whatheheck said:Hello foret1, my friend. how are you?.
If i were you i would just sit tight for the next 4 months. You may hear good news soon. I hope your priority date becomes current soon. Just imagine my situation. My I-140 approved. I guess i need to wait for another 1 year atleast before applying I-485. My PD is Feb'2002-EB3 India. Its really frustrating. I don't know if the dates will move fast beyond May 2001. Dates are at stand still for other contries.
foret1 said:kodak57, GCVARUMA and A0001 thank you all VERY much for your replies and clarifications!!!
unfortunately it seems that may not be able to do it. unitednations explained that although i can file a 2nd lc with eb2 (as i now have 2 masters) and higher position/salary, the lc may not be approved as i obtained the 2 masters when working for my current company. here is what unitednations explained:
"on the perm labor it asks when you acheived the highest level of education related to the position. Therefore, they will know that you received the masters while you were working with the company and probably will not consider you having met the requirements of the job because you gained it with the employer.
You would fall into the category that the experience you gained has to be 50% different then what the position requires to get the labor approved."
i do not understand what exactly this requirement is and what the 50% is about. does any know what this means? anyone knows the details about this experience rule or where i could read about it?
this really sucks because my boss is willing to do it and pay for it...yet, once again my luck comes short (so close and still so far)
thanks again all!!!
kodak57 said:Example for you:
Current position with current employer:
Software Engineer:
40% Design
40% Development
20% Testing
Future Position with current employer:
IT Manager:
40% Communicate with client
35% Manage team members
25% Design, development and testing
As you can see, future position in this case is more than 50% different than current position. This has to be described in the promotional offer letter from the employer. The letter is needed only if DOL audits the case.
***This is only my opinion. Please seek legal counsel before taking any steps***
foret1 said:thanks for the quick response kodak57!
the new position (that i am actully/currently doing) is more than 50% different than the old position that was mentioned in my lc back in 2001. but i don't think the issue is about the position being different though.
what got me worried is that as unitednations explained, the experience gained has to be 50% different than what the position requires. so the issue seems to be about the experience itself and 2 masters as i gained them with the current employer.
thoughts anyone?
foret1 said:thanks for the quick response kodak57!
the new position (that i am actully/currently doing) is more than 50% different than the old position that was mentioned in my lc back in 2001. but i don't think the issue is about the position being different though.
what got me worried is that as unitednations explained, the experience gained has to be 50% different than what the position requires. so the issue seems to be about the experience itself and 2 masters as i gained them with the current employer.
thoughts anyone?
spidey said:tuareq
I am on EAD, my H1-b expired in Feb this year (6 yrs complete) -
I dont feel there are any disadvantages, in fact if you plan to use AC21 you have the advantage of negotiating like a GC holder.
However many lawyers and therefore most GC aspirants will swear by the advantages of having a backup status in case your I-485 is denied. This maybe a false sense of security, as any H1-B extensions based on pending I-485 become invalid when a I485 is denied. Also, if I understand correctly there is no appeals process for a denied 485.
If you dont have an approved 140 though you dont have the availability of AC21 therefore you should try to maintain H1 status. 140 denial can be based on your employers ability to pay or others.
This is all my opinion. Nothing more nothing less.
sappana said:Spidey,
You mentioned that the 3 yr H1B extension that you get after I140 approval becomes invalid if at all I485 gets denied. Do you have any articles/publications which proves that theory. I have read several postings in this forum which say that H1b and 485 are two different things. Once you get your H1B extension then it is valid till it expires.
I would appreciate if anyone can share their experiences in this matter.
Thanks,
- sappana
EB3 : PD:03/2001
I-140 : RD:05/26/05, ND:06/02/05, RFE 12/9/05, AD 03/08/2006
I-485: RD 05/26/05, ND:06/02/05
Vasu209 said:Congrats JaiSIngh.
What are Ur PD RD NDates.
spidey said:From www.immigration-law.com
Ok, so it's not exactly what I suggested, but whats in bold below suggests to me that AC21 H1-B extension benefits are only legit until that time that the underlying application is valid.
**************************************
jaisingh said:My 485 is approved ....priority date was June 2000.... Thanks for everyone who shared information with me ......
Special thanks to users .... Sahithi and United nations.
Once again thanks to everyone