• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

Dv 2014 european winers here

ceskhermina said:
the proof http://www.loteriavizelor.com/forum/topic.php?id=615
Click to expand...

That is good to see - thanks for posting. It doesn't specifically say EU00059XXX, so it could be an AF number, but I'm personally happy to accept it is most likely a real number and EU. Given the massive increase in selectees this year it makes sense that numbers would be very high. However, I am personally not convinced that the highest numbers will get visas...
 
Sloner said:
I say it is no coincidence. I just caution you. Do not trust the opinion of the forum, people can make mistakes. See the official text. Britisimon, see how many references slapped, and you would not believe.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry Sloner, I didn't understand any of what you are trying to say there...
 
britsimon said:
That is good to see - thanks for posting. It doesn't specifically say EU00059XXX, so it could be an AF number, but I'm personally happy to accept it is most likely a real number and EU. Given the massive increase in selectees this year it makes sense that numbers would be very high. However, I am personally not convinced that the highest numbers will get visas...
Click to expand...
they are talking in romanian is normal that is a EU59XXX and is not AF59xxx
 
now that the proof that the EU59xxx is real what you think about me number i have any change ?
Click to expand...
your numbers is good. I think the worry is numbers 55000-60000.
The 59XXX one - yes I posted about that above - post 282.
Click to expand...
Ok.I respect those people who are willing to change their minds.:)
 
Seems like you missed post 276 also. I haven't changed my mind - but glad to see your smiley face....
Click to expand...
I do not believe that all cause for an interview. But even in numbers believed.
How would you explain this numbers in detail?
Click to expand...
quota may be exhausted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
he is saying:ca sa fiu mai clar , case numberul meu se termina in 00059xxx. in english is : to be more clear, me case number finish in 00059xxx
 
Those big numbers are pretty rare.
For instance, the list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...am9mTkpVVmhiRzJpTl9jLVlIaVE&usp=sharing#gid=0 contains 240 EU numbers and none of them is above 53xxx. Distribution of numbers up to 53xxx seems pretty uniform if we exclude Ukraine and Uzbekistan from the list. So, the fact that we do not have numbers between 54xxx and 59xxx in that list means there is really a tiny percentage of those numbers, if any.
This particular number seems a little bit strange, because the person reveals all digits but one (59x22). We had an example here on the forum where a number with almost all digits known was not real. Anyway, with 95% confidence we could say that probability to have a number higher than 53xxx is less than 1.25% (because 240 numbers we have in the list are all under 54000).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
raevsky said:
Those big numbers are pretty rare.
For instance, the list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...am9mTkpVVmhiRzJpTl9jLVlIaVE&usp=sharing#gid=0 contains 240 EU numbers and none of them is above 53xxx. Distribution of numbers up to 53xxx seems pretty uniform if we exclude Ukraine and Uzbekistan from the list. So, the fact that we do not have numbers between 54xxx and 59xxx in that list means there is really a tiny percentage of those numbers, if any.
This particular number seems a little bit strange, because the person reveals all digits but one (59x22). We had an example here on the forum where a number with almost all digits known was not real. Anyway, with 95% confidence we could say that probability to have a number higher than 53xxx is less than 1.25% (because 240 numbers we have in the list are all under 54000).
Click to expand...
what is this list ?
 
raevsky said:
Those big numbers are pretty rare.
For instance, the list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...am9mTkpVVmhiRzJpTl9jLVlIaVE&usp=sharing#gid=0 contains 240 EU numbers and none of them is above 53xxx. Distribution of numbers up to 53xxx seems pretty uniform if we exclude Ukraine and Uzbekistan from the list. So, the fact that we do not have numbers between 54xxx and 59xxx in that list means there is really a tiny percentage of those numbers, if any.
This particular number seems a little bit strange, because the person reveals all digits but one (59x22). We had an example here on the forum where a number with almost all digits known was not real. Anyway, with 95% confidence we could say that probability to have a number higher than 53xxx is less than 1.25% (because 240 numbers we have in the list are all under 54000).
Click to expand...

Hey Raevsky. Where did you see the 59x22 number ? In the link provided there was only 59xxx...I think.

ceskhermina - the spreadsheet seems to be from Russian/Ukrainian forum. I guess people provided their details to (similar to this forum) see what is the spread and what are their chances.


Also I have a question off topic. In general description of DV found all over the internet it states (more less) that Africa gets 50% of visas, Europe, and Asia 30% and 15% respectively. Is this a rule of thumb or is it a standard DV process? Can they change it? Has it ever been changed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey all, my number EU0012***. A quick question to the PROs out here - since all the # for Europe seem to be pretty high, and the October cut off was pretty high as well (8.000), do you think the next visa bulletin will show significantly higher numbers for November? I know we can assume n think what we want, and it might not necessarily be correct, but I'd just like to get your opinion on that!
Oh and another question: is it random that we get the CN number we get, or do you think it's allocated somehow?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top