top iranian official has a green card!!

thankful

Registered Users (C)
ATHENS -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice expressed concern today about the case of a high-ranking Iranian official who arrived last month in the United States on a green card and said the Bush administration "will take proper action" once it has established the facts of the case.
Mohammad Nahavandian, an economics and technology aide to Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, has been a legal permanent resident of the United States since 1993 and did not give up that status when he joined the Iranian government last year.
"We were very concerned when we heard about it. We are going to try to make sure that we understand the facts and the legal basis, and then we'll take proper action," Miss Rice told reporters on her plane en route to Athens.
"We have to be true to both the promise of what it means to have a green-card status and the policy considerations of this rather anomalous position, in which you have someone with [whom] the United States does not actually have diplomatic relations, that is a diplomat, a very high-ranking diplomat, in fact inside the United States," she said.
Mr. Nahavandian arrived from Canada on March 25 on a flight from Ottawa to Philadelphia, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official said.
He tried to leave the United States on April 11 and drove to the Canadian border at Niagara Falls but was turned back because he was carrying "prescription medication" that the Canadian authorities "did not consider admissible," the DHS official said.
That same day, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that Tehran had successfully enriched enough uranium to produce nuclear fuel. It was not clear whether Mr. Nahavandian's attempt to depart had anything to do with that announcement.
He was readmitted into the United States because his green card was legal and he raised no suspicion, the DHS official said. He did not have to show his Iranian passport when entering from Canada, and in both cases, the immigration officers had no indication that he was a foreign government official.
Immigrations records show Mr. Nahavandian first arrived in the United States in 1989, when he came on a tourist visa, the DHS official said. He was issued a student visa in 1991 to attend George Washington University and became a permanent resident two years later. His green card was renewed in early 2004.
The administration is looking into Mr. Nahavandian's recent arrival and departure records to establish whether he has abided by the rule that permanent residents must not be out of the country for more than 180 days in order to maintain their status.
However, even if he has fulfilled that requirement, he still can lose his green card because of his employment with the Iranian government, which Washington has blacklisted as a state sponsor of terrorism, administration officials said.
"It's going to take a little time to sort it out," Miss Rice said yesterday. "This is not something that anybody foresaw."
 
i bet they are dying of embarrasment now........
the big bad iranian government, one of their own........
 
What is so surprising about this? Lots of Iranian Americans in the U.S. I read somewhere that after Latinos & Indians. Iranians are the next minority..

Lets see how bush handles this.
 
wantmygcnow said:
What is so surprising about this? Lots of Iranian Americans in the U.S. I read somewhere that after Latinos & Indians. Iranians are the next minority..

Lets see how bush handles this.


It is surprising b/c he is a high level government office, not just an ordinary Iranian.

That said, I read somewhere that Hu Jintao's daughter also has a green card.
 
wantmygcnow said:
What is so surprising about this? Lots of Iranian Americans in the U.S. I read somewhere that after Latinos & Indians. Iranians are the next minority..

Lets see how bush handles this.

Tons!! Well-to-do and well educated. Doctors, lawyers, engineers...They shuttle back and forth and maintain close ties with their countries and families. When I worked in the immigration court, there were a couple of Iranian American trial attorneys representing the INS. One of them had to recuse herself from trying a case, because it involved her relatives. Another tricky situation for the Bush administration. What are they going to do now? Take their green cards and citizenships away, because 'times have changed'?
 
kiev said:
It is surprising b/c he is a high level government office, not just an ordinary Iranian.

That said, I read somewhere that Hu Jintao's daughter also has a green card.

What's surprising about it. He got great education here, went back to his country to visit, was introduced to some people who are in the current government, and they offered him a job with the office. Anybody ordinary can become high-level anytime.
 
It happened a few years ago to a senior member of the Ministry of Public Security of China (the national police). It created an uproar in the Chinese community here and the Government revoked the green card.
 
anotheryear said:
It happened a few years ago to a senior member of the Ministry of Public Security of China (the national police). It created an uproar in the Chinese community here and the Government revoked the green card.


The Government HAS to revoke the green card in situations this like. It happened to the deputy minister of my country and his family too.
 
JoeF said:
Actually, this is quite easy. An LPR has to reside in the US. Somebody in a government position abroad obviously doesn't reside in the US. Hence, a simple administrative act is all that is needed to determine that the person has abandoned the GC.
The article quoted is of course, as often with journalistic freedom, not overly accurate. A GC can be considered abandoned with less than a day abroad.
Even US citizenship can be revoked if the person has a high-level, policy-making position in a foreign government. See http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_778.html


Good posts, Joe. A random check of posts in this board shows that people do not really understand that a green card can be lost for a number of reasons. The term permanent is highly misleading in many senses.
 
formerasylee said:
Good posts, Joe. A random check of posts in this board shows that people do not really understand that a green card can be lost for a number of reasons. The term permanent is highly misleading in many senses.


Formerasylee:

First at all thanks for sharing with us. Do you think that GC could be revoke to a former asylee that visited country of persecution (COP)? Thanks.
 
Cl_Asylee said:
Formerasylee:

First at all thanks for sharing with us. Do you think that GC could be revoke to a former asylee that visited country of persecution (COP)? Thanks.


It depends on the specifics of the asylum application, country conditions and the reason(s) for your trip. There is no per se rule one way or the other.

People would be seriously mistaken if you thought that the USCIS did not care about this anymore the minute they issued them the green card.
 
formerasylee said:
It depends on the specifics of the asylum application, country conditions and the reason(s) for your trip. There is no per se rule one way or the other.

People would be seriously mistaken if you thought that the USCIS did not care about this anymore the minute they issued them the green card.

Thanks for your opinion.
 
Top