Triple Citizen
Registered Users (C)
You are not the only one who thinks like that
The law is clear to me. It's just stupid.
The law is clear to me. It's just stupid.
It is also clearly meaningless because it requires one to carry their green card with them when they are, for example, in the shower. I wonder if such an absurdity would be grounds to challenge it if you did get caught.The law is clear to me. It's just stupid...
No ... if there is an item in your house or car ... gun, drugs, money, documents, etc. and not on somebody else's person, and you are in the house or car at the same time, I think that would be considered the equivalent as being carried in your possession.It is also clearly meaningless because it requires one to carry their green card with them when they are, for example, in the shower. I wonder if such an absurdity would be grounds to challenge it if you did get caught.
Indeed. In Alaska it is illegal to wake a sleeping bear to take a photo of it, not to mention incredibly stupid!No ... if there is an item in your house or car ... gun, drugs, money, documents, etc. and not on somebody else's person, and you are in the house or car at the same time, I think that would be considered the equivalent as being carried in your possession.
But then what about those foreign-born basketball players in the NBA who have a green card ... are they supposed to have the card in their shorts when they're playing? Or people swimming in a community pool or at the beach? Are they supposed to carry the card in their bikini or swim trunks? That's when it gets absurd.
There are other stupid laws that numerous peaceful people break regularly ... in some places it is illegal to bathe on Sunday, or to talk in an elevator, or to wear a jacket and pants that don't match. See http://www.dumblaws.com
But otherwise yes, it would be a bit scary to carry it always worried about loosing it.
If you look at the words in isolation it would appear to mean that, but if you think about the more general context of how they legally treat "carry" and "possession", generally if something is in your house or car while you're in the same house or car, you're considered to be carrying and possessing it unless there is somebody else in the same house or car that you can point to because they have a more direct hold on it.Back to the matter in hand though, I agree with your interpretation of "possession". However, the law that you quoted also states "... shall at all times carry with him ..." which to me clearly indicates the requirement to physically have the card on ones person.
If you look at the words in isolation it would appear to mean that, but if you think about the more general context of how they legally treat "carry" and "possession", generally if something is in your house or car while you're in the same house or car, you're considered to be carrying and possessing it unless there is somebody else in the same house or car that you can point to because they have a more direct hold on it.
Yes, if cops found drugs hidden in your home, you will be charged with "possession" even if they were not found on your body.
California DMV states that "The licensee shall have the valid driver's license issued to him or her in his or her immediate possession at all times when driving a motor vehicle upon a highway."
There seems to be a distinction between simple possession and immediate possession.