How would my husband's status affect my case

L

lakshmi_H

Registered Users (C)
Hi all

I am about to file my N400 application in 2 weeks and I have a few concerns.

one of them is that my husband got deported 5 months ago after his immigration case was denied by all immigration courts.

I'd like to know how if anyone has had such an experience and how much it affects the n400 case.

I already filed his I-130 app and its pending currently.

I also like to know what to put under part8 E3 other______.
I am applying under 5 year residency.

My husband's and my criminal history is completely clean not even a traffic ticket.

Any information would be appreaciated.

thanks
 
Since you are filing on your own merit your husband's deportation has no effect on your N-400 application. Since your husband now lives outside US you should put "Resides in (country)" or you can put "Not resident in the US"
 
thanks so much for sharing your knowledge with me on this.

As far as filling out part8 E3 other______. I am kind of confused is there a specific set of selections or can it be anything? like not in the country, NA etc?
 
lakshmi_H said:
thanks so much for sharing your knowledge with me on this.

As far as filling out part8 E3 other______. I am kind of confused is there a specific set of selections or can it be anything? like not in the country, NA etc?
Click to expand...

Resident of India would be fine.
 
I am aware of the ban but at this point I am only concerned about my case and how it will be affected from my husbands state and his ban.

I also need to know what is the right status to enter on part8 E3 other______.

My husband is in india now but is it officially ok to enter that in that field?
 
ok so you guys are saying that its officially ok to put either resiedent of India or nonresident alien.

I just wanted to make sure I enter the correct official option cause I read one of the old posts saying to put exclusion/deportation.
I am kind of concerned to put that cause I am not sure how it will affect my case.

If thats what I must enter then I really dont care cause transparence and truth is more important to me,.

thanks Again
 
You have to put what his current status is, which in your case is "Resident abroad" or "resident in India" or " Not resident in US". There is no need to tell them how he got there (deported, etc.). Only when the specific question comes up in the interview should you answer it.
 
Hernandez I think you dont live in this world.

you know if you'e out of status ICE will show up at your door step and pick you up.

My husband had no criminal record at all.

Again in this thread I didnt want to discuss why my husband got deported but I just wanted to know if it will affect my case and what should I put under his immigration status, thats all.

thanks again
 
Hernandez said:
why your husband was deported if no criminal issue
Click to expand...

the person can be deported for non-criminal issues like:
1) out of the status (overstayed visa)
2) illegal status (sneaking across the border)
3) lying under the oath during the interview or lying on the form-- US citizen or green card could be stripped off.
 
absrao said:
I know this is bit off topic from the thread, but how can someone prove that they didnt lie at the interview if the interview is not video/audio taped ?
Click to expand...
They do videotape some interviews.
Specific example (extreme), if certain citations arent mentioned on the N400 form but disclosed at the interview and are not noted down by IO, how can someone prove that he/she disclosed them ?
Click to expand...
If not video or audiotaped, and you didn't write them on the form, you will have trouble with proving that you disclosed them. So if you are concerned about that, you should list them on the N-400. Without videotape or audio recordings, they will have to rely on what is on the paperwork if they're going to charge you with lying about something, and you'll have to rely on the paperwork to show that you didn't lie.
 
They do videotape some of the interviews. I was at an immigration law office few months ago for a consultation and came across a framed letter on the wall. One of their clients an Indian lady was called "dictator" multiple times by the IO during the interview. I am not sure under what context was it said by the IO. Irrespective of that the lady filed a complaint through the law firm on the IO. The field office director here in Dallas reviewed the complaint, looked at the videotape and indeed confirmed that the IO had uttered the word multiple times. The FO director appologized to the applicant and said that USCIS condems such insults and promised more appropriate trainings for their IO's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top