xerostomic
Registered Users (C)
Since CSPA is not retroactively enacted, don't you think that retention of old PD is very much unjust to those whose parents got GC just before the law was enacted because ppl coming late in que will retain old PD while those standing earlier in que will be given late PD. This is totally unjust because ppl who were first left because of age out after waiting for decades would be further thrown behind in que due to retention of old PD's by new cases.
It might be the reason for consuming FB2b visa numbers. Secondly should we expect less number of cases in FB2b or FB1 once cutt of dates pass August 2002 (when the law was enacted), assuming some of the age out children after August 2002 might have already migrated
I don't see any immigration pundit speaking on issues like this.
It might be the reason for consuming FB2b visa numbers. Secondly should we expect less number of cases in FB2b or FB1 once cutt of dates pass August 2002 (when the law was enacted), assuming some of the age out children after August 2002 might have already migrated
I don't see any immigration pundit speaking on issues like this.