Addresses lived in last 5 years

T

thewildleo

Registered Users (C)
Sorry if this was answered previously:
Applying on the 4+1 rule based on reentry permit. Was out of country for >1 year 3.5 years ago for finishing up school.
While listing placed lived in last 5 years do I list my india address or should just list my US address ?
thanks in advance
 
you should include ur indian address for the time you have been outside.

what are the proof you'r going to show u maintained ties , taxes? mortgage? utilities?




fyi, wait out the whole 4 year and 1 day, there is no 90 day head start!
 
You can't use 4 year +1 day rule if you were out > 1 year 3.5 years ago. You'll only be able to use 4 years +1 day rule after you returned from that long trip. For example, if you returned in August 2007 after long trip > 1 year, then you can only apply 4 years + 1 day after your return in 2007.

You'll need to provide India address if you didn't maintain a US primary abode at the time.
 
thanks bobsmyth
Sorry I was out >1 yr >4 yrs ago (back into the US in 11/06)
Re. maintaining primary US abode back then i lived with my uncle so did not have mortgage or a lease. I did file taxes.
Should I just but down my india address to be safer? The only concern I have is will I then need police verification from India?
Thanks for your help guys
 
In that case put your India address. Make sure to mention on N-400 that you are applying under 4 year + 1 day rule (8 CFR 316.5 (c)(1)(ii) ).
Police reports are only required if your FP are rejected twice due to poor quality.
 
solid_traveling said:
you should include ur indian address for the time you have been outside.

what are the proof you'r going to show u maintained ties , taxes? mortgage? utilities?

fyi, wait out the whole 4 year and 1 day, there is no 90 day head start!
Click to expand...

solid_traveling,

One only has to "show ties" when trying to overcome the "rebuttable presumption of a break" between 6 months but less than a year under 8 CFR 316.5(c)(1)(i)(A-D).

For a "confirmed or admitted break" whether a shorter one or over 1 year, they just wait it out as described in 8 CFR 316.5(c)(1)(ii). There two classes of breaks, one can be fought and possibly overcome, the other cannot (UNLESS qualified under a different section of the INA that does not apply here) when there is a break, there is only one affirmative remedy that is the same for either break.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top