Guys,
I received my green card today.
PD: May 2004, EB3 India
I-485 RD Dec 2004
485 Filed for wife: RD : July 2, 2007 ND: Aug 9, 2007
(we were married in 2006 and wife came to US in 2006 on H4 visa)
The green card says: Resident since July 2, 2007
I know i have asked this before but was assuming that residency date would be Aug 2007 when i received emails/welcome notice.
Can USCIS deny wife's 485 because i got permanent residency before her application was received or because they were on the same day?
Ginnu, TheRealCanadian have previously commented that i should not be worried because her case has been accepted.
However, her case was accepted in the floodgate period, though ND is Aug 9, 2007....way later than them granting me residency. Although RD is still Jul 2.
Sorry for asking again, but is her case in trouble IF USCIS realizes later on that her 485 filing was AFTER my residencey was granted? (and that they accepted her filing because they were overloaded)
If so what are remedies? Is 245(i) applicable here,? or anything else?
I received my green card today.
PD: May 2004, EB3 India
I-485 RD Dec 2004
485 Filed for wife: RD : July 2, 2007 ND: Aug 9, 2007
(we were married in 2006 and wife came to US in 2006 on H4 visa)
The green card says: Resident since July 2, 2007
I know i have asked this before but was assuming that residency date would be Aug 2007 when i received emails/welcome notice.
Can USCIS deny wife's 485 because i got permanent residency before her application was received or because they were on the same day?
Ginnu, TheRealCanadian have previously commented that i should not be worried because her case has been accepted.
However, her case was accepted in the floodgate period, though ND is Aug 9, 2007....way later than them granting me residency. Although RD is still Jul 2.
Sorry for asking again, but is her case in trouble IF USCIS realizes later on that her 485 filing was AFTER my residencey was granted? (and that they accepted her filing because they were overloaded)
If so what are remedies? Is 245(i) applicable here,? or anything else?