• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2020 All Selectees

This challenge was rejected because the advocates tried to link the current EO with the October EO regarding health insurance (which is blocked), and tried to "ride" on the back of that EO. The judge told them that the two EO's are completely unrelated and that they should file a seperate challenge specific to the recent EO. Simply put, the judge put them on AP until they can present a stronger case (quite frankly, I don't know anything about law, but their case did seem very weak and rushed...)
 
Airspray said:
This challenge was rejected because the advocates tried to link the current EO with the October EO regarding health insurance (which is blocked), and tried to "ride" on the back of that EO. The judge told them that the two EO's are completely unrelated and that they should file a seperate challenge specific to the recent EO. Simply put, the judge put them on AP until they can present a stronger case (quite frankly, I don't know anything about law, but their case did seem very weak and rushed...)
Click to expand...
Where did you read that? How do you know that these are the motivation?
 
valerio74 said:
Firsts lines .
this is the article , Forbes
https://www.google.it/amp/s/www.for...ks-judge-to-stop-trump-immigration-order/amp/
Click to expand...

From that article:

It is likely a broader case against the presidential proclamation would require a new or amended complaint. The latest filing may be only the first step taken against a proclamation that suspends the entry of many new immigrants to the United States. Barring a successful lawsuit, observers expect this “60-day” suspension to prevent the entry of legal immigrants will last so long as Donald Trump is president.
Click to expand...
 
OnTheGo said:
From that article:
Click to expand...
#3,490
You're right.
The challenge was rejected because it's obvious that the EO wasn't proclaimed because of Health Insurance issues ot any other issues other than protecting great American economy (jobs) amid covid-19.
So I'm certained that if the great and expect economists come with their petition that the immigrants suspension has nothing to do with protecting the economy instead it'll help grow and recover the US ECONOMY and therfore be abolished. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru...s-economic-benefits-unclear/story?id=70383675
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200430-170208.png
    Screenshot_20200430-170208.png
    180.5 KB · Views: 33
Airspray said:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-refuses-to-block-trumps-coronavirus-green-card-freeze

There are some new quotes of judge Simon in this article and it's very bad news...

Also, in other articles, he's quoted saying that this is a matter of the Congress, not the courts...
Click to expand...
But in the other article that I read this morning is written that judge Simon didn’t accept this lawsuit because AILA tried to connect this EO to the October’s EO.
It’s not congruent the Fox’articlr with the other. So what’s the truth?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top