I wrote to the Embass. This is their answer.
So nothing new
.
Hi,
From my perspective that looks like a standard copy & paste answer from the Embassy I’m afraid. Although I do not know the contents of the question they received, their answer seems rather vague and unhelpful when one considers that should this issue
not get resolved at the interview, the applicant will be denied a DV immigrant visa, and thereby entailing the dire aforementioned repercussions which will follow from that as a consequence.
But I have an idea. I just found information that I can easily remove the second name and replace the old documents(passport, ID ) to the new without middle name. The only information about my middle name will be in the birth Certificate with notice of removal. In this case, information from the passport will be the same as in on line DV form. So maybe this is the best way.
Thank you all for information and advice.
While this looks like an easy solution at first instance, I urge you to reconsider these action(s). Attempting a retrospective alteration of your identity documentation will inadvertently appear to anyone inspecting that you have something to hide. It may make the situation infinitely worse.
In my opinion these things will not solve your issue.
The birth certificate has to be the original. From what I understand it is the most important document that pertains to the applicant that is submitted to the Consulate/Embassy. This is because by the time the applicant is eligible to enter their application, they could have any number of changes to their name. The birth certificate is an unequivocal legal article establishing the petitioner’s original given name (and thus legal identity) as it was evidenced at that time. It is not so much just a document listing a name; it is also an instrument of historical record.
Altering your birth certificate is the worst thing you could ever do. In most countries after 12 months from birth nothing can be changed on this document. I do not know what country your birth certificate was issued from, but in most countries an
evidenced name change has to be made either through application to a court, a statutory declaration, or by “deed poll”.
What you must realise is that all of these events will nonetheless be post-dated. Should you decide to start this name change process now, any resulting change will still be recorded to occur on a date sometime in March/April 2012: significantly after the Electronic Diversity Visa application that you presumably made back in October / November 2011, at best useless, at worst extremely detrimental to your credibility, especially since you have stated you've never had a U.S. visa before.
Pretend you are the CO interviewing, and an someone turned up in the same situation.
Would you believe an applicant forgot their own middle name?
Would you believe they were rushed/filled the form "straight from the head" and didn't pay attention to the the details, despite a thirty (30) day window to inspect a simple two (2) page form consisting of basic biographic data and a picture?
Would you not question a name change that occurred after the original entry?
Would you not question why a different name appears on the DS-230?
Etc
The problem is the DV Lottery relies very much on honesty; and a large (some would say disproportionate amount) of people attempt to abuse it at the expense of honest applicants, which leaves precious little tolerance of errors, especially basic errors on fundamental information, such as names.
I think you can see where I’m going with this. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, or pessimistic, but I think you need to invent a time machine.
You must make your mind up to either “gamble” (as verdite schoolboy and others have suggested is an option) by entering a different name on your Form DS-230 which will be submitted to the KCC, go to the interview and try explain the name discrepancy away, or alternatively not risk getting a permanent denial and simply re-apply next year with the proper full name.
Once again, good luck.