• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2021 AOS Only

Hello I have a question, I am sorry if it was answered before.

Can I go try to do a walk in Bio in a different city than the city where is the FO thats handling my case? My case is handled in Nashville (where I study) but I am now in Salt Lake City (Where I am doing an internship during the summer up to the 3rd of September). I got the NOA 3 weeks ago and I havent received the bio or interview letters.
 
Got the acceptance text from USCIS

Received at Chicago lockbox = 25th June 2021
USCIS Acceptance text = 8th July 2021

This was my second package after my first package was rejected on June 17th 2021 and received by me on June 23rd 2021

Now starts the wait for bio and interview.
Congrats with that step passed!!

For some reason they haven’t accepted mine one yet (was delivered by 10am 18th June and signed by Chyba).

Did you add cover letter? I used tags on the bottom of pages to separate docs, but didn’t add cover letter.
 
Hello I have a question, I am sorry if it was answered before.

Can I go try to do a walk in Bio in a different city than the city where is the FO thats handling my case? My case is handled in Nashville (where I study) but I am now in Salt Lake City (Where I am doing an internship during the summer up to the 3rd of September). I got the NOA 3 weeks ago and I havent received the bio or interview letters.
Yes you can.
 
Hello I have a question, I am sorry if it was answered before.

Can I go try to do a walk in Bio in a different city than the city where is the FO thats handling my case? My case is handled in Nashville (where I study) but I am now in Salt Lake City (Where I am doing an internship during the summer up to the 3rd of September). I got the NOA 3 weeks ago and I havent received the bio or interview letters.
Note that you need a bio letter for a walk in.
 
Hi, please I want to know if anyone in this forum was interviewed for "AOS" while he is "pending asylum" and he approved?
Note: I did not violate the stay period before I applied for asylum.
 
Hi, please I want to know if anyone in this forum was interviewed for "AOS" while he is "pending asylum" and he approved?
Note: I did not violate the stay period before I applied for asylum.
Check the timeline tab of the AOS spreadsheet, which is linked in the first page. There are links for interviews as well.
 
Hi Mom,

I called USCIS yesterday and request to expedite the process. The representative was very helpful and understood my problem (about the time) well. She said she will put the request and they will inform me within 5 days or so about the expedited decision. Yesterday evening I got the update saying expedite request has been submitted. I forgot to mention the case of my wife, who is applying with me, I am the principal applicant. The update came for mine only, does this matter? Or I need to call them again and tell them about her case as well. I believe being a principal applicant, if they expedite mine then my wife should go with it. They might reject the expedite request but just wanted to make sure if it goes through.
On what basis did you request to expedite ?
 
Hello
I would like to share some information I found online and get someone’s opinion on it. For people that have pending asylum status for a long time due to backlogs in asylum offices, can they claim that the reason for not maintaining status is due to technical difficulties on the ucis end? This is assuming they filed for asylum in a timely manner and did not have any overstay. My main point is, is it possible to bring a document to interview of some sort that supports the fact that the person does not have status due to delays? Also would telling the io about other acceptances in other states for the same situation be helpful ?
 
Congrats with that step passed!!

For some reason they haven’t accepted mine one yet (was delivered by 10am 18th June and signed by Chyba).

Did you add cover letter? I used tags on the bottom of pages to separate docs, but didn’t add cover letter.
My 2nd package was also signed for by Chyba around 10 AM - I'd sent it with Fedex.

Yes - I had a cover letter, but I did not reference the rejected first package in it.

I did not have tags across all the documents - but I marked the important ones like my current US H1B visa copy and current passport copy using inked text to help distinguish against copies of my older US visas and expired passports.

And this time, I didnt use staples or money orders + credit card form, purely paper clips and 1 x cashier's check.
 
Hi, please I want to know if anyone in this forum was interviewed for "AOS" while he is "pending asylum" and he approved?
Note: I did not violate the stay period before I applied for asylum.
Some were approved, some were denied. Take a look at the past timeline spreadsheets or the “DV Incident Tracker” spreadsheet (see link in my signature) for a compilation of some of those cases.
 
