• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2024 AOS (Adjustment of Status) Process Only

That is I want to try tomorrow. I googled two congressmen based on my zip code. I would appreciate your additional suggestions:
1. I will send an email and will go to their offices directly next day. I'm going to try to kindly push them due to lack of time for appeal. Do you believe is it possible to persuade them to email/call to FO supervisor during the week ?
2. Did I understand correctly that it makes sense to get congressional assistance while an appeal window with 30 days is opened ?
3. How usually people get known that congressional assistance helped and the case is re-opened?

Note I forgot to write up: I still see the record that my existing fingerprints will be used (dated by September 17th) in the USCIS account. Nothing more.
1. Each congressman’s office has a process in place for initiating congressional case inquiry/assistance with USCIS. I have no way of knowing how soon.
2. You have no appeal window, your denial notice makes that clear. The 30 days window you’ve been given is for filing a motion to reconsider or re-open.
3. They get notified by USCIS.
 
1. Each congressman’s office has a process in place for initiating congressional case inquiry/assistance with USCIS. I have no way of knowing how soon.
2. You have no appeal window, your denial notice makes that clear. The 30 days window you’ve been given is for filing a motion to reconsider or re-open.
3. They get notified by USCIS.
Thank you for you reply!
Regarding point 2: I meant it makes sense to ask a congressional assistance to help while 30 days is opened , doesn't it ? As I understood if the congressman even will want to help but it will happen in a month after the time window, I’ve been given is for filing a motion to reconsider or re-open, is closed, it won't help, or those two processes aren't connected?
 
Thank you for you reply!
Regarding point 2: I meant it makes sense to ask a congressional assistance to help while 30 days is opened , doesn't it ? As I understood if the congressman even will want to help but it will happen in a month after the time window, I’ve been given is for filing a motion to reconsider or re-open, is closed, it won't help, or those two processes aren't connected?
Again, the 30 days window you were given is for filing a motion. Congressional case assistance is not the same thing as filing a motion.
 
Hi all,

I have a few questions:

1. hypothetically I'm in the process of AOS that is not yet concluded but the authorized stay on B1/B2 is expiring in a month, is there any way to extend the authorized stay (maybe through Form I-539 or some other ways that I'm not aware of)?
1.a. How likely for such extension request to be approved? Just wanted to get an opinion around this if you have seen anyone who have done this before.
1.b. Assuming it will require a good reason for extension to be approved, could being an AOS applicant be used as the good reason?
2. Would extending the authorized stay have any negative effect on the AOS process?
Many thanks in advance!
 
Hi all,

I have a few questions:

1. hypothetically I'm in the process of AOS that is not yet concluded but the authorized stay on B1/B2 is expiring in a month, is there any way to extend the authorized stay (maybe through Form I-539 or some other ways that I'm not aware of)?
1.a. How likely for such extension request to be approved? Just wanted to get an opinion around this if you have seen anyone who have done this before.
1.b. Assuming it will require a good reason for extension to be approved, could being an AOS applicant be used as the good reason?
2. Would extending the authorized stay have any negative effect on the AOS process?
Many thanks in advance!
As a general rule, I do not respond to hypothetical questions or situations as it is a complete waste of my time. Also, I do not provide guidance on circumventing immigration laws. You’re currently not in the US, but you’re exploring the potential of using your visitor’s visa to enter and file for AOS. Entering the US with a preconceived intent of filing for AOS could be deemed as an abusive use of a non-dual intent NIV and a fraudulent attempt at obtaining an immigration benefit unless the preconceived intent is declared at the POE, so I’m sorry I cannot respond to the above raised questions.

Happy to assist “if” you’re already in the US and you have a change in circumstances necessitating you to file for AOS.
 
As a general rule, I do not respond to hypothetical questions or situations as it is a complete waste of my time. Also, I do not provide guidance on circumventing immigration laws. You’re currently not in the US, but you’re exploring the potential of using your visitor’s visa to enter and file for AOS. Entering the US with a preconceived intent of filing for AOS could be deemed as an abusive use of a non-dual intent NIV and a fraudulent attempt at obtaining an immigration benefit unless the preconceived intent is declared at the POE, so I’m sorry I cannot respond to the above raised questions.

