Search results

Yeah, probably a 50/50 chance...

Note a couple more points. CUBAN selectees reportedly had no selectees. UK selectees 1303. Both of this are corrected because of my lawsuit, and this was clearly why they delayed the announcement of the dv2026 results. The 1303 selectee number is ridiculous, and is around 4 times what it...

Here is the explanation of the queue ordering.

It doesn't tell us anything of importance. In order to get scheduled at case must be current and its ds260 must be processed. So, if every low number case was slow to be processed, then a high case number would be scheduled before all of those cases. That is how the queue process works.

Yeah, it's a bit odd, but not sure if you want to argue it...

Yeah - I'll call BS on that.

Not a surprise - and I would expect even more flexibility. They just changed the process without notice - it would be odd to enforce the new rule hard and fast.

Why are you guys rescheduling? If you have missing documents you can follow up after the interview.

As expected, the government have announced that UK entries can now check their results, although we know they have messed up the draw. Also they have announced that Cuban DV2026 winners are being contacted to inform them that they are NOT eligible to pursue their selection...

Just an FYI - there are now UK winners for DV2026 as a result of the lawsuit. However, in typical style the government have managed to screw up the simplest job and have created UK winners up to CRAZY high case numbers (highest so far almost 190K). Whilst DV2026 will be a roller coaster due to...

Just an FYI - there are now UK winners for DV2026 as a result of the lawsuit. However, in typical style the government have managed to screw up the simplest job and have created UK winners up to CRAZY high case numbers (highest so far almost 190K). Whilst DV2026 will be a roller coaster due to...

Complete what? An "expedite background check" may be as simple as checking with someone to essentially make a decision (perhaps risk based) to "ignore" whatever checks are being done. Look at the 4 UK cases. I'm guessing none of them actually had background checks done before each of them were...

Me too...

Maybe - but it is still early in the year and we don't have CEAC data, so no point in speculating and worrying.

I see a couple of problems with their plan. 1. They haven't given themselves enough time to implement the rule for DV2027, unless they delay the entry period. 2. It could be hard to implement a payment system that works everywhere in the world. It will be interesting to see what they do....

Mom would be the expert on the how, but perhaps a lawyer could help.

1. Yes - it is an obviously incorrect decision. 2. Yes 3. The argument is simple, you married after the entry. The more important question is how to fight that - remembering you have very little time.

Awesome news!!! You may have seen the two other UK AOS cases were just approved without interviews - so yes they seem to have been nudged along. Several Consular Processing cases have also been issued already - so all these UK cases went from "selected to issued" in a month - not the normal...

Another piece of awesome news this morning!!! I'm thrilled for you!

Wow - that's nice!!!