Dallas Backlog Elimination Center Tracking
- Thread starter gp111
- Start date
NOF at state level
Hello,
It seems that cases that had NOF (Notice of Finding) at state level are not being approved at the same pace as others. Instead of starting a separate thread for such cases, I suggest that those who had NOF should specify it in their signature. See mine for example.
Hello,
It seems that cases that had NOF (Notice of Finding) at state level are not being approved at the same pace as others. Instead of starting a separate thread for such cases, I suggest that those who had NOF should specify it in their signature. See mine for example.
You folks are right on money! I think that is what the problem is.
Mine is 15th Oct, 2003 Regional ,Ohio, 45 days on 1st March,2005. Can you please post in the tracker
There was a NOF with reposting of my Ad from state and was later cleared from state.
One thing I want to share with you folks which I reposted before too.
Backlog is not following the direction and no one is taking responsible for anythink.
We need to write a letter to Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao, copy one to your local representative and Senator.
When you write this letter put CC to above 3 people's name so that they know that we are informing there above bosses
One of my friend is a right hand man of Mike Dewine who is a senator of Ohio, I spoke to him regarding my situation how bad is Backlog is.
He suggested to write this letter to above 4 people to get this turmoil solved.
As per him if he receives 10-15 letter with similar cased them he forward it to Mike Dewine and he signs it send it to Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine and this people will put pressure on his people about what is going on ?
Now in Backogg there is no control, they are still processing the Regional cased which is just a review only . Imagine for state cases, no hope at all for next few years.
If 100 people join this war to write a letter senator and above 4 people atleast Backlogg elimination centre has to give status of what they are doing?
I will start this process, I will do a certified mail to all 4 people in next 2 days.
Any one have the mailing address for Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine
Good luck.
Biju
Mine is 15th Oct, 2003 Regional ,Ohio, 45 days on 1st March,2005. Can you please post in the tracker
There was a NOF with reposting of my Ad from state and was later cleared from state.
One thing I want to share with you folks which I reposted before too.
Backlog is not following the direction and no one is taking responsible for anythink.
We need to write a letter to Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao, copy one to your local representative and Senator.
When you write this letter put CC to above 3 people's name so that they know that we are informing there above bosses
One of my friend is a right hand man of Mike Dewine who is a senator of Ohio, I spoke to him regarding my situation how bad is Backlog is.
He suggested to write this letter to above 4 people to get this turmoil solved.
As per him if he receives 10-15 letter with similar cased them he forward it to Mike Dewine and he signs it send it to Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine and this people will put pressure on his people about what is going on ?
Now in Backogg there is no control, they are still processing the Regional cased which is just a review only . Imagine for state cases, no hope at all for next few years.
If 100 people join this war to write a letter senator and above 4 people atleast Backlogg elimination centre has to give status of what they are doing?
I will start this process, I will do a certified mail to all 4 people in next 2 days.
Any one have the mailing address for Michael Chertoff and Secretary of Labor Elaine
Good luck.
Biju
Sunofeast_GC,sunofeast_GC said:
Looks like you have delusion regarding BEC approving cases with D-05147-XXXX. It is true that we are seeing some cases getting approved with D-05147 and onwards, but, BEC does not follow Case# but they do take PD in consideration.
For example a case # with D-05147-22222 may have PD Dec 2003 which is not being currently processed but a case with D-05249-22222 having PD=Oct 9 2003 may be in process (or processed already).
Case number gets assigned depending when they were entered in the BEC database. A case with PD=Oct 9 2003 CA may not be having preceding (or) following case number for another case with PD=Oct 9 2003 IL. But both the cases (if there were no RFE's or NOF's) might get processed (assigned to BEC staff for LC adjudication) almost simultaneously.
Last edited by a moderator:
congrats!
Congratulations! GetOneLC!!!! HAppy for you. Good luck for next stages.
Guys,
Looks like prediction made by some member earlier(S_Chicago? or JW?) is observed here. I wouldn't be surprised to see a NOV 03 case getting approval before the end of this week. DBEC must be currently processing mid of NOV03 cases currently. I guess, I am being overwhelmingly quixotic today!
GetOneLC said:
Congratulations! GetOneLC!!!! HAppy for you. Good luck for next stages.
Guys,
Looks like prediction made by some member earlier(S_Chicago? or JW?) is observed here. I wouldn't be surprised to see a NOV 03 case getting approval before the end of this week. DBEC must be currently processing mid of NOV03 cases currently. I guess, I am being overwhelmingly quixotic today!
perter700101
Registered Users (C)
ss_2004 said:
Thank. I filed the AEC from CA.
jonbonjovi
New Member
I am New to this forum
Folks,
I am new to this site. Help me with some useful info. My Labor was filed from Chicago IL in June 2004 under EB2 RIR category. It was transferred to Dallas BackLog center and i have received the 45 day notice sometime in April last week which was answered by my company. Can you let me know how much time do i have to wait to get my LC approved. Any suggestions or help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Folks,
I am new to this site. Help me with some useful info. My Labor was filed from Chicago IL in June 2004 under EB2 RIR category. It was transferred to Dallas BackLog center and i have received the 45 day notice sometime in April last week which was answered by my company. Can you let me know how much time do i have to wait to get my LC approved. Any suggestions or help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
SUPPORT reforms to remove EB VISA Retrogression:
U can send a FAX to ur senators and cong'men from www.isnamerica.org..