Hello
I would like to share some information I found online and get someone’s opinion on it. For people that have pending asylum status for a long time due to backlogs in asylum offices, can they claim that the reason for not maintaining status is due to technical difficulties on the ucis end? This is assuming they filed for asylum in a timely manner and did not have any overstay. My main point is, is it possible to bring a document to interview of some sort that supports the fact that the person does not have status due to delays? Also would telling the io about other acceptances in other states for the same situation be helpful ?
Since you haven’t provided any detail about your specific situation and your question is of a general nature so to say, it is hard to narrow down the response in this case, so my response is going to be of a general nature too. My guess is you’re referring to the No Fault Provision exemption clause, specifically the Technical Violation Resulting from Inaction of USCIS which says:
One example of the phrase “a technical violation resulting from the inaction of USCIS” is where an applicant ceases to have a lawful status because USCIS failed to adjudicate a properly and timely filed request to extend or change nonimmigrant status.

Since the IO can already verify a technical violation resulting from USCIS inaction or oversight through review of USCIS systems and the Record of Proceeding prior to your interview, you’ll need to be able to convincingly demonstrate one of the following to the IO in order for that clause to apply:
  • The applicant properly filed an application to extend or change nonimmigrant status prior to the expiration date of his or her nonimmigrant status;
  • The applicant was a bona fide nonimmigrant at the time of filing his or her application to extend or change nonimmigrant status, which includes establishing intent consistent with the terms and conditions of the nonimmigrant status sought;
  • The applicant filed an application to extend or change nonimmigrant status that was meritorious in fact, not frivolous or fraudulent, or otherwise designed to delay removal or departure from the United States;
  • The applicant has not otherwise violated his or her nonimmigrant status;
  • The applicant remained a bona fide nonimmigrant until the time he or she properly filed an adjustment application; and
  • The applicant is not in removal proceedings.
 
Since you haven’t provided any detail about your specific situation and your question is of a general nature so to say, it is hard to narrow down the response in this case, so my response is going to be of a general nature too. My guess is you’re referring to the No Fault Provision exemption clause, specifically the Technical Violation Resulting from Inaction of USCIS which says:
One example of the phrase “a technical violation resulting from the inaction of USCIS” is where an applicant ceases to have a lawful status because USCIS failed to adjudicate a properly and timely filed request to extend or change nonimmigrant status.

Since the IO can already verify a technical violation resulting from USCIS inaction or oversight through review of USCIS systems and the Record of Proceeding prior to your interview, you’ll need to be able to convincingly demonstrate one of the following to the IO in order for that clause to apply:
  • The applicant properly filed an application to extend or change nonimmigrant status prior to the expiration date of his or her nonimmigrant status;
  • The applicant was a bona fide nonimmigrant at the time of filing his or her application to extend or change nonimmigrant status, which includes establishing intent consistent with the terms and conditions of the nonimmigrant status sought;
  • The applicant filed an application to extend or change nonimmigrant status that was meritorious in fact, not frivolous or fraudulent, or otherwise designed to delay removal or departure from the United States;
  • The applicant has not otherwise violated his or her nonimmigrant status;
  • The applicant remained a bona fide nonimmigrant until the time he or she properly filed an adjustment application; and
  • The applicant is not in removal proceedings.
I apologize for being too general. My situation is that I applied for asylum from a tourism visa. I applied before my 6 months of stay was over but after getting work permit, everything stalled and I have been waiting for about 4 years now with no updates. I applied in 2016 for reference before the changes to how they are going to interview for asylum. I’m a little confused but would I fall under the first clause listed ?
 
Hello Everyone,

For the people who have contacted USCIS and Congressperson before, could I know how you contacted either of them properly? Is it through the email or by calling them? I tried to live chat with an USCIS agent and he/she said that I cant have expedite request since its not meeting the conditions. Specifically, I want to enquire about the Bio appointment. Thank you.
 
