Lisa_t said:Hi Icarus, do you have information about these CA SWA cases? how did they pick up these cases? what are the Priority Date for these cases? Thank you.
also are these CA SWA cases RIR or non-RIR? thanks again.
Lisa_t said:Hi Icarus, do you have information about these CA SWA cases? how did they pick up these cases? what are the Priority Date for these cases? Thank you.
The cases were being stored at the SF RO and were sent along with the RO backlog cases distributed between DAL and PHI. I seriously doubt if they represent a significant portion of the state backlog. It was like "since y'all are here taking these RO cases, go ahead and take these too". The state cases that were sent, all came to the DAL BEC. There is no rhyme or reason to the cases that were sent other than it looks like they all were CA cases. LO dates on the files range from 4/01 thru 2/04 with a few others outside this range for variety. They didn't have a paradox number since RO hadn't gotten to them yet, so for the time being until they're processed and a 45-day letter sent out, they will be difficult to track. They include both RIR and TR.Lisa_t said:Hi Icarus, do you have information about these CA SWA cases? how did they pick up these cases? what are the Priority Date for these cases? Thank you.
Icarus said:cases received by DAL BEC from SF were in RD range of 5/03 to 9/04; Phil.BEC cases were mostly from period of 7/03 to 7/04. There were a few stragglers outside of these dates. The only way to be sure is to find out what the 45-day letter says when received by employer/attorney. (end of 11/04, hopefully)
Icarus said:The cases were being stored at the SF RO and were sent along with the RO backlog cases distributed between DAL and PHI. I seriously doubt if they represent a significant portion of the state backlog. It was like "since y'all are here taking these RO cases, go ahead and take these too". The state cases that were sent, all came to the DAL BEC. There is no rhyme or reason to the cases that were sent other than it looks like they all were CA cases. LO dates on the files range from 4/01 thru 2/04 with a few others outside this range for variety. They didn't have a paradox number since RO hadn't gotten to them yet, so for the time being until they're processed and a 45-day letter sent out, they will be difficult to track. They include both RIR and TR.
This clearly indicates that the visa numbers are not going to retrogress any time soon. My guess is the BEC's may process about 5-10k apps each in the first batch and that may take 2-3 months from jan and another batch for the next 3-4 months after that.(based on their current speed) We will soon have 2006 quota available from oct 2005. Anybody wants to third guess.gp111 said:Worrysome Vacuum in Labor Certification Processing During Reorganization and Transition
There are already a huge backlog in the permanent labor certification applications. However, information suggests that the labor certification applications at both state level and regional level are caught up in the reorganization process and not moving ahead. This has lasted for a while. One wonders how this has affected the total number of the backlogs which had already exceeded 300,000. People should remember that a large number of the backlog cases involve regular applications that need a "supervised" recruitment process which is a very time-consuming process demanding involvement of huge resources in the newly created backlog reduction centers. Besides, when reorganization brings in new resources with the limited experience and training, the process and adjudication often experience black and white approach and create so-called "training issues." We have yet to see the quality of the performance of the new backlog reduction centers. Depending on the performance of these backlog reduction centers, the goal of backlog reduction may face a serious challenge. We hope to see these backlog centers move ahead very quickly and flexibly so that they are not caught up in another bureaucratic red tapes and floods of NOFs or unreasonable assessment letters or RFEs.
(thanks to www.immigration-law.com)
Speaking of...read today's posts to Phil forum....lc4gc said:Any new information from your site? really expect to see your post...thanks for always giving us some hope..
read info from Philadephia forum, P-BEC will send the letters out on Nov 22 and process the application based on the priority date...wonder if it is true in D-BEC...
by the way, do you know the priority date for Dallas cases? I confused because the state received date in FLCdatacenter database is only two days earlier than regional received date....if that date counts as priority date, it would be horrible....it means all the LC applications lying 5-6 months in TWC would not be disappeared.....do you have any idea?
thanks......
I can only imagine the frustration compounded by so many different storys, theorys and opinions. I do know that delays, real or imagined, are not deliberate-at least at the case processing level. Can't speak for DOL policy or political/bureaucratic point of view.pabman_uk said:I was told today by my sponsor that the BEC was no longer taking calls for specific cases and would only advise by Fax.This was apparently started two weeks ago.
Is this yet another way of stalling? seems to me that we had a better situation before at least things had moved and we could track it.Has anyone any idea what month Dallas is doing , I was told a month ago they were hoping to start Novembers.