Search results

How about this argument: you can claim that you had the intention to work for the employer when you filed GC, 4-5 years ago. At the time of filing, UCIS estimated time for approval was 600-700 days. You probably stayed with employer 1000+ days with the intention of working for sponoring...

* Update drivers license: Some states print Temporary Immigrant Status in red as if we were carrying some plague.

I would say that working for 6 months or 12 after approval is total BS when the senate is debating if they should offer a path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants who entered and worked here without paying taxes.

My friend spend paid $1600 last week for his and his wife's medicals!

Last action: response to RFE (employment) 8/2006 No LUDs or inquiries since. Lost $175 for unapproved AP, $10 on two photos , $5 on postage in April. Over $10000 spend between self and employers for USCIS and attorney fees for: 3EADs, 2APs, 2LCs, 9H1Bs:eek: Much relieved that I won't be...

Congratulations to you, it proves that NSC is neither following PD nor RD for approvals. When did you respond to RFE?

Short answer is: you have to stay at least 6 months in US to prove that you intent to be a permanent resident.

"processing" is a vauge term at NSC and should be treated as such. They are still "processing" applications from as early as 2002.

Techicallly you do not have to be employed after you file AOS, you only need confirmed offer for ''future job" to get your GC.

Gross injustice continues... I know three people with earlier PD *and* RD who are still waiting for approval at NSC.

It seems about 80-90% cases from 02 and 01 are approved, the rest probably are name check pending cases, guessestimate is about 1000+ eligible cases has to approved before they start 03. One shouldn't be too surprised if the numbers become again unavailable by late fall. Biggest concern for...

Why processing cant be done based on PD PD for India: EB2:01 APR 04 EB3:01 JUN 03 Since EB2 has a 10 month lead over EB2, there could be many EB2 cases with current PD that can't be approved before all EB3s are done, we know this not true because USCIS does not publish separate dates for...

Current PD is required for approval, but the order in which applications are pulled from queue is based on RD. This was the case pre-Dec 2004 retrogression. You can go back to the posts on this forum from that period for confirmation. GCDumbo, there are several people including myself who...

IIRC, filers at NSC having early/mid-2003 RD with non-substituted PD are the first ones to get hit by retrogression. 80%+ cases with earlier RD should be approved, the rest are probably still stuck in name check. Expect lot of cases unapproved cases from later half of 2003 getting approved for...

I dont think AP is required anytime during the departure, you just need a aprroval date prior to the date of departure.

Make sure they don't charge the credit card twice:)

Sad to hear the news.

You are correct, PD it only a ON/OFF flag, the position in queue is determined by RD of 485. Before PD retrogressed in 04, AOS were approved based on RD.

For medical emergencies go to local center, you can have the hospital send a fax stating the fact.

These are nothing but proposals, none of which might become law before next president takes office