Happy to assist “if” you’re already in the US and you have a change in circumstances necessitating you to file for AOS.
That is totally fair. There would be thousands of hypothetical questions to respond otherwise. I'm sorry if I've given an impression as if I'm trying to abuse this. I've already sent my DS-260 and I'm waiting for CP in my home country at the moment. But, there is a travel that's approaching for me and I just wanted to understand beforehand if, for some reason, I end up staying in the US when my CN become current, what are the options to extend the authorized stay. Anyway, if that be the case, I will ask for your and the forum's help then. Thanks again.
 
That is totally fair. There would be thousands of hypothetical questions to respond otherwise. I'm sorry if I've given an impression as if I'm trying to abuse this. I've already sent my DS-260 and I'm waiting for CP in my home country at the moment. But, there is a travel that's approaching for me and I just wanted to understand beforehand if, for some reason, I end up staying in the US when my CN become current, what are the options to extend the authorized stay. Anyway, if that be the case, I will ask for your and the forum's help then. Thanks again.
Yeah, let’s revisit the issue if and when your circumstance changes.
 
Hello everyone. Thank you very much for all your help and comments!!! Could you help to find an official resources where I can see an exact date when the bulletin with case numbers for October 2023 was published, please!? Thank you in advance!
 
Hello everyone. Thank you very much for all your help and comments!!! Could you help to find an official resources where I can see an exact date when the bulletin with case numbers for October 2023 was published, please!? Thank you in advance!
Please see the link below:
 
I'm preparing for re-filing I-485 after an erroneous denial. I have questions about med exam. So, my med exam was prepared at the last week of August 2023 (the end on August), so it will be about 70 days when the med exam was done and filing new I-485. I'm going to contact the same doctor who prepared I-693 since he has all data . Does it make sense to use previous blood tests results or they should have been expired already to being used for I-693 now? Just want to talk to the doctor about a discount for that. I would appreciate your idea.
 
Hello everyone. Thank you very much for all your help and comments!!! Could you help to find an official resources where I can see an exact date when the bulletin with case numbers for October 2023 was published, please!? Thank you in advance!
That VB was published on August 4th. See the link to the VB, the publication date is listed at the bottom of it:
 
I'm preparing for re-filing I-485 after an erroneous denial. I have questions about med exam. So, my med exam was prepared at the last week of August 2023 (the end on August), so it will be about 70 days when the med exam was done and filing new I-485. I'm going to contact the same doctor who prepared I-693 since he has all data . Does it make sense to use previous blood tests results or they should have been expired already to being used for I-693 now? Just want to talk to the doctor about a discount for that. I would appreciate your idea.
The blood tests should still be valid.

On a side note, do you mind sharing what made you decide on re-filing as against filing an I-290B which you were strongly considering or the other options you were also considering?
 
The blood tests should still be valid.

On a side note, do you mind sharing what made you decide on re-filing as against filing an I-290B which you were strongly considering or the other options you were also considering?
During almost a week I have used 4 different forums (thank you sooo much for your one!!!) to gather and learn information about DV Lottery and shared cases, also I had a chance to ask about 10 lawyers and experienced people in open forums about my situation and similar cases, and I understood that I did the worst mistake in my life hiring a lawyer , and in my particular case (I have a little case number and I have more time comparing with others) , probably, it makes sense to try an ombudsman and congressional assistance but my research showed me that it doesn't make sense to file I-290B taking into account not a significant difference in filing fees but more risks between I-290B and I-485.
Right now one thing I want to decide for myself: since I paid once my lawyer and she have all papers prepared for I-485, I have two options -
1) she can file my I-485 again but in valid period (I will pay only official fees, obviously and expectedly she didn't admit that issue is her mistake);
2) I can request her to send a prepared package of documents to me, I will double check and send it by myself.

My friend suggested me the second point (if the lawyer agrees , I don't know if she can disagree by some reason) because , as my friend believes, when USCIS notices that a client paid lawyer for a case it changes their behavior to that person like "they have money to pay a lawyer - let's do smth bad to them - and they will pay again", like you know, a personal issue. Does it make sense or this is already an overthinking ?
 
