I am sorry to get you worried. It is just one of the possibilities. I took another look, and, with the number of people KCC made current through August, it actually looks quite exactly what they need to issue 3500 for Nepal. If any, there will be very very few of potential Nepalese that might be left out by the country limit.
Hi Sensei-san,
Yeah right? It has been quite a debate for us ROAs in other threads.
Thanks Mummy!
From what I've red the more experienced members say as long as it's in transit you're ok. In transit means you have a date scheduled/assigned that has been passed on to your embassy it's just a matter of the embassy being slow in updating the system to say they received your case. As for the 2NL's no one received it yet so as you can guess it's still all normal, you'll know when they start rolling out and if you don't get one then you can start looking into the matter.
ok thank you
You're welcome.
Right, KCC steers Nepal through CN progression limits, as published in the VB. After that folks from Nepal, like ROA and Iran, daw from the DV AS pool - that presumably won't be exhausted until the very end of September. Hence, no higher risk for Current folks from Nepal when it comes to interview/visa issuing process in my book. This train of thought originated from AOS sub forum discussion and was therefore meant for AOS applicants from Nepal with later interview dates, as compared to CP.
Is this in your Talmud? How about the 7% country limit in your book?
No, no Talmud needed for that
Yes. That is in ceac, which AOSs are not. We do not know how many of them out there, anyhow I would want to have an interview earlier rather than later if I were a Nepalese Jew.No, no Talmud needed for that
As you already correctly pointed out, Sensei-san, "with the number of people KCC made current through August, it actually looks quite exactly what they need to issue 3500 for Nepal". This simply suggested what I had said above: "KCC steers Nepal through CN progression limits, as published in the VB", hence you and I seem to be aligned on the matter, as far as I can see...
Sure, an earlier interview date is always better, no discussion here. Yet please remember, the consideration started on the AOS thread and was solely related to the question whether an AOS candidate from Nepal, who became Current for June, could possibly have a distinct disadvantage by having his interview date in July, August or September, i.e. later than would have been the case through CP processing. The preliminary answer to this distinct question was NO, as long as the the DV AS visa "pool" would not be exhausted, which is unlikely to occur before the second half of September in my opinion. Finally, through proper KCC management of published VB numbers for Nepal, which certainly will be cut-off or only show very small increase for September if any, KCC can rather easily ensure that Nepal stays within maximum DV country limits for all Nepalese.
My preliminary answer would be yes, they could possibly. I am not sure why keep bringing up Asian "pool", being unexhausted does not help against the country limit.
Well, simply because KCC will make sure to only release as many Nepalese CN's, through country specific VB numbers, for Nepal to stay within the max DV limit/country. Makes sense?
I picked up some quotes from the blog. Nothing to worry about - just my echolalia kicking in.
I still don't see how it affects the country limit.