another bill

tombaan

Registered Users (C)
Congress Looks to Grant Legal Status to Immigrants
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

Published: October 13, 2003


ighteen-year-old Yuliana Huicochea moved to the United States at age 4, but now faces deportation because immigration officials stopped her on a school trip to a science fair.

Ms. Huicochea's troubles began last year when she and other members of her high school science team traveled from Phoenix to Buffalo to enter their 15-foot solar-powered boat in the fair and decided to take a side trip to the Canadian side of Niagara Falls. Immigration officials stopped Ms. Huicochea and three teammates and told them they faced deportation because they were illegal immigrants.

"I'm scared," said Ms. Huicochea (WEE-coe-CHAY-uh), now a sophomore at Phoenix College, who declined to say what country she immigrated from. "I don't know any other place. My whole family is here. This is where my education is, my dreams, my goals. I don't know what I would do anywhere else."

Hispanic groups and immigrant advocates have embraced her cause, insisting that it is wrong to expel teenagers who immigrated as toddlers. And now, with many members of Congress thinking about next year's elections and paying increasing attention to the concerns of Hispanics, the issue is gaining bipartisan interest on Capitol Hill.

Orrin G. Hatch, the Utah Republican who is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is sponsoring a bill that would grant legal status to Ms. Huicochea and tens of thousands of other high school students or graduates who are illegal immigrants. His bill — the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (or Dream) Act, has 36 sponsors, one-third of them Republican. His aides say they expect the Judiciary Committee to approve the bill this week.

The bill is part of a wave of immigration legislation that has gathered bipartisan momentum in recent weeks. One bill would grant accelerated citizenship to immigrants who serve in the armed forces. Another would grant legal status to 500,000 farm workers if they commit themselves to doing agricultural work for several more years. That bill's main sponsors in the Senate are Larry Craig, Republican of Idaho, and Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts. They say it has the support of the Senate leadership, conservatives, liberals, agricultural employers, the nation's largest farm workers' union, the Chamber of Commerce and the A.F.L.-C.I.O.

"On the farm workers' bill," said Cecilia Munoz, a vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino advocacy group, "you're talking about an alliance of strange bedfellows who have agreed on a major policy that's in the interests of the industry and the workers."

Sharon Hughes, executive vice president of the National Council of Agricultural Employers, said, "For the first time, we have a large constituency for the reforms."

Several lawmakers say their strategy is to use the farm workers' bill as a wedge to advance other legislation that would grant legal status to other groups of illegal immigrants, like the hundreds of thousands working in restaurants and hotels.

"We think we have an excellent chance of getting the agricultural workers' bill passed," Senator Kennedy said. "I'm drawing up follow-up legislation for other industries. There's been a dramatic shift in the atmosphere on all this."

Republican backers in the House and Senate say the White House has signaled that President Bush will sign the farm workers' bill if it reaches his desk.

Claire Buchan, a White House spokeswoman, said, "We are reviewing this legislation and look forward to working with Congress."

Two years ago a push to grant legal status to millions of illegal immigrants was gaining momentum as President Vicente Fox of Mexico pressed President Bush to give a fairer deal to immigrant laborers. But the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, derailed those efforts, because the Bush administration began concentrating on securing borders rather than helping immigrants.

"We are farther away from the horrors of Sept. 11, and we've had a chance to digest it," said John F. Gay, co-chairman of the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a business group that supports granting legal status to millions of illegal immigrants. "People inside and outside of Congress are beginning to understand that immigration reform makes you more secure."

Under the Craig-Kennedy bill, immigrants who want legal status must show that they did farm work for 100 days over the past 18 months. They will then receive temporary resident status, but if they fail to do 360 days of farm work over the next six years, they will revert to illegal status. The bill would also reduce many bureaucratic barriers that make it hard for farmers to bring in seasonal guest workers from abroad.

