Search results

Got plastic card Heard on June 19th that my card was ordered. Received card on July 1st. Looks like card was mailed on June 26th. My details WAC - 01-262 Approved - March 11th PD Nov. 1997 Hang in there those guys who have not received their approval yet.

I figure people could post their experiences in this thread rather than start a fresh discussion for every PP stamping experience. Here is my experience. I was debating between going to SFO ( even though my notice said SJ ). In the end decided to go to SJ at 8:30am, and if I didn\'t get...

yes you can I just went today and got my passport stamped.

Practise Zen Hi Guys, Unfortunately people here try to attribute logic and decency to the INS and CSC folks. Over the last 4.5 years I have come to the conclusion that anytime you do this, you will just build up your expectations and wind up getting disappointed and then depressed...

congrats Wow! Congrats. I resolved not to check AVM till you got approval ( since our dates are so similar ). Just camped on the phone after reading your message and got through to an IIO. Was very nice, but said that my case had not been assiassigned :-(

murthy on correcting POE I 94 mistakes Hi Kiwi, I read about correcting mistakes on I 94 just yesterday on murthy.com http://www.murthy.com/UDpoeip.html See if any of those things might apply to your case. Best of Luck.

reviewed vs. assigned I got through to an IIO yesterday too. She said my case is being reviewed. However when I specifically asked if that meant that it had been assigned to an officer she didn\'t give me a clear answer. Also didn\'t give any answer to how long it would take from that...

no 72 phoenix_gc Approved on Feb-11 RD 5/11 WAC-01-233-XXXXX Posted By: phoenix_gc 2/13/02 5:56 PM (#9 of 9) AS Per AVM, I-485 is approved for me and my spouse. Our Details: RD: 5/11 ND: 7/13 WAC #: WAC-01-233-XXXXX Location: Phoenix FP Scheduled: 11/02 FP Done : 10/10/02 Last AVM...

Column for resumed processing If one sorts the data by remarks, one can see that the approvals are clustered around the AVM processing resumed message. Could you add a column for when the AVM message changed to processing resumed ? Thanks again for all you hard work.

PP stamping in San Francisco So are they still turning back San Jose people from getting their passport stamped in San Francisco ? Or are they allowing the people to get their passport stamped ?

Processing resumed 1/17 On 1/15 AVM changed to FP received and are being reviewed and then to processing resumed on 1/17. BTW my priority date is missing on PCees tracker its 11/97. INS forgot to mail my I-140 approval and would not answer queries on I-140 status because my priority...

FP sched date Oh and I forgot to mention that it was scheduled for 1/25/2002

FP done Notice date on FP notice is Dec 24th Postmark is Dec 26th Received Dec. 29th FP done in San Jose today - Jan 02, 2002 Just for completeness I am including some info missing from the summary My received date - June 18th My Wac is 01-262 My AP was approved August 29th EB3

ead rcvd Received it on the 23rd.

EAD approved San Jose MD : 6/15/2001 ND : 8/20/2001 EAD approval date is 11/11. AVM updated on 11/19 Waiting for FP notice.

gotcher opinion change Everyone quotes the document from imminfo.com. However its dated from 1999 ( before AC21 ). Ron Gotcher\'s recent postings say that he does not believe INS can challenge anybody who changes job after 180 days of filing 485. Having said that. I don\'t want to be...

Approved: randomness, RD 6/18, ND 8/20, PD 11/97, wac 01-262, AD 3/11, eb-3, india Here is my info randomness PD: 11/97, EB 3 - RIR MD: 06/15 RD: 06/18 ND: 08/20 WAC: 01-262 AP: 08/29 EAD: 11/11 FP: 01/02 San Jose AVM msg 01/17 resumed Heard today (3/12) at 6pm...

Case Assigned Looks like I still have to wait a few more weeks. I was told last Friday and again today that my case was assigned. This time I remembered to ask when it was assigned, the IIO said Feb 25th. BTW I asked all the questions - is it adjudication ready, have you received...

AVM column Hi PCee, I do use the sort by remarks feature. My reason for suggesting a separate AVM resumed processing column are 1. This takes up less real estate on the screen 2. It frees up the remarks column for noting oddities (age out, RFE etc ).