Phenomonal movement for EB3 India - 9 days...WOW. At this rate my priority date would be current in 6 years....Looking forward for it .
That tells me that USCIS has all the information in their systems. Its just a matter of what they want to share with the public.
They say that additional retrogressions cannot be ruled out for EB2 (INDIA and CHINA).
1. Why can't the previously lapsed number be recaptured at the discretion of DHS? Why does it have to go through the congress?
2. Why is EB category limited by country of charge-ability?
Why isn't # of visas with dual intent aligned to # of immigrant visas available?
Overlooking reforms for legal immigrants only shows political shortsightedness!
Phenomonal movement for EB3 India - 9 days...WOW. At this rate my priority date would be current in 6 years....Looking forward for it .
DHS simply cannot make up the rules as they go along. If the law does not permit them to reallocate unused visa numbers, they cannot do so.
Because that's how the law is written. Personally, I wouldn't want to see 99% of all EB visas given to Indians and Chinese simply because there are so many more of them, but that's admittedly based on my own country of birth. With that in mind, I don't consider it unreasonable for Congress to allow diversity in applicants for numerically limited categories.
Because the qualifications for said visas are different, and not all H/L visa holders become immigrants.
To be utterly blunt, an alien who never immigrates never naturalizes, and then never votes against you.
Because that's how the law is written. Personally, I wouldn't want to see 99% of all EB visas given to Indians and Chinese simply because there are so many more of them, but that's admittedly based on my own country of birth. With that in mind, I don't consider it unreasonable for Congress to allow diversity in applicants for numerically limited categories.
Because that's how the law is written. Personally, I wouldn't want to see 99% of all EB visas given to Indians and Chinese simply because there are so many more of them, but that's admittedly based on my own country of birth. With that in mind, I don't consider it unreasonable for Congress to allow diversity in applicants for numerically limited categories.
If they want it to be a smooth transition for every body, they should apply the same country limitations for the dual intent work visas.
For a variety of reasons (not all of them legitimate) the H-1B is seen as the visa of underpaid Indian computer professionals and little more.
Ensuring diversity in country of birth and profession would probably be a good idea, but the pessimist in me suggests that no one really wants the H-1B system to be fixed.
... For a variety of reasons (not all of them legitimate) the H-1B is seen as the visa of underpaid Indian computer professionals and little more...