Its not been 45 days yet and the office is over an hour away. I don't wanna go all the way for nothing, its like a trip.
Type of service requested:
-- Non-Delivery of Other Notice
The status of this service request is:
Your case is awaiting the required Biometrics submittal, and is currently in suspense until you complete this process. Your application information has been entered into the system which schedules applicants for biometrics at their local Application Support Center. Biometrics appointments are scheduled as slots become available at the Applications Support Centers. Once you have been scheduled for an appointment, you will receive an ASC Appointment Notice to appear at a certain date and time at your local Applications Support Center. You must take the ASC Appointment Notice and photo ID to your appointment.
If you have any further questions, please call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.
Jackolantern, I see. Its just that they're asking for the notice# which they gave me over the phone when I called, and that has the date on it that will show them its not been 45 days since I called.
Still make the Infopass to find out. Non-delivery often means they sent it but the post office returned it as undeliverable, typically due to an incorrect or incomplete or old address, either from your mistake on the forms or USCIS mistake when printing the mailing label, or the postal carrier delivered it to the wrong address and the recipient dropped it in the mail as "return to sender". But you'll need to attend the Infopass appt. to find out what really happened.So, I guess there is no need for the Infopass anymore, since they're saying the notice wasn't sent. Why is it taking so long though? Everybody else got theirs.
Well I was reading a lawyer's blog about that and he mentionned that :
I've never heard of that before, so I don't know but the whole article can be found here : sarmientoimmigration.typepad.com/blog/unlawful-presence/ ( add http in front of the address, im not allowed to post links since i have less than 15 posts, weird?)
This sounds like a "chef's secret" in the legal world which is most definately worth investigating in your case. The part that particularly intrigues me is "unless immigration comes looking for you" implying that in legalese that may translate to tacit consent on the part of USCIS to consider you as being in lawful status unless and until they start proceedings against you.
Note that the referenced lenient treatment is restricted to F-1 status and a few others that have D/S on their I-94 rather than a specific end date. For others, staying beyond the I-94 date automatically becomes unlawful presence.
Right but from what I understand even after the F1 expires and you aren't bothered by USCIS you legally remain under lawful status unless you do something else that will create problems.
Right but from what I understand even after the F1 expires and you aren't bothered by USCIS you legally remain under lawful status unless you do something else that will create problems.
I think your interpretation is incorrect. After F-1 expires, one will be out of status, but won't accumulate unlawful presence until a judge / USCIS determines that the non-immigrant has been unlawfully present. No?
But you'd be classified as "out of status" and not "unlawfully present", so you won't immediately start accumulating days of unlawful presence towards triggering the 3-year or 10-year ban.