hi ericS and other experts
I am sure you are following my case, and you been replying actively to my queries.
I have few questions again
my case
3 year bachelors of commerce degree + 1 year pgdca. EB3 I140 got denied without RFE on 3 counts
1) A2P
2) education
3) experience letters not in format. (sent them as per the format provided by the attorney along with the brief now)
. Filed an appeal on 23rd march and sent he brief on 21st of this month.
yesterday spoke to my attorney and he told me about this case
http://www.durrani.com/newsite/news_items/nactive_disp.asp?ID=2420
"In an unpublished decision dated June 14, 2007, the AAO reversed an I-140 denied by the Nebraska Service Center where the labor certification required 4 years of college, a bachelor’s degree in business or related field, “U.S. or foreign equivalent,” and 5 years of experience. The beneficiary had four years of college level education in Canada from three different schools, culminating in a Diploma of Technology. Despite inconsistent credential evaluations in the file, the AAO reversed the NSC decision and approved the case in the skilled worker category, finding that the phrase, “U.S. or foreign equivalent,” taken together with the recruitment posting and advertisements all containing the wording “Bachelor’s Degree in Business or related field or equivalent,” and not foreign equivalent degree, was sufficient to define an alternative requirement to a single source bachelor’s degree. A redacted copy of the AAO decision is provided here. Attorneys should note that the best practice is to include a specific definition of what is meant by “or equivalent” on the labor certification as advised by the NSC Liaison Committee in prior postings. This may not be possible for old cases that are now being certified by DOL; in this situation, the new AAO decision may be useful if (1) the labor certification specifies “bachelor’s or equivalent,” (2) does not define what is meant by “or equivalent,” AND (3) there is documentation that the recruitment that was done for the labor certification included the “or equivalent” wording. While unpublished AAO decisions are not binding and this set of facts may not be common, it may still be worthwhile for attorneys to note that this decision may be persuasive for cases that fit this particular fact pattern."
I guess my attorney pointed out this to USCIS yesterday or day before as soon as he read this. I just wanted to know do you see any chances that they will NSC would reopen the case themselves without AAO. And any chances of approval. appreciate your expert opinion.
thanks
Sid