Yes, I had Fulbright funding, this is why I post in this thread
It was MA funding for one year, I got funding for my PhD from the university.
I keep repeating again and again, in my opinion, the key to getting a waiver (my case "no objection") is to prove that by staying you are not abandoning the original goals of the program. From the IGA perspective - you have to argue that US would benefit more from you staying here. Again, you have to build your argument in the context of your original program goals.
My goal was - intercultural exchange. My argument was - I teach intercultural communication, hence, I continue with my Fulbright goals.
Other people argued that their training/skills obtained during/after Fulbright are not needed in their country anymore.
Read this forum, people can not give you advice on your specific case, but if you read carefully what successful stories say - maybe you will get some ideas. Nikovs (if I remember the nickname) was even able to beat Fulbright's objection. It all comes down to whether or not you can prove that you are valuable here. This is the key in IGA process from what I can understand.
Physicians get wavers if they agree to work in "unpopular" locations. See this there is any way for you to do the same....
By the way - what did you write in your statement? I wonder if there are any red flags that other Fulbrighters need to learn about.