My friend suggested me the second point (if the lawyer agrees , I don't know if she can disagree by some reason) because , as my friend believes, when USCIS notices that a client paid lawyer for a case it changes their behavior to that person like "they have money to pay a lawyer - let's do smth bad to them - and they will pay again", like you know, a personal issue. Does it make sense or this is already an overthinking ?
That's just utter BS. I don't suggest you hire a lawyer, but USCIS doesn't get "personal" because you do...
 
During almost a week I have used 4 different forums (thank you sooo much for your one!!!) to gather and learn information about DV Lottery and shared cases, also I had a chance to ask about 10 lawyers and experienced people in open forums about my situation and similar cases, and I understood that I did the worst mistake in my life hiring a lawyer , and in my particular case (I have a little case number and I have more time comparing with others) , probably, it makes sense to try an ombudsman and congressional assistance but my research showed me that it doesn't make sense to file I-290B taking into account not a significant difference in filing fees but more risks between I-290B and I-485.
Right now one thing I want to decide for myself: since I paid once my lawyer and she have all papers prepared for I-485, I have two options -
1) she can file my I-485 again but in valid period (I will pay only official fees, obviously and expectedly she didn't admit that issue is her mistake);
2) I can request her to send a prepared package of documents to me, I will double check and send it by myself.

My friend suggested me the second point (if the lawyer agrees , I don't know if she can disagree by some reason) because , as my friend believes, when USCIS notices that a client paid lawyer for a case it changes their behavior to that person like "they have money to pay a lawyer - let's do smth bad to them - and they will pay again", like you know, a personal issue. Does it make sense or this is already an overthinking ?
Glad to know you finally realized your best bet is to file a new I-485, which is what I recommended to you in my very first response to your case. It is easier and much more simple to re-file than trying to chase your tail all over the place.

Your friend's knowledge of immigration is completely off the track, you will do yourself a world of good by not listening to her - a bunch load of nonsense about USCIS being vengeful to cases utilizing the services of a lawyer. What utter nonsense!

Well, it is your call if you want to utilize the services of your lawyer again or not. This is a DIY forum, 95% of the folks who have gone through the process with the aid of this forum have successfully done so without hiring or consulting any immigration lawyer. If your case is straight forward, no out of status issues to contend with, you can read and follow instructions, in addition to being able to fill out the forms yourself, I don't see the need for the services of a lawyer. That is my simple take. As for the remaining 5%? They, like you hired the immigration lawyer before finding this forum, and a lot of them did regret hiring a lawyer in the first place.
 
Hello everyone,
This morning I got an email from KCC DV with subject line 2024xxxxxxx Diversity Visa Adjustment Letter. I assume this is the 2NL, however I didn't fill out the DS260 yet, I am waiting for my number to get close so I can make sure that my number will become current. Also,I paid the 330 but I didn't receive the receipt yet.
1) is this in fact the 2nl ?
2) do I still need to submit DS260 even after I receive the 2NL?

Thank you for your help
SmartSelect_20231102_111550_Foxit PDF Editor.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone,
This morning I got an email from KCC DV with subject line 2024xxxxxxx Diversity Visa Adjustment Letter. I assume this is the 2NL, however I didn't fill out the DS260 yet, I am waiting for my number to get close so I can make sure that my number will become current. Also,I paid the 330 but I didn't receive the receipt yet.
1) is this in fact the 2nl ?
2) do I still need to submit DS260 even after I receive the 2NL?

Thank you for your help
View attachment 4428
1. Yes that is your 2NL.
2. No you do not need to if you do not wish to submit it.
 
Hi everyone, I am currently on an L1 visa in the States. Unfortunately I have a relatively high CN 2024EU51XXX. As a Selectee for DV 2024, can I still apply for the DV 2025 program (precautionary measure in case my CN is too high) or would this have a negative impact on the AOS process if my CN becomes current in time for the 2024 fiscal year. The deadline for DV25 application is November 7.
 
Hi everyone, I am currently on an L1 visa in the States. Unfortunately I have a relatively high CN 2024EU51XXX. As a Selectee for DV 2024, can I still apply for the DV 2025 program (precautionary measure in case my CN is too high) or would this have a negative impact on the AOS process if my CN becomes current in time for the 2024 fiscal year. The deadline for DV25 application is November 7.
Yes you can submit an entry for DV2025. No impact on your current selection or whichever processing option you’re choosing.
 
Top