Search results

pv176, So you mean that it is 180 days INCLUDING week - ends and holidays and not 180 "working" days. I guess I got confused myself ..sorry for the same. I will rephrase my question ... Thanx, Maxx.

180 days ...Business days or total days ??? Folks, There was a post in another forum about the meaning of 180 days. Are these business ( working ) days or total days since the 485 application ???? 180 business or "working" days are approx. equal to 30 weeks instead of 24 weeks or 6...

Applied :- Sep. 2003 I-485/EAD/AP Applied :- Nov. 2003 I-140 RFE :- Feb 2004 ( Ability to pay ) RFE Replied :- 5/4/2004 RFE Recvd :- 5/6/2004 Approved :- 5/28/2004 485-EAD-AP Still pending. The interesting point about this case is the company is a tiny co...

http://www.murthy.com/news/n_newpro.html What do U guys think ? I posted a similar article before and there was no response .. I wonder why considering the fact that this might be a major hindrance in the overall processing ... Maxx.

Folks, Here's the link ... http://www.murthy.com/news/n_newpro.html I think this one's a biggy with far reaching effects on concurrent filers ....I did go thru. the whole article and here's what I gathered from the content :- 1> I-140 will be adjucated ONLY after the finger...

Hey Rhinohere, I sent you an e-mail two days back. I am not sure whether you got it ... it had to do with my friend's I-140 RFE .... Maxx.

rhinohere, That's encouraging ...this means that when replying to I-140 RFE ..the company should show good financial record ..which means more than sufficient funds to pay the salary ...along with a letter stating that they can easily pay the salary mentioned in the labor in the immediate...

manoj2003, As far as I understand the way things work, labor is needed to prove that the co. is unable to find a worker with X salary having Y skill set who is either a citizen or a permanent resident ... I-140 is the proof the the ability of the co. to pay the salary mentioned ...now if...

Just following up on my original post ....I got a simple question ....if the Salary mentioned is I-140 ( 48 k ) is LESS than that mentioned in the labor ( 56 k) ..then even if the company can prove that they have enough money to pay the employee ....does this gurantee a denial based on the...

One of my friends recently told me that VSC is denying a LOT of I-140's ...query for I-140 has become commonplace and even a small problem with the case could lead to denial. One of the reasons is applicants show a higher salary in the labor than in I-140 and VSC can deny based on that...

12/26/2001 approved I posted this info in another posting ...this is for the benefit of those subscribing to this thread ... RD :- 12/26/2001 ND :- 1/11/2002 FP :- 5/4/2002 RFE :- 6/5/2003 ( Emp Lett, 3 yrs. W2's, Last 6 pay stubs ) RFE Recvd :- 6/30/2003 AD :- 7/11/2003...

Congratulations ...enjoy Ur. freedom. Maxx.

kmrao, This one a slightly difficult question to answer ...the reason why they ask for past W2's is this is a good way of confirming whether the person has been working or not ..and the reason they want know this is that they want to give GC;s to people who they think are going to do good...

dimarisha, I didn;t check with my co. so i don;t know ...but even if they call .. I don;t see why any co. would not tell the truth if the person is currently employes with them ... Maxx.

I read the various posts. One thing GC holders HAVE to understand ....there is NO getting away from spending a min. amount of time here ( there are ways of getting around this like getting posted in India thur. a US based co. ..but getting jobs like these is tough ) ..... Best solution ...

Folks, I checked today morning ...my case has been approved. Here are the details :- EAC020835xxxx EB3/NY/IND RD :- 12/26/2001 FP :- 5/4/2002 RFE :- 06/05/2003 ( Emp. Letter, Past 3 yrs W2's, Last 6 pay stubs) RFE Received :- 6/30/2003. Approved :- 7/11/2003. Best...

RFE issued on June 5th. for :- 1> Emp. letter 2> Past 3 yrs. W2's 3> Last 6 pay stubs. Documents sent :- 23 rd. June Recieved by BCIS :- 30 th. June Still waiting for AP.

TheRealCanadian, I was waiting for your response as I was sure that it was going to be the most reasonable one. To be honest with you ...the new regulation sounds absurd ......this indirectly translates to this .. No matter how long one has been on beach ....no matter what one is doing...

So one will be approved no matter what the person is doing ...not employed ....was on beach for a huge time ....all this will not matter. Once the I-140 is approved and after that even if the person was on beach for say 6 months from the time I-485 was filed ...no problems ....there is some...

All, There are VARIOUS posts about this new rule ... I can;t believe people are falling for this crap ..... How in the world will BCIS let go of two major things :- 1> Confirmation of the fact that one is employed with the sponsoring employer ( in most cases an RFE is issued ). 2>...