowly and the next posts I see start with these type of comments
"Don's shameless excuse and foul act"
"Discrimination against WAC-02"
Of course I would love to have an approval but unless you have facts which you DO NOT to support these rather strong comments you will just ruin your case and destroy the position you worked so hard to build up.
So tell me to take a hike if you want but before you do take a few minutes to read some of letters you are sending and consider if the statements can be back by facts.
Thats all I wanted to say - I guess I'm not welcome hear.
Kashmir has done a hell of a job getting this on Anna's desk and then a letter and a response from our mate Don. This is great.
But the wheels of government grind slowly and the next posts I see start with these type of comments
"Don's shameless excuse and foul act"
"Discrimination against WAC-02"
Of course I would love to have an approval but unless you have facts which you DO NOT to support these rather strong comments you will just ruin your case and destroy the position you worked so hard to build up.
So tell me to take a hike if you want but before you do take a few minutes to read some of letters you are sending and consider if the statements can be back by facts.
Thats all I wanted to say - I guess I'm not welcome hear.
140_takes_4ever
Registered Users (C)
Have to agree with you on that one! Kashmir does feel a little passionately about these things. And it shows in his letters. But don't you think we have due cause to show anger? Think of it, When I first started my 485 process in 2002, they assured me for 6 months "There is no freeze, processing is carrying on as usual". After 6 approvals in 8 months, they come out and say "There was a freeze but now it is off." After another 8 months and 10 approvals later, "We will start processing in 3 months for sure". Another 10 months and 20 approvals later it is, "April is the month, just wait for it".
IF a man doesn't lose his patience in that much time he is some paragon of virtue. That is the reason why KAshmir looses his cool. Which is why his letters turn out the way they are. To add to that there is absolutely no support from people on this forum. No one wants to join in this fight that is to their advantage
RJL, it is not about not being wanted here, everyone has a right to their opinion, it is just that if you have the enthusiasm and the drive, why not help out in the campaigns and push your way through. It is not that Kashmir or any of us are unreasonable. If you read the "Don's Shameless excuse and foul act" Thread, you will see enough people asking KAshmir to tone it down. And modifying the faxes/emails from his provocative post to a more toned down version.
So join a good cause and help make a difference.
Its interesting the assumption is that becuase I don't post everyday - I am I think the phrase is "sitting on my fat ass doing nothing. "
How wrong can you be, in the last month I had a letter published in my local newspaper where there was a spirited debate about immigration, wrote to my senator, spoke to my state rep. No I don't make a big deal about it.
In life I find if some says they are going to so something you give them a chance and then give them feedback good or bad. All I'm doing is suggesting that writing a letter telling someone they are not delivering on their promise or discriminating against you WITHOUT any facts is going to make them think you are jerk and you will be ignored.
So based on two weeks of March the facts show things have improved by about 30% - no it not good enough yet but should we complain about supposed discrimination NO.
Signed.
Sitting on my fat ass waiting for my approval
How wrong can you be, in the last month I had a letter published in my local newspaper where there was a spirited debate about immigration, wrote to my senator, spoke to my state rep. No I don't make a big deal about it.
In life I find if some says they are going to so something you give them a chance and then give them feedback good or bad. All I'm doing is suggesting that writing a letter telling someone they are not delivering on their promise or discriminating against you WITHOUT any facts is going to make them think you are jerk and you will be ignored.
So based on two weeks of March the facts show things have improved by about 30% - no it not good enough yet but should we complain about supposed discrimination NO.
Signed.
Sitting on my fat ass waiting for my approval