Did you ask your lawyer whether you can attend ? My gut says that when one is represented by an attorney, only the attorney should attend.
There was a document on FBI's website that highlighted the difference between FOIPA and name check. Basically it said FOIPA is a search of the electronic index file and name check is a search of index and reference file. Do we know if the reference file is automatically checked or checked only if there's a hit in the index file. This is important because defendants argue that FOIPA is different from name check.
Thanks AGC4ME , He told me he will attend right after he returns from the other state. I am kind of worried , What if he can not make it , for any reason , ( i.e canceled flights , traffic, congestion e.t.c e..t.c ) , is there any reference , law that allows one to represent himself if his lawyer is not present?
Thanks ,and gurus please help with your thought also.
There was a document on FBI's website that highlighted the difference between FOIPA and name check. Basically it said FOIPA is a search of the electronic index file and name check is a search of index and reference file. Do we know if the reference file is automatically checked or checked only if there's a hit in the index file. This is important because defendants argue that FOIPA is different from name check.
Do not worry, they will respond one way or another. You cannot do much in this situation other that wait for defendants move. If it was not government, you could have moved for default judgment.
You can attend the conference and at least warn the judge that your counsel may be late. It will be much better than making judge wait for nothing.
I just received a letter from FBI (forwarded to me) today, in response to an inquiry through congressman 4 months ago on 4/5/07. It comes from the "National Name Check Program Section, Records Management Division", the letter says:
"A review of the FBI's Name Check Program database revealed that your request was received from the USCIS on 6/20/03. This submission was processed and finalized on 5/22/2006. The result was forwarded to USCIS headquarters, Washington, D.C."
A few months ago I was told that my fingerprint check was submitted on 6/20/03 and finalized and result (clear, no record) returned to USCIS the very next day.
What does it mean? That FBI letter didn't say my NC is cleared or not. Anyway it's obviously that USCIS received both my fg and NC result for over a year.
But each time when I checked in the past (by myself or through senator, congressman) I was always told it's still pending security check, include my last inquiry in June 07. How could that be?! What else are being checked?
my timeline:
filed N-400 on 6/5/03
fingerprinted 6/18/03
interviewed on 12/23/03
moved in Oct 06 and filed AR-11 change of address (filed 3 times and finally current address got updated on file)
early June 07, I was told by infopass at local office that my file is still in old CIS office (after I requested 5 times to move to my current local office)
filed 1447b in June 07 - waiting for response
You are welcome.
You can do that, but it is not a required step. 30 days is quite reasonable for that purpose.
lazycis
help me, please...I am drained from daily work. need to work full time. some low paid job. I filed pro se, to save some money, and trouble, but now the case becomes a bit complicated............
what should i do for the next step? I prefer to continue filing pro se, compared to getting an attorney, as long as it is not too complicated...
I googled a bit...and found out this msj might be the ever toughest document i am to write............it seems i can not just copy others anymore...
ausa's filed answer does not have a proposed order with it, their filed application for extension of time did have one. since they have not fined their msj, i guess i can not oppose to their msj then, and can only write my own msj with a proposed order.... i will do more research...thank you so much...