#3,272
Hi
I have already faced my interview. But passport is still in the embassy. CEAC status is AP but my visa approved in the interview. What will happen to my DV dream?
If we do some mathematics here ,
EO suspends immigration process for 60 days ..
Based upon April VB, 2NL were issued to winners however they didn't do their interviews due to embassies closure , these winners might get interviewed in July if circumstances get better.
Taking into consideration the 60 days suspension, May VB shall be issued by 3rd week of June 2020, allowing few more cases to get interviewed in August.
Then 1 more VB to be issued in Mid of July , allowing few more cases to get interviewed in September.
As a conclusion, before suspension we had 4 VB and now we only have 2.
Can someone advice on the above?
I'm not that familiar with other immigration programs , so if I may ask , do all other immigration process end by September 30th also , or the September is only a FY for DV ?actually, it affects many more than DV. The other obvious exclusions of significant categories are:
- families of LPRs (spouses and unmarried children are they ones they can sponsor)
- family of USC other than spouses and under 21 children (remember USCs can also sponsor parents, married children and their families, and siblings and their families. these categories alone account for many more than DV every year)
- non- health based employment based immigrant visas
I'm not that familiar with other immigration programs , so if I may ask , do all other immigration process end by September 30th also , or the September is only a FY for DV ?
Yeah apologies for the stubbornness! Someone know if a DV flight for 14 days in a country not listed for the ban can then enter the US including with this EO?Yeah we had that discussion already...not going there again
Thank Susie for the information .DV is the only one I know that actually expires at the end of the FY, however the fiscal year end matters to applicants in oversubscribed categories which have a maximum quota per fiscal year/or those from countries which hit their country quota (7% of total immigrant visas) in a fiscal year. For those people though it just delays not ends their process.
Which airline did you speak to?I contacted the american airway and they told it's not possible to board with a DV visa, D yes, but not DV
Have you read the EO?Lawyer’s words , what do you think!?
Yeah I have read that, but there is write that it’s denied the “entry” to USA for 60 days. Maybe not the issuance , people could do interview and after AP and when this ban will expire it will be ISSUED as the lawyer is writingWhich airline did you speak to?
Have you read the EO?
Which airline did you speak to?
Have you read the EO?
U
Yeah I have read that, but there is write that it’s denied the “entry” to USA for 60 days. Maybe not the issuance , people could do interview and after AP and when this ban will expire it will be ISSUED as the lawyer is writing
Yes , everywhere!!I start to see your point of view. Everywhere is stated <entry>.
Sorry - I’m not understanding what point you are trying to emphasize here? (With “entry”?)Yes , everywhere!!
Yes. If he blocked only the entry and not the issuance could be that when embassies will be able to reopen and reschedule interviews again they could doing interviews also during these 60 days of ban, am I wrong? I repeat, only if he meant Entry and not issuance.Sorry - I’m not understanding what point you are trying to emphasize here? (With “entry”?)
Well he’s blocked the entry of people who don't already have visas as of today, so it’s moot imo - an embassy is not going to issue a visa that isn’t allowed to be used - visas only have an expiry date, not a “valid from” date. But yes, I guess embassies could go ahead and interview and just put a hold on issuance until the ban is over. That makes more sense from a workload point of view (assuming they open) than just postponing everything.Yes. If he blocked only the entry and not the issuance could be that when embassies will be able to reopen and reschedule interviews again they could doing interviews also during these 60 days of ban, am I wrong? I repeat, only if he meant Entry and not issuance.