Please join that website and send faxes...
House BIll HR 4241 (which alleviates EB Retrogression) will be heard in house some time this week...lets send faxes guys...go on!!!
U can send a FAX to ur senators and cong'men from www.isnamerica.org..
Please join that website and send faxes...
House BIll HR 4241 (which alleviates EB Retrogression) will be heard in house some time this week...lets send faxes guys...go on!!!
WhyThisDelay
Registered Users (C)
dsugandhi.
I confirmed with my lawyer today. My PD is teh PD of the sub labor viz 2001. I am not sure which category I belong to (dont really care about it now), but my best guess is that it was 3rd category.
I confirmed with my lawyer today. My PD is teh PD of the sub labor viz 2001. I am not sure which category I belong to (dont really care about it now), but my best guess is that it was 3rd category.
dsugandhi said:
Screenshot Process status
Hello,
I have received screenshot from Dallas BEC through my attorny today. I am wondering if anyone know what the process status TR means?
Thanks in advance.
My case details:
SWSA: Denver
PD: 10/15/2001
45day letter: haven't received yet.
Hello,
I have received screenshot from Dallas BEC through my attorny today. I am wondering if anyone know what the process status TR means?
Thanks in advance.
My case details:
SWSA: Denver
PD: 10/15/2001
45day letter: haven't received yet.
WhyThisDelay said:
WhyThisDelay and dsugandhi,
Sec. 204.5 Petitions for employment-based immigrants
http://uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/in...mplates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-8cfrsec2045
This is an official USCIS web page
This document says: A priority date is not transferable to another alien.
Please correct me if I do not understand it right
Priority Date
sfmars
My understanding of this clause is that once a priority date is established on an I-140, the PD is for that particular alien beneficiary to keep. If he/she quits that company and moves to another company either using AC21 or without AC21 the PD is his/hers tp keep. If the move is without AC21 a new LC has to be applied for but when filing new 140 if they file a copy of the old 140, then the PD of the old 140 will be the PD of the new 140 irrespective of the date of the new LC application.
The PD is established based on the original LC application because the company declares to DOL that a job vacancy was existing on the date of initial filing of LC and that American employees were not available to fill that job position.
Say a company has two employees A and B for whom 140s are approved. A has PD of 1/1/2000 and B has 2/2/2001. Assume A left the company. The employer cannot request to substitute B's 140 with A's and B cannot claim 1/1/2000 as PD even if the job specs are same. Probably that may be possible if company revokes A's 140 and refiles another 140 petition for B using the LC approved for A as a substituion. (I am not sure if this is allowed by law.)
Hope I have not made this more confusing.
sfmars said:
sfmars
My understanding of this clause is that once a priority date is established on an I-140, the PD is for that particular alien beneficiary to keep. If he/she quits that company and moves to another company either using AC21 or without AC21 the PD is his/hers tp keep. If the move is without AC21 a new LC has to be applied for but when filing new 140 if they file a copy of the old 140, then the PD of the old 140 will be the PD of the new 140 irrespective of the date of the new LC application.
The PD is established based on the original LC application because the company declares to DOL that a job vacancy was existing on the date of initial filing of LC and that American employees were not available to fill that job position.
Say a company has two employees A and B for whom 140s are approved. A has PD of 1/1/2000 and B has 2/2/2001. Assume A left the company. The employer cannot request to substitute B's 140 with A's and B cannot claim 1/1/2000 as PD even if the job specs are same. Probably that may be possible if company revokes A's 140 and refiles another 140 petition for B using the LC approved for A as a substituion. (I am not sure if this is allowed by law.)
Hope I have not made this more confusing.
GCPD0102 said:
GCPD0102 and WhyThisDelay,
Would you feel comfortable to show this document to your attorney and ask his interpretation ?
http://uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/in...mplates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-8cfrsec2045
i am in same boat
hello
i am a new member.
My case is pretty same as UG's case in term of PD and RD.
But, My is missouri.
after i file LC to SWA in 9-24-2003, Missouri SWA had memorandum in 11-3-2003. Therefore, SWA asked amemdment in my application and my lawer did it and my case was moved to Chicago DOL.
I am always thinking about whether it can be problem or not.
Apparently, My lc is not approved.
gth999 said:
hello i am a new member.
My case is pretty same as UG's case in term of PD and RD.
But, My is missouri.
after i file LC to SWA in 9-24-2003, Missouri SWA had memorandum in 11-3-2003. Therefore, SWA asked amemdment in my application and my lawer did it and my case was moved to Chicago DOL.
I am always thinking about whether it can be problem or not.
Apparently, My lc is not approved.
Pravin Patel
Registered Users (C)
LC approved
Dear Friends,
At last, I got approval of my LC by post to me, my employer and my lawyer to day. It was signed on Nov. 07, 2005.
My data as under :
----------------
Priority date : Nov. 07, 2003
Regional Date : May 14, 2004
ETA # : D - 05011-xxxxx
Status : Chicago-RIR - Health proffesion.
Pravin....
Dear Friends,
At last, I got approval of my LC by post to me, my employer and my lawyer to day. It was signed on Nov. 07, 2005.
My data as under :
----------------
Priority date : Nov. 07, 2003
Regional Date : May 14, 2004
ETA # : D - 05011-xxxxx
Status : Chicago-RIR - Health proffesion.
Pravin....