samird said:It certainly does! What do you think, if the applicant is say, Hassan Rahman and from Turkmenistan, versus Joakim Balievich from Belarus who is going to be approved first? Who is likely to have more detailed background check?
Double_V said:and also I think USICS can track your daily life, remember when you file your I485 you put your SSN on it!! from SSN they can see how much tax did you pay during the past years, if you have a mortgage, financing a new car or even your current job, they can easily see. if you are taking government money, like food stamp, your application will definatly delay! I think it depends on a lot of factors! timing is just one of them!
Double_V said:and also I think USICS can track your daily life, remember when you file your I485 you put your SSN on it!! from SSN they can see how much tax did you pay during the past years, if you have a mortgage, financing a new car or even your current job, they can easily see. if you are taking government money, like food stamp, your application will definatly delay! I think it depends on a lot of factors! timing is just one of them!
14ksusha said:Nonsense! IRS and INS are two different entities and are not intertwined and\or have access to each other's databases. USCIS cannot and is not interested in tracking your food stamps. All they need is your tax returns.
Lazerthegreat said:Well I think this issue is debatable since many people that I know of on this forum personally have gotten approved and they were from "sensitive" Muslim countries and their age was also in Red Flag zone i.e. 22 to 45 years old.
eddie_240 said:I agree, I applied for my work permit in Nov 2004 and received it in Aug 2005.
In Jul 2005 I applied for my I-94 and got a letter today stating that they are doing back ground check and if I don't get my I-94 within 6 months of this letter I should call them.
The problem with the USCIS is that they don't care about immigrants or asylees. My daughter was born last year in the US the day I got the birth certificate I went to the post office to apply for her US passport and guess what I received it with in 2 weeks. So the USCIS cares more of US citizens than us.
thankful said:I do not want to sound like an apologist for the USCIS. However they have a job to perform. Specifically for aliens getting permission to live in the United States is a privilege, not a right. The USCIS has an obligation to verify our backgrounds before extending us a precious benefit, especially in the post 9/11 world.
14ksusha said:Oh, please!!! It takes minutes to run a person's name against terrorists' and FBI wanted lists. It's not like an FBI agent is going to track down your previous places of work and living and question people who knew you. There is no reason checking backround should take 6 months!
annaraka said:You are wrong again. It doesn't take minutes to check fingerprints, there are many forms of checks, like name check, which can take months. I got asked for my divorce decree, although the CIS was never informed of my marriage, which means they do extensive checks of civil registry as well. Furthermore, for some people it takes longer than others, especially if their names pop up in the FBI files for whatever reason, like "persons of interest", or if they had had any criminal history. Plus the FBI is a bureacracy just as any other, and there are priorities in each. So don't jump to conclusions for which you are not informed of the evidence.
annaraka said:You are wrong again. It doesn't take minutes to check fingerprints, there are many forms of checks, like name check, which can take months. I got asked for my divorce decree, although the CIS was never informed of my marriage, which means they do extensive checks of civil registry as well. Furthermore, for some people it takes longer than others, especially if their names pop up in the FBI files for whatever reason, like "persons of interest", or if they had had any criminal history. Plus the FBI is a bureacracy just as any other, and there are priorities in each. So don't jump to conclusions for which you are not informed of the evidence.