urbanite
Active Member
Don't give up. Involve the congress person and time to think of a lawyer actually.Thanks simon, I have one infopass on thursday. Heart just broken to get the letter and heard the worst reason.
Don't give up. Involve the congress person and time to think of a lawyer actually.Thanks simon, I have one infopass on thursday. Heart just broken to get the letter and heard the worst reason.
Thanks simon, I have one infopass on thursday. Heart just broken to get the letter and heard the worst reason.
OK go armed with the policy memo and a strongly worded letter. You can fix this stupid mistake!
I have drafted the following letter for you - I would have this in hand along with the memo and a printout of the VB showing the date of publication and of course all your other paperwork such as acceptance notice and so on.
Dear "Director who doesn't read his memos" (you might want to change that)
I have today received your notice regarding my I-485 application to adjust status. In the notice you inform me that you have decide to deny my application because my application was made too early. However, it seems you are not aware of the USCIS policy allowing early submission of cases and if you would refer to the USCIS policy memo PM-602-0088 (see attached) you will see that my application was made within the early filing period defined by the policy. The policy states as follows
“As soon as a Visa Bulletin is published with advance notification of DV visa availability, then an individual with a rank cut-off number that is lower than that specified in the advance notification section may file for adjustment and the application will be considered as timely filed.”
My Case number is 2014CCXXXXX which became current in the on July 1, as announced in the June Visa Bulletin, published on May 7th, 2014. My application was filed on May 9th, 2014 so your stated grounds for denial is very clearly incorrect.
I am extremely concerned at this denial and the delay caused to me by the time your office has taken to arrive at this incorrect decision. I must ask you to act without further delay. The DV lottery for 2014 is drawing to a close and the delay is severely risking my chances of receiving a Green Card since the visas are running out. The policy memo also points out the need to complete these cases in a timely manner as visas can be exhausted prior to the September 30th deadline and it would be extremely unfair if my case was impacted by your incorrect application of the policies and rules concerning early submission.
Dear Simon, you are my life saver as I am very sad to write a word in front of my desk. I thank you thank you....... will follow your direction and mail it to FO first thing in the morning. Should I complain it to congressman and USCIS at the same time or wait a bit?
Dear Simon, you are my life saver as I am very sad to write a word in front of my desk. I thank you thank you....... will follow your direction and mail it to FO first thing in the morning. Should I complain it to congressman and USCIS at the same time or wait a bit?
Somebody would get the most polite but effective butt kicking they would ever have received.
Brits are the most qualified people to pull that off in US
I got denial letter!!!#! Because FO Director said in the letter that my visa is available in July, but I submitted the application too early on May 9. WTF? Don't they not knowing Policy memo? I can submit earlier. What should I do? Such a bad luck and joke!
the letter said "The DV visa is unavailable when you filed for adjustment of status. You have provided no evidence to indicate that an immigrant visa is immediately available to you on any other basis, you do not qualify to adjust status and therefore, USCIS must deny your form I485 (see INA 245(a)(3): an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is file.)"....." You may not appeal this decision...however, your may file a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider using form I290B, NOTICE OF APPEAR OR MOTION. (???)
That is the only reason. I am furious each time I reread it. How can a whole Field Office supervisors have no idea about this advanced submission policy?
I am just speechless. Thanks you all for your support.
OK go armed with the policy memo and a strongly worded letter. You can fix this stupid mistake!
I have drafted the following letter for you - I would have this in hand along with the memo and a printout of the VB showing the date of publication and of course all your other paperwork such as acceptance notice and so on.
Dear "Director who doesn't read his memos" (you might want to change that)
I have today received your notice regarding my I-485 application to adjust status. In the notice you inform me that you have decide to deny my application because my application was made too early. However, it seems you are not aware of the USCIS policy allowing early submission of cases and if you would refer to the USCIS policy memo PM-602-0088 (see attached) you will see that my application was made within the early filing period defined by the policy. The policy states as follows
“As soon as a Visa Bulletin is published with advance notification of DV visa availability, then an individual with a rank cut-off number that is lower than that specified in the advance notification section may file for adjustment and the application will be considered as timely filed.”
My Case number is 2014CCXXXXX which became current in the on July 1, as announced in the June Visa Bulletin, published on May 7th, 2014. My application was filed on May 9th, 2014 so your stated grounds for denial is very clearly incorrect.
I am extremely concerned at this denial and the delay caused to me by the time your office has taken to arrive at this incorrect decision. I must ask you to act without further delay. The DV lottery for 2014 is drawing to a close and the delay is severely risking my chances of receiving a Green Card since the visas are running out. The policy memo also points out the need to complete these cases in a timely manner as visas can be exhausted prior to the September 30th deadline and it would be extremely unfair if my case was impacted by your incorrect application of the policies and rules concerning early submission.
jj777,
I say get a lawyer, just because these idiots all of a sudden start to behave when they see a "Esq" after somebody's name.
You don't have time to waste! You need to fight at several fronts. Keep the contact with congressperson. If your congressperson has visiting hours, make an appointment and go there in person. Make sure you talk to a person.
Talk to the ombudsperson too.
This is an opportunity of a life time. Don't give it up so easily. Fight it out! Fight!
Simon, I think it's best to emphasize right in the first paragraph or the first sentences that this is a DV case and that makes it special. I'm afraid the Director will be too dismissive and not even bother to read the rest of the letter if you don't make it clear why their stale information would not apply to this case.