Hello Everyone,

For the people who have contacted USCIS and Congressperson before, could I know how you contacted either of them properly? Is it through the email or by calling them? I tried to live chat with an USCIS agent and he/she said that I cant have expedite request since its not meeting the conditions. Specifically, I want to enquire about the Bio appointment. Thank you.
I searched for representative in my area and in their website I found a email section and drop down to what you need help with (Immigration, federal agency etc.) then just wrote about my case delaying they replied back in a few days with a consent form to contact USCIS on my behalf. I would like to say I waited for 70 days after NOA before I did that and the main reason I did it is because I have follow-to-join case.
 
I apologize for being too general. My situation is that I applied for asylum from a tourism visa. I applied before my 6 months of stay was over but after getting work permit, everything stalled and I have been waiting for about 4 years now with no updates. I applied in 2016 for reference before the changes to how they are going to interview for asylum. I’m a little confused but would I fall under the first clause listed ?
I don't know, that will be for the IO to determine. Others who have been denied in the past did timely file for asylum prior to the expiration of their admitted status just like you. The truth is they will be looking at the totality of circumstance in making whatever decision they eventually come to and not just one thing. They may look into if the "timely filed application" is a frivolous one or not, to start with. They may look into whether an applicant has engaged in a misrepresentation when they obtained their NIV/at the POE or not. They will be looking into several factors
 
I searched for representative in my area and in their website I found a email section and drop down to what you need help with (Immigration, federal agency etc.) then just wrote about my case delaying they replied back in a few days with a consent form to contact USCIS on my behalf. I would like to say I waited for 70 days after NOA before I did that and the main reason I did it is because I have follow-to-join case.
Same with me. I also have a follow to join case. I searched my representative, but there was not a contact them via the web itself. However, they have mentioned to email them. Maybe I could email to that address. Thank you.
 
I don't know, that will be for the IO to determine. Others who have been denied in the past did timely file for asylum prior to the expiration of their admitted status just like you. The truth is they will be looking at the totality of circumstance in making whatever decision they eventually come to and not just one thing. They may look into if the "timely filed application" is a frivolous one or not, to start with. They may look into whether an applicant has engaged in a misrepresentation when they obtained their NIV/at the POE or not. They will be looking into several factors
If you don’t mind me asking, I don’t understand what the last part means about the NIV at the POE?
Also would bringing a document outlining the No Fault provision to interview be helpful or would the IO already be aware of it ?
thank you for your response and assistance it is greatly appreciated.
 
If you don’t mind me asking, I don’t understand what the last part means about the NIV at the POE?
Also would bringing a document outlining the No Fault provision to interview be helpful or would the IO already be aware of it ?
thank you for your response and assistance it is greatly appreciated.
NIV = Non-Immigrant Visa
POE = Port of Entry
They may review the information you provided when you applied for your visitor’s visa and/or when you were admitted into the US to see if you lied at any point in time.

The onus is on you to take anything and everything you think may be of help to your case when you go for your interview.

I honestly don’t think it’s a case of presenting a simple piece of paper/document to demonstrate one is eligible to be considered under the no fault provision. Like I previously stated, the IO will be looking at the totality of the circumstance. One other thing the IO will probably take into consideration is the likelihood of the filed asylum application being approved if it had been adjudicated a year or two ago. If it turns out to be an asylum application that cannot be approved, the no fault clause will not apply since being out of status retroactively applies to when your authorized stay expired 4 years ago in that case.
 
Last edited:
Dear Mom,

I just want to share some updates: I was going through timeline and realized that a fellow applicant from my FO, who filled 8 days after me, has already received his interview letter a week ago. I contacted USCIS to see if they have scheduled my bio/interview. The tier 1 agent said that my FO has categorized my application as family-based and the average processing time for that is 2 years. She also said that my expedite request 10 days ago was hence rejected. I told her that it is not correct and the whole processing time for DV based is 12 month. She was understanding and agreed to file a case inquiry on my behalf to my FO for wrongful categorization of my application. She was willing to file another expedite request but based on the discussion here, I wanted to wait a while and also see the outcome of this inquiry. So I declined but as it has been 6 weeks since the date on my NOA, I asked for a tier 2 call back to discuss my bio letter. She did that and said to mention the possible wrongful categorization of my application to the tier 2 as well.
 
Top