JustWatching
Registered Users (C)
Here are the facts:
In a PERM briefing done by DOL back in January.
Go to this link: http://www.usimmigration.net/images...-05_Chicago.pdf
Look at slide #7. It clearly states "refile is considered a withdrawal"
Yesterday, in the DOL website FAQ II was posted regarding PERM.
It states:
"Only if an employer chooses to withdraw an earlier application and refile the application for the identical job opportunity under the refile provisions of PERM will previously filed application be processed under the PERM regulation"
Now immigration-law.com interpretation is:
"One question which the backlog filers have been anxiously awaiting was the affect of a new PERM filing on the pending cases in the Backlog Processing Centers. Some of them were reluctant to file a new application under the PERM program for fear that their pending applications might be considered automatically withdrawn or denied. However, the release of Q&A II has made clear that unless the PERM filers chose to withdraw by filing of the PERM applications, the pending cases at the Backlog Processing Centers will be processed without being affected by such filing. This policy is thus likely to spur filing of new applications by those whose pre-PERM applications have been pending as these cases may not be affected by the new PERM application regardless of the outcome of the decision of the PERM applications."
My opinion
Is that immigration-law is stretching the truth. What I would now say is the following:
If under PERM, you flag (there is a box in the application) the REFILE box your case will DEFINITELY be withdrawn from the Backlog Center. This is the only way you can attempt to maintain your PD in your PERM application.
What I am now wondering is:
If you file PERM, without stating it is a REFILED case, i.e. your PD is the day you file your PERM case then it seems like it may be possible to keep both your old LC in processing and the new PERM application.
However, I wouldn't agree with immigration-law in saying this is "clear", I think this is still somewhat speculation.
In a PERM briefing done by DOL back in January.
Go to this link: http://www.usimmigration.net/images...-05_Chicago.pdf
Look at slide #7. It clearly states "refile is considered a withdrawal"
Yesterday, in the DOL website FAQ II was posted regarding PERM.
It states:
"Only if an employer chooses to withdraw an earlier application and refile the application for the identical job opportunity under the refile provisions of PERM will previously filed application be processed under the PERM regulation"
Now immigration-law.com interpretation is:
"One question which the backlog filers have been anxiously awaiting was the affect of a new PERM filing on the pending cases in the Backlog Processing Centers. Some of them were reluctant to file a new application under the PERM program for fear that their pending applications might be considered automatically withdrawn or denied. However, the release of Q&A II has made clear that unless the PERM filers chose to withdraw by filing of the PERM applications, the pending cases at the Backlog Processing Centers will be processed without being affected by such filing. This policy is thus likely to spur filing of new applications by those whose pre-PERM applications have been pending as these cases may not be affected by the new PERM application regardless of the outcome of the decision of the PERM applications."
My opinion
Is that immigration-law is stretching the truth. What I would now say is the following:
If under PERM, you flag (there is a box in the application) the REFILE box your case will DEFINITELY be withdrawn from the Backlog Center. This is the only way you can attempt to maintain your PD in your PERM application.
What I am now wondering is:
If you file PERM, without stating it is a REFILED case, i.e. your PD is the day you file your PERM case then it seems like it may be possible to keep both your old LC in processing and the new PERM application.
However, I wouldn't agree with immigration-law in saying this is "clear", I think this is still somewhat speculation.