"This is not an amnesty program," said Representative Howard L. Berman, a California Democrat who is co-sponsoring the House bill with Christopher P. Cannon, a Utah Republican. "This is an earned legalization program."

Opponents of helping illegal immigrants have vowed to fight the new bills. "It's never time to reward people for breaking the law," said Representative Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican who is one of Congress's most outspoken foes of easing immigration rules. "That's the worst kind of public policy."

Mr. Hatch's legislation would grant legal status to teenagers like Ms. Huicochea who have been in the United States at least five years, have graduated from high school and have no criminal record. The bill would also lift a restriction that discourages state universities from charging the lower in-state tuition rate to illegal immigrants.

"We've gone to high school at taxpayers' expense, and now we can't give back to the community because we face deportation," said Ms. Huicochea, who hopes to become a lawyer. "The Dream Act is not only for our benefit, but for everybody. We would be able to start giving back to the community."
 
reply

A paragraph From Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52647-2004Jan3.html

The Arizonans' bill proposes a new type of visa for workers who are now in the United States illegally. They could come forward and receive this visa for three years. After that, the formerly undocumented worker could apply for a temporary visa like those held by workers under the electronic job registry.
If this happens then guess what BCIS will be doing all day long for the next two years.
 
Yet another Road block !!!

So this means that the 485 processing will go on hold for another 3-4 years ?

Who knows , we can also become illegals by not renewing EADs and APs and get faster green card .:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Re: Yet another Road block !!!

Originally posted by narl
Who knows , we can also become illegals by not renewing EADs and APs and get faster green card .:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Sorry, you don't fall out of status by not renewing EAD/AP. Nice thought, though.
 
Re: Re: Yet another Road block !!!

Originally posted by TheRealCanadian
Sorry, you don't fall out of status by not renewing EAD/AP.
If you are working by virtue of your EAD and if there is an interrugnum in your EAD, then it will certainly cause problems as that will be a genuine out-of-status case.
 
poongunranar, I couldn't agree with you on this.

Working without EAD might be considered as "working illegally in US" other than out-of-status, if I485 was filed.

Just my thought. Discussion is welcome!

FujiS :cool:
 
FujiS

I am not sure if you are in agreeance with me. What I tried to emphasize was that, one should not only work without an EAD, but if working on EAD, must strive to be on EAD all the time without any gaps -- gaps for even a few days -- to maintain AoS.. Hope this is clear. Thanks.
 
Could a gap of few days (about a week) between two EADs could cause a problem for the adjustment of the status? I had applied before 90 days but did not receive the EAD. I could have gone to the local office with the receipt to get an interim EAD, instead i instrucuted HR department to put me on a leave without pay for a week.
Does this situation make me out of status?
 
reply

I guess most people in here concur that it is better to be an illegal than to be a legal. May be we can start a body shop and the advertisement says “For Hire: Experienced professionals willing to bend over back, kiss ass (several years experience on this) to pick fruits, vegetables, drive tractors in the most optimal way inorder to maximize your profits. Pay us less than minimal wages but just sponsor us for the GCs’ and we will work overtime for you without any payment.

We are used to all these anyway.
:D ;)
 
AIS (Adjustment to Illegal Status)

I think you will have to file I-485i for AIS (Adjustment to Illegal Status) and pay $500 as the application fee. While this application is pending (which may take anywhere from 990-999 days) you need keep extending your illegal status by filing form I-XXXi by paying $200 each time. Since these extensions may take anywhere from 60-180 days, you need to apply 6 months before your current extension expires. And some times these extensions are approved in one month and you lose 5 months on your extension. You just need to suck it up and get ready for the next extension. And you can not have any gap in your extensions, other wise you will be considered LEGAL.

Since this entire process is very complicated, attorneys will charge you anywhere from $2000 - $10000, depending on your case...
 
Nooo, you will get the visa for a few mexican pesos and get a green card if you become a member of the republican party... Suggestion for the slogan for the new lawn mowing company:-
Computerized mow, republican chow!
 
Top